Cargando…
Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education
Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709 |
_version_ | 1782208553461743616 |
---|---|
author | Kuhnigk, Olaf Böthern, Aenne M. Reimer, Jens Schäfer, Ingo Biegler, Astrid Jueptner, Markus Gelderblom, Mathias Harendza, Sigrid |
author_facet | Kuhnigk, Olaf Böthern, Aenne M. Reimer, Jens Schäfer, Ingo Biegler, Astrid Jueptner, Markus Gelderblom, Mathias Harendza, Sigrid |
author_sort | Kuhnigk, Olaf |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a dissertation project and the influence of this project on their undergraduate studies and later career choices are not well known. Method: This study was conducted at five German universities in 2003, with a total of 437 fifth-year students participating in it. A standardised questionnaire was used to ask participants about their current or finished dissertation (group A), a dissertation they had discontinued (group B) or why they had never started a dissertation project (group C). Results: The two most important reasons for students from group A to start a dissertation were “interest in the topic” and “advantage for job applications”. Compared with group B, they mentioned “improved ability to critically appraise scientific studies” and “doing scientific work independently” significantly more often as a result of working on their dissertation. Starting a dissertation project early during undergraduate studies was correlated with a less successful outcome. Moreover, working on a dissertation significantly reduced time spent on undergraduate studies. Students from group C named the "workload of undergraduate studies" and “no time” most frequently as reasons for not having started a dissertation. Conclusion: Students who have been working successfully on a dissertation rate items regarding the acquisition of scientific research skills significantly more positively, and participation in undergraduate studies seems to be negatively affected by working on a dissertation project. Therefore, basic training in scientific research methodology should become an integrated part of the medical undergraduate curriculum, while special programs should be offered for students with a particular interest in scientific research programs or an academic career. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3140381 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31403812011-08-04 Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education Kuhnigk, Olaf Böthern, Aenne M. Reimer, Jens Schäfer, Ingo Biegler, Astrid Jueptner, Markus Gelderblom, Mathias Harendza, Sigrid GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Objective: The integration of scientific research into medical education is a widely discussed topic. Most research training programs are offered on a voluntary basis. In Germany, it is mandatory to complete a doctoral thesis to obtain the academic title “doctor”. The reasons why students start a dissertation project and the influence of this project on their undergraduate studies and later career choices are not well known. Method: This study was conducted at five German universities in 2003, with a total of 437 fifth-year students participating in it. A standardised questionnaire was used to ask participants about their current or finished dissertation (group A), a dissertation they had discontinued (group B) or why they had never started a dissertation project (group C). Results: The two most important reasons for students from group A to start a dissertation were “interest in the topic” and “advantage for job applications”. Compared with group B, they mentioned “improved ability to critically appraise scientific studies” and “doing scientific work independently” significantly more often as a result of working on their dissertation. Starting a dissertation project early during undergraduate studies was correlated with a less successful outcome. Moreover, working on a dissertation significantly reduced time spent on undergraduate studies. Students from group C named the "workload of undergraduate studies" and “no time” most frequently as reasons for not having started a dissertation. Conclusion: Students who have been working successfully on a dissertation rate items regarding the acquisition of scientific research skills significantly more positively, and participation in undergraduate studies seems to be negatively affected by working on a dissertation project. Therefore, basic training in scientific research methodology should become an integrated part of the medical undergraduate curriculum, while special programs should be offered for students with a particular interest in scientific research programs or an academic career. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2010-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3140381/ /pubmed/21818217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709 Text en Copyright © 2010 Kuhnigk et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Kuhnigk, Olaf Böthern, Aenne M. Reimer, Jens Schäfer, Ingo Biegler, Astrid Jueptner, Markus Gelderblom, Mathias Harendza, Sigrid Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title | Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title_full | Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title_fullStr | Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title_short | Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
title_sort | benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140381/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuhnigkolaf benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT bothernaennem benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT reimerjens benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT schaferingo benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT bieglerastrid benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT jueptnermarkus benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT gelderblommathias benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation AT harendzasigrid benefitsandpitfallsofscientificresearchduringundergraduatemedicaleducation |