Cargando…

Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education

Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuhnigk, Olaf, Böthern, Aenne M., Reimer, Jens, Schäfer, Ingo, Biegler, Astrid, Jueptner, Markus, Gelderblom, Mathias, Harendza, Sigrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709
_version_ 1782208553461743616
author Kuhnigk, Olaf
Böthern, Aenne M.
Reimer, Jens
Schäfer, Ingo
Biegler, Astrid
Jueptner, Markus
Gelderblom, Mathias
Harendza, Sigrid
author_facet Kuhnigk, Olaf
Böthern, Aenne M.
Reimer, Jens
Schäfer, Ingo
Biegler, Astrid
Jueptner, Markus
Gelderblom, Mathias
Harendza, Sigrid
author_sort Kuhnigk, Olaf
collection PubMed
description Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a dissertation project and the influence of this project on their undergraduate studies and later career choices are not well known. Method: This study was conducted at five German universities in 2003, with a total of 437 fifth-year students participating in it. A standardised questionnaire was used to ask participants about their current or finished dissertation (group A), a dissertation they had discontinued (group B) or why they had never started a dissertation project (group C). Results: The two most important reasons for students from group A to start a dissertation were “interest in the topic” and “advantage for job applications”. Compared with group B, they mentioned “improved ability to critically appraise scientific studies” and “doing scientific work independently” significantly more often as a result of working on their dissertation. Starting a dissertation project early during undergraduate studies was correlated with a less successful outcome. Moreover, working on a dissertation significantly reduced time spent on undergraduate studies. Students from group C named the "workload of undergraduate studies" and “no time” most frequently as reasons for not having started a dissertation. Conclusion: Students who have been working successfully on a dissertation rate items regarding the acquisition of scientific research skills significantly more positively, and participation in undergraduate studies seems to be negatively affected by working on a dissertation project. Therefore, basic training in scientific research methodology should become an integrated part of the medical undergraduate curriculum, while special programs should be offered for students with a particular interest in scientific research programs or an academic career.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3140381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31403812011-08-04 Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education Kuhnigk, Olaf Böthern, Aenne M. Reimer, Jens Schäfer, Ingo Biegler, Astrid Jueptner, Markus Gelderblom, Mathias Harendza, Sigrid GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a dissertation project and the influence of this project on their undergraduate studies and later career choices are not well known. Method: This study was conducted at five German universities in 2003, with a total of 437 fifth-year students participating in it. A standardised questionnaire was used to ask participants about their current or finished dissertation (group A), a dissertation they had discontinued (group B) or why they had never started a dissertation project (group C). Results: The two most important reasons for students from group A to start a dissertation were “interest in the topic” and “advantage for job applications”. Compared with group B, they mentioned “improved ability to critically appraise scientific studies” and “doing scientific work independently” significantly more often as a result of working on their dissertation. Starting a dissertation project early during undergraduate studies was correlated with a less successful outcome. Moreover, working on a dissertation significantly reduced time spent on undergraduate studies. Students from group C named the "workload of undergraduate studies" and “no time” most frequently as reasons for not having started a dissertation. Conclusion: Students who have been working successfully on a dissertation rate items regarding the acquisition of scientific research skills significantly more positively, and participation in undergraduate studies seems to be negatively affected by working on a dissertation project. Therefore, basic training in scientific research methodology should become an integrated part of the medical undergraduate curriculum, while special programs should be offered for students with a particular interest in scientific research programs or an academic career. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2010-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3140381/ /pubmed/21818217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709 Text en Copyright © 2010 Kuhnigk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kuhnigk, Olaf
Böthern, Aenne M.
Reimer, Jens
Schäfer, Ingo
Biegler, Astrid
Jueptner, Markus
Gelderblom, Mathias
Harendza, Sigrid
Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title_full Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title_fullStr Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title_short Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
title_sort benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818217
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709
work_keys_str_mv AT kuhnigkolaf benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT bothernaennem benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT reimerjens benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT schaferingo benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT bieglerastrid benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT jueptnermarkus benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT gelderblommathias benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation
AT harendzasigrid benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation