Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study

Objectives To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies. Design Retrospective population based registry study. Setting East Midlands and South Yorkshire regions of England (representing about 10% of births in England an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Lucy K, Budd, Judith L S, Field, David J, Draper, Elizabeth S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21771825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4306
_version_ 1782208461003554816
author Smith, Lucy K
Budd, Judith L S
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
author_facet Smith, Lucy K
Budd, Judith L S
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
author_sort Smith, Lucy K
collection PubMed
description Objectives To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies. Design Retrospective population based registry study. Setting East Midlands and South Yorkshire regions of England (representing about 10% of births in England and Wales). Participants All registered cases of nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome audited as part of the United Kingdom’s fetal anomaly screening programme with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. Main outcome measures Socioeconomic variation in the risk of selected congenital anomalies; outcome of pregnancy; incidence of live birth and neonatal mortality over time. Deprivation measured with the index of multiple deprivation 2004 at super output area level. Results There were 1579 fetuses registered with one of the nine selected congenital anomalies. There was no evidence of variation in the overall risk of these anomalies with deprivation (rate ratio for the most deprived 10th with the least deprived 10th: 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.23). The rate ratio varied with type of anomaly and maternal age (deprivation rate ratio adjusted for maternal age: 1.43 (1.17 to 1.74) for non-chromosomal anomalies; 0.85 (0.63 to 1.15) for chromosomal anomalies). Of the nine anomalies, 86% were detected in the antenatal period, and there was no evidence that this varied with deprivation (rate ratio 0.99, 0.84 to 1.17). The rate of termination after antenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly was lower in the most deprived areas compared with the least deprived areas (63% v 79%; rate ratio 0.80, 0.65 to 0.97). Consequently there were significant socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of live birth and neonatal mortality associated with the presence of any of these nine anomalies. Compared with the least deprived areas, the most deprived areas had a 61% higher rate of live births (1.61, 1.21 to 2.15) and a 98% higher neonatal mortality rate (1.98, 1.20 to 3.27) associated with a congenital anomaly. Conclusions Antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has reduced neonatal mortality through termination of pregnancy. Socioeconomic variation in decisions regarding termination of pregnancy after antenatal detection, however, has resulted in wide socioeconomic inequalities in liveborn infants with a congenital anomaly and subsequent neonatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3139368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31393682011-08-15 Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study Smith, Lucy K Budd, Judith L S Field, David J Draper, Elizabeth S BMJ Research Objectives To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies. Design Retrospective population based registry study. Setting East Midlands and South Yorkshire regions of England (representing about 10% of births in England and Wales). Participants All registered cases of nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome audited as part of the United Kingdom’s fetal anomaly screening programme with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. Main outcome measures Socioeconomic variation in the risk of selected congenital anomalies; outcome of pregnancy; incidence of live birth and neonatal mortality over time. Deprivation measured with the index of multiple deprivation 2004 at super output area level. Results There were 1579 fetuses registered with one of the nine selected congenital anomalies. There was no evidence of variation in the overall risk of these anomalies with deprivation (rate ratio for the most deprived 10th with the least deprived 10th: 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.23). The rate ratio varied with type of anomaly and maternal age (deprivation rate ratio adjusted for maternal age: 1.43 (1.17 to 1.74) for non-chromosomal anomalies; 0.85 (0.63 to 1.15) for chromosomal anomalies). Of the nine anomalies, 86% were detected in the antenatal period, and there was no evidence that this varied with deprivation (rate ratio 0.99, 0.84 to 1.17). The rate of termination after antenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly was lower in the most deprived areas compared with the least deprived areas (63% v 79%; rate ratio 0.80, 0.65 to 0.97). Consequently there were significant socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of live birth and neonatal mortality associated with the presence of any of these nine anomalies. Compared with the least deprived areas, the most deprived areas had a 61% higher rate of live births (1.61, 1.21 to 2.15) and a 98% higher neonatal mortality rate (1.98, 1.20 to 3.27) associated with a congenital anomaly. Conclusions Antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has reduced neonatal mortality through termination of pregnancy. Socioeconomic variation in decisions regarding termination of pregnancy after antenatal detection, however, has resulted in wide socioeconomic inequalities in liveborn infants with a congenital anomaly and subsequent neonatal mortality. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2011-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3139368/ /pubmed/21771825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4306 Text en © Smith et al 2011 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Lucy K
Budd, Judith L S
Field, David J
Draper, Elizabeth S
Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139368/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21771825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4306
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlucyk socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomeofpregnancyandneonatalmortalityassociatedwithcongenitalanomaliespopulationbasedstudy
AT buddjudithls socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomeofpregnancyandneonatalmortalityassociatedwithcongenitalanomaliespopulationbasedstudy
AT fielddavidj socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomeofpregnancyandneonatalmortalityassociatedwithcongenitalanomaliespopulationbasedstudy
AT draperelizabeths socioeconomicinequalitiesinoutcomeofpregnancyandneonatalmortalityassociatedwithcongenitalanomaliespopulationbasedstudy