Cargando…

Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally

We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Kerrie A., Evans, Megan C., Di Marco, Moreno, Green, David C., Boitani, Luigi, Possingham, Hugh P., Chiozza, Federica, Rondinini, Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108
_version_ 1782208583182581760
author Wilson, Kerrie A.
Evans, Megan C.
Di Marco, Moreno
Green, David C.
Boitani, Luigi
Possingham, Hugh P.
Chiozza, Federica
Rondinini, Carlo
author_facet Wilson, Kerrie A.
Evans, Megan C.
Di Marco, Moreno
Green, David C.
Boitani, Luigi
Possingham, Hugh P.
Chiozza, Federica
Rondinini, Carlo
author_sort Wilson, Kerrie A.
collection PubMed
description We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3140730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31407302011-09-27 Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally Wilson, Kerrie A. Evans, Megan C. Di Marco, Moreno Green, David C. Boitani, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Chiozza, Federica Rondinini, Carlo Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Research Articles We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments. The Royal Society 2011-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3140730/ /pubmed/21844046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108 Text en This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Evans, Megan C.
Di Marco, Moreno
Green, David C.
Boitani, Luigi
Possingham, Hugh P.
Chiozza, Federica
Rondinini, Carlo
Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title_full Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title_fullStr Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title_short Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
title_sort prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonkerriea prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT evansmeganc prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT dimarcomoreno prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT greendavidc prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT boitaniluigi prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT possinghamhughp prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT chiozzafederica prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally
AT rondininicarlo prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally