Cargando…

Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION: Measurement of respiratory quotient (RQ) and resting energy expenditure (REE) has been shown to be helpful in designing nutritional regimens. There is a paucity of the literature describing the impact of a feeding regimen on the energy expenditure patterns. Therefore, we studied the ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maurya, Indubala, Pawar, Mridula, Garg, Rakesh, Kaur, Mohandeep, Sood, Rajesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82800
_version_ 1782208452282548224
author Maurya, Indubala
Pawar, Mridula
Garg, Rakesh
Kaur, Mohandeep
Sood, Rajesh
author_facet Maurya, Indubala
Pawar, Mridula
Garg, Rakesh
Kaur, Mohandeep
Sood, Rajesh
author_sort Maurya, Indubala
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Measurement of respiratory quotient (RQ) and resting energy expenditure (REE) has been shown to be helpful in designing nutritional regimens. There is a paucity of the literature describing the impact of a feeding regimen on the energy expenditure patterns. Therefore, we studied the effect of continuous vs. intermittent feeding regimen in head-injured patients on mechanical ventilation on RQ and REE. METHODS: After institutional ethical approval, this randomized study was conducted in 40 adult male patients with head injury requiring controlled mode of ventilation. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group C: Feeds (30 kcal/kg/day) were given for 18 h/day, with night rest for 6 h. Group I: Six bolus feeds (30 kcal/kg/day) were given three hourly for 18 h with night rest for 6 h. RQ and REE were recorded every 30 min for 24 h. Blood sugar was measured 4 hourly. Other adverse effects such as feed intolerance, aspiration were noted. RESULTS: Demographic profile and SOFA score were comparable in the two groups. Base line RQ (0.8 vs. 0.86) and REE (1527 vs. 1599 kcal/day) were comparable in both the groups (P>0.05). RQ was comparable in both groups during the study period at any time of the day (P>0.05). Base line RQ was compared with all other RQ values measured every half hour and fluctuation from the base line value was insignificant in both groups (P>0.05). REE was comparable in both the groups throughout the study period (P>0.5). Adequacy of feeding as assessed by EI/MREE was 105.7% and 105.3% in group C and group I, respectively. There was no significant difference in the blood sugar levels between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: We found from our study that RQ, REE, and blood sugar remain comparable with two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in neurosurgical patients on ventilator support in a ICU setup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3139315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31393152011-07-29 Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients Maurya, Indubala Pawar, Mridula Garg, Rakesh Kaur, Mohandeep Sood, Rajesh Saudi J Anaesth Original Article INTRODUCTION: Measurement of respiratory quotient (RQ) and resting energy expenditure (REE) has been shown to be helpful in designing nutritional regimens. There is a paucity of the literature describing the impact of a feeding regimen on the energy expenditure patterns. Therefore, we studied the effect of continuous vs. intermittent feeding regimen in head-injured patients on mechanical ventilation on RQ and REE. METHODS: After institutional ethical approval, this randomized study was conducted in 40 adult male patients with head injury requiring controlled mode of ventilation. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group C: Feeds (30 kcal/kg/day) were given for 18 h/day, with night rest for 6 h. Group I: Six bolus feeds (30 kcal/kg/day) were given three hourly for 18 h with night rest for 6 h. RQ and REE were recorded every 30 min for 24 h. Blood sugar was measured 4 hourly. Other adverse effects such as feed intolerance, aspiration were noted. RESULTS: Demographic profile and SOFA score were comparable in the two groups. Base line RQ (0.8 vs. 0.86) and REE (1527 vs. 1599 kcal/day) were comparable in both the groups (P>0.05). RQ was comparable in both groups during the study period at any time of the day (P>0.05). Base line RQ was compared with all other RQ values measured every half hour and fluctuation from the base line value was insignificant in both groups (P>0.05). REE was comparable in both the groups throughout the study period (P>0.5). Adequacy of feeding as assessed by EI/MREE was 105.7% and 105.3% in group C and group I, respectively. There was no significant difference in the blood sugar levels between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: We found from our study that RQ, REE, and blood sugar remain comparable with two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in neurosurgical patients on ventilator support in a ICU setup. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3139315/ /pubmed/21804803 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82800 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maurya, Indubala
Pawar, Mridula
Garg, Rakesh
Kaur, Mohandeep
Sood, Rajesh
Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title_full Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title_fullStr Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title_short Comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
title_sort comparison of respiratory quotient and resting energy expenditure in two regimens of enteral feeding – continuous vs. intermittent in head-injured critically ill patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804803
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82800
work_keys_str_mv AT mauryaindubala comparisonofrespiratoryquotientandrestingenergyexpenditureintworegimensofenteralfeedingcontinuousvsintermittentinheadinjuredcriticallyillpatients
AT pawarmridula comparisonofrespiratoryquotientandrestingenergyexpenditureintworegimensofenteralfeedingcontinuousvsintermittentinheadinjuredcriticallyillpatients
AT gargrakesh comparisonofrespiratoryquotientandrestingenergyexpenditureintworegimensofenteralfeedingcontinuousvsintermittentinheadinjuredcriticallyillpatients
AT kaurmohandeep comparisonofrespiratoryquotientandrestingenergyexpenditureintworegimensofenteralfeedingcontinuousvsintermittentinheadinjuredcriticallyillpatients
AT soodrajesh comparisonofrespiratoryquotientandrestingenergyexpenditureintworegimensofenteralfeedingcontinuousvsintermittentinheadinjuredcriticallyillpatients