Cargando…

Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability

RNA sequencing has generated much excitement for the advantages offered over microarrays. This excitement has led to a barrage of publications discounting the importance of biological variability; as microarray publications did in the 1990s. By comparing microarray and sequencing data, we demonstrat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Kasper D., Wu, Zhijin, Irizarry, Rafael A., Leek, Jeffrey T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1910
_version_ 1782208279681695744
author Hansen, Kasper D.
Wu, Zhijin
Irizarry, Rafael A.
Leek, Jeffrey T.
author_facet Hansen, Kasper D.
Wu, Zhijin
Irizarry, Rafael A.
Leek, Jeffrey T.
author_sort Hansen, Kasper D.
collection PubMed
description RNA sequencing has generated much excitement for the advantages offered over microarrays. This excitement has led to a barrage of publications discounting the importance of biological variability; as microarray publications did in the 1990s. By comparing microarray and sequencing data, we demonstrate that expression measurements exhibit biological variability across individuals irrespective of measurement technology. Our analysis suggests RNA-sequencing experiments designed to estimate biological variability are more likely to produce reproducible results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3137276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31372762012-01-11 Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability Hansen, Kasper D. Wu, Zhijin Irizarry, Rafael A. Leek, Jeffrey T. Nat Biotechnol Article RNA sequencing has generated much excitement for the advantages offered over microarrays. This excitement has led to a barrage of publications discounting the importance of biological variability; as microarray publications did in the 1990s. By comparing microarray and sequencing data, we demonstrate that expression measurements exhibit biological variability across individuals irrespective of measurement technology. Our analysis suggests RNA-sequencing experiments designed to estimate biological variability are more likely to produce reproducible results. 2011-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3137276/ /pubmed/21747377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1910 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Hansen, Kasper D.
Wu, Zhijin
Irizarry, Rafael A.
Leek, Jeffrey T.
Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title_full Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title_fullStr Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title_full_unstemmed Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title_short Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
title_sort sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21747377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1910
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenkasperd sequencingtechnologydoesnoteliminatebiologicalvariability
AT wuzhijin sequencingtechnologydoesnoteliminatebiologicalvariability
AT irizarryrafaela sequencingtechnologydoesnoteliminatebiologicalvariability
AT leekjeffreyt sequencingtechnologydoesnoteliminatebiologicalvariability