Cargando…

Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Hirohito, Kobara, Hideki, Muramatsu, Akemi, Inoue, Hideyuki, Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi, Nomura, Takako, Hagiike, Masanobu, Izuishi, Kunihiko, Suzuki, Yasuyuki, Gong, Jian, Masaki, Tsutomu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237
_version_ 1782208345867812864
author Mori, Hirohito
Kobara, Hideki
Muramatsu, Akemi
Inoue, Hideyuki
Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi
Nomura, Takako
Hagiike, Masanobu
Izuishi, Kunihiko
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Gong, Jian
Masaki, Tsutomu
author_facet Mori, Hirohito
Kobara, Hideki
Muramatsu, Akemi
Inoue, Hideyuki
Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi
Nomura, Takako
Hagiike, Masanobu
Izuishi, Kunihiko
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Gong, Jian
Masaki, Tsutomu
author_sort Mori, Hirohito
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To reduce postoperative complications, we have applied ESD with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia. This study included 50 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer, 25 with air insufflation and intravenous anesthesia (Air/IV group), and the remaining 25 with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia (CO(2)/GA group). Postoperative enlarged feeling of the abdomen was observed only in 1 of 25 patients in the CO(2)/GA group (P = 0.0416). Postoperative severe unrest was observed in none of the patients in the CO(2)/GA group and in 4 of 25 (16%) patients in the Air/IV group (P = 0.0371). CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia are useful in stabilizing intraoperative conditions and reducing postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3137981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31379812011-07-22 Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias Mori, Hirohito Kobara, Hideki Muramatsu, Akemi Inoue, Hideyuki Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Takako Hagiike, Masanobu Izuishi, Kunihiko Suzuki, Yasuyuki Gong, Jian Masaki, Tsutomu Diagn Ther Endosc Clinical Study Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has enabled the collective resection and increased the accuracy of pathological diagnosis. However, ESD requires a long operation time, which results in increased doses of analgesics/sedatives, and causes worsening of respiratory and hemodynamic statuses. To reduce postoperative complications, we have applied ESD with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia. This study included 50 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer, 25 with air insufflation and intravenous anesthesia (Air/IV group), and the remaining 25 with CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia (CO(2)/GA group). Postoperative enlarged feeling of the abdomen was observed only in 1 of 25 patients in the CO(2)/GA group (P = 0.0416). Postoperative severe unrest was observed in none of the patients in the CO(2)/GA group and in 4 of 25 (16%) patients in the Air/IV group (P = 0.0371). CO(2) insufflation and general anesthesia are useful in stabilizing intraoperative conditions and reducing postoperative complications. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3137981/ /pubmed/21785562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237 Text en Copyright © 2011 Hirohito Mori et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mori, Hirohito
Kobara, Hideki
Muramatsu, Akemi
Inoue, Hideyuki
Kobayashi, Mitsuyoshi
Nomura, Takako
Hagiike, Masanobu
Izuishi, Kunihiko
Suzuki, Yasuyuki
Gong, Jian
Masaki, Tsutomu
Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title_full Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title_fullStr Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title_short Comparison of Postoperative Complications after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Differences of Insufflations and Anesthesias
title_sort comparison of postoperative complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection: differences of insufflations and anesthesias
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3137981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/709237
work_keys_str_mv AT morihirohito comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT kobarahideki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT muramatsuakemi comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT inouehideyuki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT kobayashimitsuyoshi comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT nomuratakako comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT hagiikemasanobu comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT izuishikunihiko comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT suzukiyasuyuki comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT gongjian comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias
AT masakitsutomu comparisonofpostoperativecomplicationsafterendoscopicsubmucosaldissectiondifferencesofinsufflationsandanesthesias