Cargando…
The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869 |
_version_ | 1782208248547377152 |
---|---|
author | Le Saux, Guillaume Magenau, Astrid Böcking, Till Gaus, Katharina Gooding, J. Justin |
author_facet | Le Saux, Guillaume Magenau, Astrid Böcking, Till Gaus, Katharina Gooding, J. Justin |
author_sort | Le Saux, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could be independently controlled. We used these surfaces to investigate the relative importance of the surface chemistry of ligand presentation versus surface topography in endothelial cell adhesion. We compared cell adhesion, spreading and migration on surfaces with nano- to micro-scaled pyramids and average densities of 6×10(2)–6×10(11) RGD/mm(2). We found that fewer cells adhered onto rough than flat surfaces and that the optimal average RGD density for cell adhesion was 6×10(5) RGD/mm(2) on flat surfaces and substrata with nano-scaled roughness. Only on surfaces with micro-scaled pyramids did the topography hinder cell migration and a lower average RGD density was optimal for adhesion. In contrast, cell spreading was greatest on surfaces with 6×10(8) RGD/mm(2) irrespectively of presence of feature and their size. In summary, our data suggest that the size of pyramids predominately control the number of endothelial cells that adhere to the substratum but the average RGD density governs the degree of cell spreading and length of focal adhesion within adherent cells. The data points towards a two-step model of cell adhesion: the initial contact of cells with a substratum may be guided by the topography while the engagement of cell surface receptors is predominately controlled by the surface chemistry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3136933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31369332011-07-21 The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion Le Saux, Guillaume Magenau, Astrid Böcking, Till Gaus, Katharina Gooding, J. Justin PLoS One Research Article The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could be independently controlled. We used these surfaces to investigate the relative importance of the surface chemistry of ligand presentation versus surface topography in endothelial cell adhesion. We compared cell adhesion, spreading and migration on surfaces with nano- to micro-scaled pyramids and average densities of 6×10(2)–6×10(11) RGD/mm(2). We found that fewer cells adhered onto rough than flat surfaces and that the optimal average RGD density for cell adhesion was 6×10(5) RGD/mm(2) on flat surfaces and substrata with nano-scaled roughness. Only on surfaces with micro-scaled pyramids did the topography hinder cell migration and a lower average RGD density was optimal for adhesion. In contrast, cell spreading was greatest on surfaces with 6×10(8) RGD/mm(2) irrespectively of presence of feature and their size. In summary, our data suggest that the size of pyramids predominately control the number of endothelial cells that adhere to the substratum but the average RGD density governs the degree of cell spreading and length of focal adhesion within adherent cells. The data points towards a two-step model of cell adhesion: the initial contact of cells with a substratum may be guided by the topography while the engagement of cell surface receptors is predominately controlled by the surface chemistry. Public Library of Science 2011-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3136933/ /pubmed/21779342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869 Text en Le Saux et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Le Saux, Guillaume Magenau, Astrid Böcking, Till Gaus, Katharina Gooding, J. Justin The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title | The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title_full | The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title_fullStr | The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title_full_unstemmed | The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title_short | The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion |
title_sort | relative importance of topography and rgd ligand density for endothelial cell adhesion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lesauxguillaume therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT magenauastrid therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT bockingtill therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT gauskatharina therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT goodingjjustin therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT lesauxguillaume relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT magenauastrid relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT bockingtill relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT gauskatharina relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion AT goodingjjustin relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion |