Cargando…

The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion

The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le Saux, Guillaume, Magenau, Astrid, Böcking, Till, Gaus, Katharina, Gooding, J. Justin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869
_version_ 1782208248547377152
author Le Saux, Guillaume
Magenau, Astrid
Böcking, Till
Gaus, Katharina
Gooding, J. Justin
author_facet Le Saux, Guillaume
Magenau, Astrid
Böcking, Till
Gaus, Katharina
Gooding, J. Justin
author_sort Le Saux, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could be independently controlled. We used these surfaces to investigate the relative importance of the surface chemistry of ligand presentation versus surface topography in endothelial cell adhesion. We compared cell adhesion, spreading and migration on surfaces with nano- to micro-scaled pyramids and average densities of 6×10(2)–6×10(11) RGD/mm(2). We found that fewer cells adhered onto rough than flat surfaces and that the optimal average RGD density for cell adhesion was 6×10(5) RGD/mm(2) on flat surfaces and substrata with nano-scaled roughness. Only on surfaces with micro-scaled pyramids did the topography hinder cell migration and a lower average RGD density was optimal for adhesion. In contrast, cell spreading was greatest on surfaces with 6×10(8) RGD/mm(2) irrespectively of presence of feature and their size. In summary, our data suggest that the size of pyramids predominately control the number of endothelial cells that adhere to the substratum but the average RGD density governs the degree of cell spreading and length of focal adhesion within adherent cells. The data points towards a two-step model of cell adhesion: the initial contact of cells with a substratum may be guided by the topography while the engagement of cell surface receptors is predominately controlled by the surface chemistry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3136933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31369332011-07-21 The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion Le Saux, Guillaume Magenau, Astrid Böcking, Till Gaus, Katharina Gooding, J. Justin PLoS One Research Article The morphology and function of endothelial cells depends on the physical and chemical characteristics of the extracellular environment. Here, we designed silicon surfaces on which topographical features and surface densities of the integrin binding peptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) could be independently controlled. We used these surfaces to investigate the relative importance of the surface chemistry of ligand presentation versus surface topography in endothelial cell adhesion. We compared cell adhesion, spreading and migration on surfaces with nano- to micro-scaled pyramids and average densities of 6×10(2)–6×10(11) RGD/mm(2). We found that fewer cells adhered onto rough than flat surfaces and that the optimal average RGD density for cell adhesion was 6×10(5) RGD/mm(2) on flat surfaces and substrata with nano-scaled roughness. Only on surfaces with micro-scaled pyramids did the topography hinder cell migration and a lower average RGD density was optimal for adhesion. In contrast, cell spreading was greatest on surfaces with 6×10(8) RGD/mm(2) irrespectively of presence of feature and their size. In summary, our data suggest that the size of pyramids predominately control the number of endothelial cells that adhere to the substratum but the average RGD density governs the degree of cell spreading and length of focal adhesion within adherent cells. The data points towards a two-step model of cell adhesion: the initial contact of cells with a substratum may be guided by the topography while the engagement of cell surface receptors is predominately controlled by the surface chemistry. Public Library of Science 2011-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3136933/ /pubmed/21779342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869 Text en Le Saux et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Le Saux, Guillaume
Magenau, Astrid
Böcking, Till
Gaus, Katharina
Gooding, J. Justin
The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title_full The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title_fullStr The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title_full_unstemmed The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title_short The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion
title_sort relative importance of topography and rgd ligand density for endothelial cell adhesion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21779342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021869
work_keys_str_mv AT lesauxguillaume therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT magenauastrid therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT bockingtill therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT gauskatharina therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT goodingjjustin therelativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT lesauxguillaume relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT magenauastrid relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT bockingtill relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT gauskatharina relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion
AT goodingjjustin relativeimportanceoftopographyandrgdliganddensityforendothelialcelladhesion