Cargando…

Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The unparalleled success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is based on the combination of three drugs from two classes. There is insufficient evidence whether simplification to ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathis, Sandra, Khanlari, Bettina, Pulido, Federico, Schechter, Mauro, Negredo, Eugenia, Nelson, Mark, Vernazza, Pietro, Cahn, Pedro, Meynard, Jean-Luc, Arribas, Jose, Bucher, Heiner C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022003
_version_ 1782208479111413760
author Mathis, Sandra
Khanlari, Bettina
Pulido, Federico
Schechter, Mauro
Negredo, Eugenia
Nelson, Mark
Vernazza, Pietro
Cahn, Pedro
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Arribas, Jose
Bucher, Heiner C.
author_facet Mathis, Sandra
Khanlari, Bettina
Pulido, Federico
Schechter, Mauro
Negredo, Eugenia
Nelson, Mark
Vernazza, Pietro
Cahn, Pedro
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Arribas, Jose
Bucher, Heiner C.
author_sort Mathis, Sandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The unparalleled success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is based on the combination of three drugs from two classes. There is insufficient evidence whether simplification to ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients is effective and safe to reduce cART side effects and costs. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and trial registries to identify all randomised controlled trials comparing PI/r monotherapy to cART in suppressed patients. We calculated in an intention to treat (loss-of follow-up, discontinuation of assigned drugs equals failure) and per-protocol analysis (exclusion of protocol violators following randomisation) and based on three different definitions for virological failure pooled risk ratios for remaining virologically suppressed. FINDINGS: We identified 10 trials comparing 3 different PIs with cART based on a PI/r plus 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 1189 patients. With the most conservative approach (viral load <50 copies/ml on two consecutive measurements), the risk ratios for viral suppression at 48 weeks of PI/r monotherapy compared to cART were in the ITT analysis 0.94 8 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.00) p = 0.06; risk difference −0.06 (95%CI -0.11 to 0) p = 0.05, p for heterogeneity  = 0.08, I(2) = 43.1%) and in the PP analysis 0.93 ((95%CI 0.90 to 0.97) p<0.001; risk difference −0.07 (95%CI −0.10 to −0.03) p<0.001, p for heterogeneity  = 0.44, I(2) = 0%). Reintroduction of cART in 44 patients with virological failure led in 93% to de-novo viral suppression. INTERPRETATION: Virologically well suppressed HIV-infected patients have a lower chance to maintain viral suppression when switching from cART to PI/r monotherapy. Failing patients achieve high rates of de-novo viral suppression following reintroduction of reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3139616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31396162011-08-02 Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis Mathis, Sandra Khanlari, Bettina Pulido, Federico Schechter, Mauro Negredo, Eugenia Nelson, Mark Vernazza, Pietro Cahn, Pedro Meynard, Jean-Luc Arribas, Jose Bucher, Heiner C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The unparalleled success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) is based on the combination of three drugs from two classes. There is insufficient evidence whether simplification to ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) monotherapy in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients is effective and safe to reduce cART side effects and costs. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and trial registries to identify all randomised controlled trials comparing PI/r monotherapy to cART in suppressed patients. We calculated in an intention to treat (loss-of follow-up, discontinuation of assigned drugs equals failure) and per-protocol analysis (exclusion of protocol violators following randomisation) and based on three different definitions for virological failure pooled risk ratios for remaining virologically suppressed. FINDINGS: We identified 10 trials comparing 3 different PIs with cART based on a PI/r plus 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 1189 patients. With the most conservative approach (viral load <50 copies/ml on two consecutive measurements), the risk ratios for viral suppression at 48 weeks of PI/r monotherapy compared to cART were in the ITT analysis 0.94 8 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.00) p = 0.06; risk difference −0.06 (95%CI -0.11 to 0) p = 0.05, p for heterogeneity  = 0.08, I(2) = 43.1%) and in the PP analysis 0.93 ((95%CI 0.90 to 0.97) p<0.001; risk difference −0.07 (95%CI −0.10 to −0.03) p<0.001, p for heterogeneity  = 0.44, I(2) = 0%). Reintroduction of cART in 44 patients with virological failure led in 93% to de-novo viral suppression. INTERPRETATION: Virologically well suppressed HIV-infected patients have a lower chance to maintain viral suppression when switching from cART to PI/r monotherapy. Failing patients achieve high rates of de-novo viral suppression following reintroduction of reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Public Library of Science 2011-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3139616/ /pubmed/21811554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022003 Text en Mathis et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mathis, Sandra
Khanlari, Bettina
Pulido, Federico
Schechter, Mauro
Negredo, Eugenia
Nelson, Mark
Vernazza, Pietro
Cahn, Pedro
Meynard, Jean-Luc
Arribas, Jose
Bucher, Heiner C.
Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Combination Antiretroviral Maintenance Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness of protease inhibitor monotherapy versus combination antiretroviral maintenance therapy: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022003
work_keys_str_mv AT mathissandra effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT khanlaribettina effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT pulidofederico effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT schechtermauro effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT negredoeugenia effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT nelsonmark effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT vernazzapietro effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT cahnpedro effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT meynardjeanluc effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT arribasjose effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis
AT bucherheinerc effectivenessofproteaseinhibitormonotherapyversuscombinationantiretroviralmaintenancetherapyametaanalysis