Cargando…
How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence?
The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary estimate of how much CAM is evidence-based. For this purpose, I calculated the percentage of 685 treatment/condition pairings evaluated in the “Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine” which are supported by sound data. The resultin...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19465405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep044 |
_version_ | 1782208245841002496 |
---|---|
author | Ernst, Edzard |
author_facet | Ernst, Edzard |
author_sort | Ernst, Edzard |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary estimate of how much CAM is evidence-based. For this purpose, I calculated the percentage of 685 treatment/condition pairings evaluated in the “Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine” which are supported by sound data. The resulting figure was 7.4%. For a range of reasons, it might be a gross over-estimate. Further investigations into this subject are required to arrive at more representative figures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3136881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31368812011-07-26 How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? Ernst, Edzard Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Commentary The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary estimate of how much CAM is evidence-based. For this purpose, I calculated the percentage of 685 treatment/condition pairings evaluated in the “Desktop Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine” which are supported by sound data. The resulting figure was 7.4%. For a range of reasons, it might be a gross over-estimate. Further investigations into this subject are required to arrive at more representative figures. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3136881/ /pubmed/19465405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep044 Text en Copyright © 2011 Edzard Ernst. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ernst, Edzard How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title | How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title_full | How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title_fullStr | How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title_short | How Much of CAM Is Based on Research Evidence? |
title_sort | how much of cam is based on research evidence? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19465405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/nep044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ernstedzard howmuchofcamisbasedonresearchevidence |