Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to compare the onset, degree and recovery time of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with sufentanil or butorphanol in endoscopic urological surgeries. METHODS: In a randomized, double-bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Manpreet, Katyal, Sunil, Kathuria, Suneet, Singh, Prabhjot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82804
_version_ 1782208452510089216
author Kaur, Manpreet
Katyal, Sunil
Kathuria, Suneet
Singh, Prabhjot
author_facet Kaur, Manpreet
Katyal, Sunil
Kathuria, Suneet
Singh, Prabhjot
author_sort Kaur, Manpreet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to compare the onset, degree and recovery time of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with sufentanil or butorphanol in endoscopic urological surgeries. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 90 patients of either sex and age, belonging to ASA Grades I and II, scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgeries under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into three groups of 30 each. Patients received either 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric buypivacaine 12.5 mg (Group A), 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 10 μg sufentanil (Group B) or 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 25 μg butorphanol (Group C). Vital parameters, level, duration and regression of sensory block and motor block and side-effects were recorded and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc test and Chi-square test were used. RESULTS: Intrathecal addition of sufentanil/butorphanol prolonged the duration of sensory block (DOSB) compared with bupivacaine alone (DOSB being 156.83±23.83 min, 170.87 ± 22.21 min and 171.17 ± 23.99 min in groups A, B and C, respectively) without altering the duration of motor blockade. Bromage score 3 was achieved in 100%, 90% and 54.4% patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. The time to first request for analgesia was 112 ± 46.3 min, 323 ± 65.0 min and 299 ± 73.9 min in groups A, B and C, respectively. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus (60%). CONCLUSIONS: The analgesia was significantly prolonged in groups B and C; group C had a less-intense motor block. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus. Thus, this combination of butorphanol with low-dose bupivacaine is especially beneficial in the geriatric group of patients who have multiple co-morbid conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3139316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31393162011-07-29 A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery Kaur, Manpreet Katyal, Sunil Kathuria, Suneet Singh, Prabhjot Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to compare the onset, degree and recovery time of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with sufentanil or butorphanol in endoscopic urological surgeries. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 90 patients of either sex and age, belonging to ASA Grades I and II, scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgeries under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into three groups of 30 each. Patients received either 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric buypivacaine 12.5 mg (Group A), 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 10 μg sufentanil (Group B) or 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 25 μg butorphanol (Group C). Vital parameters, level, duration and regression of sensory block and motor block and side-effects were recorded and compared. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc test and Chi-square test were used. RESULTS: Intrathecal addition of sufentanil/butorphanol prolonged the duration of sensory block (DOSB) compared with bupivacaine alone (DOSB being 156.83±23.83 min, 170.87 ± 22.21 min and 171.17 ± 23.99 min in groups A, B and C, respectively) without altering the duration of motor blockade. Bromage score 3 was achieved in 100%, 90% and 54.4% patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. The time to first request for analgesia was 112 ± 46.3 min, 323 ± 65.0 min and 299 ± 73.9 min in groups A, B and C, respectively. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus (60%). CONCLUSIONS: The analgesia was significantly prolonged in groups B and C; group C had a less-intense motor block. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus. Thus, this combination of butorphanol with low-dose bupivacaine is especially beneficial in the geriatric group of patients who have multiple co-morbid conditions. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3139316/ /pubmed/21804804 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82804 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Manpreet
Katyal, Sunil
Kathuria, Suneet
Singh, Prabhjot
A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title_full A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title_short A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
title_sort comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804804
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.82804
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurmanpreet acomparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT katyalsunil acomparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT kathuriasuneet acomparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT singhprabhjot acomparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT kaurmanpreet comparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT katyalsunil comparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT kathuriasuneet comparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery
AT singhprabhjot comparativeevaluationofintrathecalbupivacainealonesufentanilorbutorphanolincombinationwithbupivacaineforendoscopicurologicalsurgery