Cargando…

Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Vibration perception threshold (VPT) is considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the data are sparse comparing the VPT with commonly used bedside modalities. This study was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of simple be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayaprakash, P., Bhansali, Anil, Bhansali, Shobhit, Dutta, Pinaki, Anantharaman, R., Shanmugasundar, G., Ravikiran, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3135993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21727664
_version_ 1782208155773566976
author Jayaprakash, P.
Bhansali, Anil
Bhansali, Shobhit
Dutta, Pinaki
Anantharaman, R.
Shanmugasundar, G.
Ravikiran, M.
author_facet Jayaprakash, P.
Bhansali, Anil
Bhansali, Shobhit
Dutta, Pinaki
Anantharaman, R.
Shanmugasundar, G.
Ravikiran, M.
author_sort Jayaprakash, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Vibration perception threshold (VPT) is considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the data are sparse comparing the VPT with commonly used bedside modalities. This study was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of simple bed side screening modalities for peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 1044 patients with diabetes mellitus attending the Diabetes clinic from January 2007 to May 2008, were included in this study. All subjects had a detailed clinical assessment including Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score, Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) score, ankle reflex, vibration sensation with a 128 Hz tuning fork, 10g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and vibration perception threshold (VPT). RESULTS: The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy was 34.9 per cent with VPT. Foot care practices were followed by only 214 (20.5%) of the study population. When compared with VPT, ankle reflex was the most sensitive (90.7%) but least specific (37.3%). The tuning fork and monofilament tests respectively had lower sensitivity (62.5 and 62.8%) but better specificity (95.3 and 92.9%) and accuracy (78.9 and 77.9%). Significant correlations were observed between the VPT score and the DNE (r = 0.532, P<0.001) and DNS (r = 0.546, P<0.001) scores and absent tuning fork sensation (r= 0.590; P<0.001), monofilament sensation (r= 0.573; P<0.001) and ankle reflex (r = 0.377, P= 0.01). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The present findings show that simple bed side tests are useful for assessing peripheral diabetic neuropathy, even in those subjects in whom foot care practices are not followed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3135993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31359932011-07-19 Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy Jayaprakash, P. Bhansali, Anil Bhansali, Shobhit Dutta, Pinaki Anantharaman, R. Shanmugasundar, G. Ravikiran, M. Indian J Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Vibration perception threshold (VPT) is considered as a gold standard for diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the data are sparse comparing the VPT with commonly used bedside modalities. This study was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of simple bed side screening modalities for peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A total of 1044 patients with diabetes mellitus attending the Diabetes clinic from January 2007 to May 2008, were included in this study. All subjects had a detailed clinical assessment including Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score, Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) score, ankle reflex, vibration sensation with a 128 Hz tuning fork, 10g Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and vibration perception threshold (VPT). RESULTS: The prevalence of peripheral neuropathy was 34.9 per cent with VPT. Foot care practices were followed by only 214 (20.5%) of the study population. When compared with VPT, ankle reflex was the most sensitive (90.7%) but least specific (37.3%). The tuning fork and monofilament tests respectively had lower sensitivity (62.5 and 62.8%) but better specificity (95.3 and 92.9%) and accuracy (78.9 and 77.9%). Significant correlations were observed between the VPT score and the DNE (r = 0.532, P<0.001) and DNS (r = 0.546, P<0.001) scores and absent tuning fork sensation (r= 0.590; P<0.001), monofilament sensation (r= 0.573; P<0.001) and ankle reflex (r = 0.377, P= 0.01). INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The present findings show that simple bed side tests are useful for assessing peripheral diabetic neuropathy, even in those subjects in whom foot care practices are not followed. Medknow Publications 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3135993/ /pubmed/21727664 Text en Copyright: © The Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jayaprakash, P.
Bhansali, Anil
Bhansali, Shobhit
Dutta, Pinaki
Anantharaman, R.
Shanmugasundar, G.
Ravikiran, M.
Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title_full Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title_fullStr Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title_short Validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
title_sort validation of bedside methods in evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3135993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21727664
work_keys_str_mv AT jayaprakashp validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT bhansalianil validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT bhansalishobhit validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT duttapinaki validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT anantharamanr validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT shanmugasundarg validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy
AT ravikiranm validationofbedsidemethodsinevaluationofdiabeticperipheralneuropathy