Cargando…

Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Homeopathy is a complementary and integrative medicine used in depression, The aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority and tolerability of individualized homeopathic medicines [Quinquagintamillesmial (Q-potencies)] in acute depression, using fluoxetine as active control. Ninety-one o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adler, U. C., Paiva, N. M. P., Cesar, A. T., Adler, M. S., Molina, A., Padula, A. E., Calil, H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19687192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep114
_version_ 1782208225259552768
author Adler, U. C.
Paiva, N. M. P.
Cesar, A. T.
Adler, M. S.
Molina, A.
Padula, A. E.
Calil, H. M.
author_facet Adler, U. C.
Paiva, N. M. P.
Cesar, A. T.
Adler, M. S.
Molina, A.
Padula, A. E.
Calil, H. M.
author_sort Adler, U. C.
collection PubMed
description Homeopathy is a complementary and integrative medicine used in depression, The aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority and tolerability of individualized homeopathic medicines [Quinquagintamillesmial (Q-potencies)] in acute depression, using fluoxetine as active control. Ninety-one outpatients with moderate to severe depression were assigned to receive an individualized homeopathic medicine or fluoxetine 20 mg day(−1) (up to 40 mg day(−1)) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind double-dummy 8-week, single-center trial. Primary efficacy measure was the analysis of the mean change in the Montgomery & Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression scores, using a non-inferiority test with margin of 1.45. Secondary efficacy outcomes were response and remission rates. Tolerability was assessed with the side effect rating scale of the Scandinavian Society of Psychopharmacology. Mean MADRS scores differences were not significant at the 4th (P = .654) and 8th weeks (P = .965) of treatment. Non-inferiority of homeopathy was indicated because the upper limit of the confidence interval (CI) for mean difference in MADRS change was less than the non-inferiority margin: mean differences (homeopathy-fluoxetine) were −3.04 (95% CI −6.95, 0.86) and −2.4 (95% CI −6.05, 0.77) at 4th and 8th week, respectively. There were no significant differences between the percentages of response or remission rates in both groups. Tolerability: there were no significant differences between the side effects rates, although a higher percentage of patients treated with fluoxetine reported troublesome side effects and there was a trend toward greater treatment interruption for adverse effects in the fluoxetine group. This study illustrates the feasibility of randomized controlled double-blind trials of homeopathy in depression and indicates the non-inferiority of individualized homeopathic Q-potencies as compared to fluoxetine in acute treatment of outpatients with moderate to severe depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3136538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31365382011-07-28 Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Adler, U. C. Paiva, N. M. P. Cesar, A. T. Adler, M. S. Molina, A. Padula, A. E. Calil, H. M. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Original Article Homeopathy is a complementary and integrative medicine used in depression, The aim of this study is to investigate the non-inferiority and tolerability of individualized homeopathic medicines [Quinquagintamillesmial (Q-potencies)] in acute depression, using fluoxetine as active control. Ninety-one outpatients with moderate to severe depression were assigned to receive an individualized homeopathic medicine or fluoxetine 20 mg day(−1) (up to 40 mg day(−1)) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind double-dummy 8-week, single-center trial. Primary efficacy measure was the analysis of the mean change in the Montgomery & Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression scores, using a non-inferiority test with margin of 1.45. Secondary efficacy outcomes were response and remission rates. Tolerability was assessed with the side effect rating scale of the Scandinavian Society of Psychopharmacology. Mean MADRS scores differences were not significant at the 4th (P = .654) and 8th weeks (P = .965) of treatment. Non-inferiority of homeopathy was indicated because the upper limit of the confidence interval (CI) for mean difference in MADRS change was less than the non-inferiority margin: mean differences (homeopathy-fluoxetine) were −3.04 (95% CI −6.95, 0.86) and −2.4 (95% CI −6.05, 0.77) at 4th and 8th week, respectively. There were no significant differences between the percentages of response or remission rates in both groups. Tolerability: there were no significant differences between the side effects rates, although a higher percentage of patients treated with fluoxetine reported troublesome side effects and there was a trend toward greater treatment interruption for adverse effects in the fluoxetine group. This study illustrates the feasibility of randomized controlled double-blind trials of homeopathy in depression and indicates the non-inferiority of individualized homeopathic Q-potencies as compared to fluoxetine in acute treatment of outpatients with moderate to severe depression. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3136538/ /pubmed/19687192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep114 Text en Copyright © 2011 U. C. Adler et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Adler, U. C.
Paiva, N. M. P.
Cesar, A. T.
Adler, M. S.
Molina, A.
Padula, A. E.
Calil, H. M.
Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title_full Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title_fullStr Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title_short Homeopathic Individualized Q-Potencies versus Fluoxetine for Moderate to Severe Depression: Double-Blind, Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
title_sort homeopathic individualized q-potencies versus fluoxetine for moderate to severe depression: double-blind, randomized non-inferiority trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19687192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep114
work_keys_str_mv AT adleruc homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT paivanmp homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT cesarat homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT adlerms homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT molinaa homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT padulaae homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT calilhm homeopathicindividualizedqpotenciesversusfluoxetineformoderatetoseveredepressiondoubleblindrandomizednoninferioritytrial