Cargando…
Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237 |
_version_ | 1782208345867812864 |
---|---|
author | Mori, Hirohito Kobara, Hideki Muramatsu, Akemi Inoue, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Takako Hagiike, Masanobu Izuishi, Kunihiko Suzuki, Yasuyuki Gong, Jian Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_facet | Mori, Hirohito Kobara, Hideki Muramatsu, Akemi Inoue, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Takako Hagiike, Masanobu Izuishi, Kunihiko Suzuki, Yasuyuki Gong, Jian Masaki, Tsutomu |
author_sort | Mori, Hirohito |
collection | PubMed |
description | Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To reduce postoperative complications, we have applied ESD with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia. This study included 50 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer, 25 with air insufflation and intravenous anesthesia (Air/IV group), and the remaining 25 with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia (CO(2)/GA group). Postoperative enlarged feeling of the abdomen was observed only in 1 of 25 patients in the CO(2)/GA group (P = 0.0416). Postoperative severe unrest was observed in none of the patients in the CO(2)/GA group and in 4 of 25 (16%) patients in the Air/IV group (P = 0.0371). CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia are useful in stabilizing intraoperative conditions and reducing postoperative complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3137981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31379812011-07-22 Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias Mori, Hirohito Kobara, Hideki Muramatsu, Akemi Inoue, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Takako Hagiike, Masanobu Izuishi, Kunihiko Suzuki, Yasuyuki Gong, Jian Masaki, Tsutomu Diagn Ther Endosc Clinical Study Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To reduce postoperative complications, we have applied ESD with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia. This study included 50 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer, 25 with air insufflation and intravenous anesthesia (Air/IV group), and the remaining 25 with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia (CO(2)/GA group). Postoperative enlarged feeling of the abdomen was observed only in 1 of 25 patients in the CO(2)/GA group (P = 0.0416). Postoperative severe unrest was observed in none of the patients in the CO(2)/GA group and in 4 of 25 (16%) patients in the Air/IV group (P = 0.0371). CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia are useful in stabilizing intraoperative conditions and reducing postoperative complications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3137981/ /pubmed/21785562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hirohito Mori et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Mori, Hirohito Kobara, Hideki Muramatsu, Akemi Inoue, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Takako Hagiike, Masanobu Izuishi, Kunihiko Suzuki, Yasuyuki Gong, Jian Masaki, Tsutomu Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title | Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title_full | Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title_short | Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias |
title_sort | comparison of postoperative complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection: differences of insufflations and anesthesias |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morihirohito comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT kobarahideki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT muramatsuakemi comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT inouehideyuki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT kobayashimitsuyoshi comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT nomuratakako comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT hagiikemasanobu comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT izuishikunihiko comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT suzukiyasuyuki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT gongjian comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias AT masakitsutomu comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias |