Cargando…

The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures

This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for both fracture classification according to Schatzker and treatment plan of tibial plateau fractures using plain radiographs alone and with computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was carried out prospectively to assess the impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: te Stroet, Martijn A. J., Holla, Micha, Biert, Jan, van Kampen, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21394519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0932-5
_version_ 1782208498135728128
author te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
Holla, Micha
Biert, Jan
van Kampen, Albert
author_facet te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
Holla, Micha
Biert, Jan
van Kampen, Albert
author_sort te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for both fracture classification according to Schatzker and treatment plan of tibial plateau fractures using plain radiographs alone and with computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was carried out prospectively to assess the impact of an advanced radiographic study on the agreement of treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. Eight experienced observers (six surgeons and two radiologists) classified 15 tibial plateau fractures with plain radiographs and CT scans and set up a treatment plan. Agreement was measured using kappa coefficients. Using plain radiographs alone, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient for classification was 0.47, which decreased to 0.46 after addition of CT scans. Using plain films alone for formulating a treatment plan, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient was 0.40, which decreased to 0.30 after addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for fracture classification using plain radiographs was 0.60, which decreased to 0.57 with addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for treatment plan based on plain radiographs alone was 0.53, which decreased to 0.45 after addition of CT scans. In contrast with other recent publications, there is no increase in inter- and intra-agreement of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Routine CT scanning of the knee for tibial plateau fractures is not supported by this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3139878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31398782011-09-01 The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures te Stroet, Martijn A. J. Holla, Micha Biert, Jan van Kampen, Albert Emerg Radiol Original Article This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interobserver agreement for both fracture classification according to Schatzker and treatment plan of tibial plateau fractures using plain radiographs alone and with computed tomography (CT) scans. The study was carried out prospectively to assess the impact of an advanced radiographic study on the agreement of treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. Eight experienced observers (six surgeons and two radiologists) classified 15 tibial plateau fractures with plain radiographs and CT scans and set up a treatment plan. Agreement was measured using kappa coefficients. Using plain radiographs alone, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient for classification was 0.47, which decreased to 0.46 after addition of CT scans. Using plain films alone for formulating a treatment plan, the mean interobserver kappa coefficient was 0.40, which decreased to 0.30 after addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for fracture classification using plain radiographs was 0.60, which decreased to 0.57 with addition of CT scans. The mean intraobserver kappa coefficient for treatment plan based on plain radiographs alone was 0.53, which decreased to 0.45 after addition of CT scans. In contrast with other recent publications, there is no increase in inter- and intra-agreement of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Routine CT scanning of the knee for tibial plateau fractures is not supported by this study. Springer-Verlag 2011-03-11 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3139878/ /pubmed/21394519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0932-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
te Stroet, Martijn A. J.
Holla, Micha
Biert, Jan
van Kampen, Albert
The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title_full The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title_fullStr The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title_full_unstemmed The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title_short The value of a CT scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
title_sort value of a ct scan compared to plain radiographs for the classification and treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21394519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0932-5
work_keys_str_mv AT testroetmartijnaj thevalueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT hollamicha thevalueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT biertjan thevalueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT vankampenalbert thevalueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT testroetmartijnaj valueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT hollamicha valueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT biertjan valueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures
AT vankampenalbert valueofactscancomparedtoplainradiographsfortheclassificationandtreatmentplanintibialplateaufractures