Cargando…

Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the friction (F) generated by aligned stainless steel (SS) conventional brackets, self-ligating Damon MX(©) brackets (SDS Ormco, Glendora, California, USA), Time3(©) brackets (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA), Vision LP(©) brackets (American...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tecco, Simona, Di Iorio, Donato, Nucera, Riccardo, Di Bisceglie, Beatrice, Cordasco, Giancarlo, Festa, Felice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769273
_version_ 1782208291188768768
author Tecco, Simona
Di Iorio, Donato
Nucera, Riccardo
Di Bisceglie, Beatrice
Cordasco, Giancarlo
Festa, Felice
author_facet Tecco, Simona
Di Iorio, Donato
Nucera, Riccardo
Di Bisceglie, Beatrice
Cordasco, Giancarlo
Festa, Felice
author_sort Tecco, Simona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the friction (F) generated by aligned stainless steel (SS) conventional brackets, self-ligating Damon MX(©) brackets (SDS Ormco, Glendora, California, USA), Time3(©) brackets (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA), Vision LP(©) brackets (American Orthodontics), and low-friction Slide(©) ligatures (Leone, Firenze, Italy) coupled with various SS, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (TMA) archwires. METHODS: All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot, and the orthodontic archwires were 0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.014×0.025-inch, 0.018×0.025-inch, and 0.019×0.025-inch NiTi; 0.017×0.025-inch TMA; and 0.019×0.025-inch SS. Each bracket-archwire combination was tested 10 times. In the test, 10 brackets of the same group were mounted in alignment on a metal bar. The archwires moved through all the 10 brackets at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min (each run lasted approximately 5 min). The differences among 5 groups of brackets were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a Mann-Whitney test was calculated as post hoc analysis. The P value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Coupled with 0.014-inch NiTi and 0.016-inch NiTi, Victory Series(©) brackets generated the greatest F, while Damon MX(©) and Vision LP(©) brackets generated the lowest (P<.05); no significant differences were observed between Time3(©) brackets and Slide(©) ligatures. Coupled with all the rectangular archwires, Victory Series(©) brackets, Slide(©) ligatures, and Vision LP(©) self-ligating brackets generated significantly lower F than did Time3(©) and Damon MX(©) self-ligating brackets (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that self-ligating brackets are a family of brackets that, in vitro, can generate different levels of F when coupled with thin or thick, rectangular, or round archwires. Clinical conclusions based on our results are not possible due to the limitations of the experimental conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3137445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31374452011-07-18 Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems Tecco, Simona Di Iorio, Donato Nucera, Riccardo Di Bisceglie, Beatrice Cordasco, Giancarlo Festa, Felice Eur J Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study evaluated the friction (F) generated by aligned stainless steel (SS) conventional brackets, self-ligating Damon MX(©) brackets (SDS Ormco, Glendora, California, USA), Time3(©) brackets (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wisconsin, USA), Vision LP(©) brackets (American Orthodontics), and low-friction Slide(©) ligatures (Leone, Firenze, Italy) coupled with various SS, nickel-titanium (NiTi), and beta-titanium (TMA) archwires. METHODS: All brackets had a 0.022-inch slot, and the orthodontic archwires were 0.014-inch, 0.016-inch, 0.014×0.025-inch, 0.018×0.025-inch, and 0.019×0.025-inch NiTi; 0.017×0.025-inch TMA; and 0.019×0.025-inch SS. Each bracket-archwire combination was tested 10 times. In the test, 10 brackets of the same group were mounted in alignment on a metal bar. The archwires moved through all the 10 brackets at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min (each run lasted approximately 5 min). The differences among 5 groups of brackets were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a Mann-Whitney test was calculated as post hoc analysis. The P value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Coupled with 0.014-inch NiTi and 0.016-inch NiTi, Victory Series(©) brackets generated the greatest F, while Damon MX(©) and Vision LP(©) brackets generated the lowest (P<.05); no significant differences were observed between Time3(©) brackets and Slide(©) ligatures. Coupled with all the rectangular archwires, Victory Series(©) brackets, Slide(©) ligatures, and Vision LP(©) self-ligating brackets generated significantly lower F than did Time3(©) and Damon MX(©) self-ligating brackets (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that self-ligating brackets are a family of brackets that, in vitro, can generate different levels of F when coupled with thin or thick, rectangular, or round archwires. Clinical conclusions based on our results are not possible due to the limitations of the experimental conditions. Dental Investigations Society 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3137445/ /pubmed/21769273 Text en Copyright 2011 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tecco, Simona
Di Iorio, Donato
Nucera, Riccardo
Di Bisceglie, Beatrice
Cordasco, Giancarlo
Festa, Felice
Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title_full Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title_short Evaluation of the Friction of Self-Ligating and Conventional Bracket Systems
title_sort evaluation of the friction of self-ligating and conventional bracket systems
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769273
work_keys_str_mv AT teccosimona evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems
AT diioriodonato evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems
AT nucerariccardo evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems
AT dibiscegliebeatrice evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems
AT cordascogiancarlo evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems
AT festafelice evaluationofthefrictionofselfligatingandconventionalbracketsystems