Cargando…

Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic quality of root canal fillings performed by first and second clinical year dental students at the Faculty of Dentistry in Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey. METHODS: The technical quality of 833 root canal fillings was evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unal, Gul Celik, Kececi, Ayse Diljin, Kaya, Bulem Ureyen, Tac, Ali Gurhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Investigations Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769275
_version_ 1782208291681599488
author Unal, Gul Celik
Kececi, Ayse Diljin
Kaya, Bulem Ureyen
Tac, Ali Gurhan
author_facet Unal, Gul Celik
Kececi, Ayse Diljin
Kaya, Bulem Ureyen
Tac, Ali Gurhan
author_sort Unal, Gul Celik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic quality of root canal fillings performed by first and second clinical year dental students at the Faculty of Dentistry in Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey. METHODS: The technical quality of 833 root canal fillings was evaluated by three examiners according to the density of the filling and the distance between the end of the filling and the radiographic apex. A root canal with acceptable filling length and homogeneous root filling was defined as being good quality endodontic work (GQEW). A treated tooth was defined as having good quality endodontic work tooth (GQEW-T) when all its canals had a GQEW rating. RESULTS: A Chi-square (χ(2)) test at the 0.05 significance level was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Of a total of 833 root canals, 662 (79.47%) root fillings were classed as GQEW. Two hundred fifty canals (73.4%) (135 teeth) treated by first clinical year dental students were defined as GQEW-T while 412 canals (204 teeth) (73.9%) treated by second clinical year dental students were defined as GQEW-T (P>.05). Most of the GQEW-T were defined in anterior teeth (90.1%), whereas the fewest were in molar teeth (46.6%) for both first and second clinical year dental students (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of root canal fillings in anterior teeth performed by undergraduate dental students in Isparta, Turkey was satisfactory. However, to improve the success with molar teeth, education about newer techniques and instruments must be incorporated into the preclinical and clinical curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3137447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dental Investigations Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31374472011-07-18 Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students Unal, Gul Celik Kececi, Ayse Diljin Kaya, Bulem Ureyen Tac, Ali Gurhan Eur J Dent Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic quality of root canal fillings performed by first and second clinical year dental students at the Faculty of Dentistry in Süleyman Demirel University, Turkey. METHODS: The technical quality of 833 root canal fillings was evaluated by three examiners according to the density of the filling and the distance between the end of the filling and the radiographic apex. A root canal with acceptable filling length and homogeneous root filling was defined as being good quality endodontic work (GQEW). A treated tooth was defined as having good quality endodontic work tooth (GQEW-T) when all its canals had a GQEW rating. RESULTS: A Chi-square (χ(2)) test at the 0.05 significance level was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Of a total of 833 root canals, 662 (79.47%) root fillings were classed as GQEW. Two hundred fifty canals (73.4%) (135 teeth) treated by first clinical year dental students were defined as GQEW-T while 412 canals (204 teeth) (73.9%) treated by second clinical year dental students were defined as GQEW-T (P>.05). Most of the GQEW-T were defined in anterior teeth (90.1%), whereas the fewest were in molar teeth (46.6%) for both first and second clinical year dental students (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of root canal fillings in anterior teeth performed by undergraduate dental students in Isparta, Turkey was satisfactory. However, to improve the success with molar teeth, education about newer techniques and instruments must be incorporated into the preclinical and clinical curriculum. Dental Investigations Society 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3137447/ /pubmed/21769275 Text en Copyright 2011 European Journal of Dentistry. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Unal, Gul Celik
Kececi, Ayse Diljin
Kaya, Bulem Ureyen
Tac, Ali Gurhan
Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title_full Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title_fullStr Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title_short Quality of Root Canal Fillings Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students
title_sort quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate dental students
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21769275
work_keys_str_mv AT unalgulcelik qualityofrootcanalfillingsperformedbyundergraduatedentalstudents
AT kececiaysediljin qualityofrootcanalfillingsperformedbyundergraduatedentalstudents
AT kayabulemureyen qualityofrootcanalfillingsperformedbyundergraduatedentalstudents
AT tacaligurhan qualityofrootcanalfillingsperformedbyundergraduatedentalstudents