Cargando…
Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally
We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108 |
_version_ | 1782208583182581760 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Kerrie A. Evans, Megan C. Di Marco, Moreno Green, David C. Boitani, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Chiozza, Federica Rondinini, Carlo |
author_facet | Wilson, Kerrie A. Evans, Megan C. Di Marco, Moreno Green, David C. Boitani, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Chiozza, Federica Rondinini, Carlo |
author_sort | Wilson, Kerrie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3140730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31407302011-09-27 Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally Wilson, Kerrie A. Evans, Megan C. Di Marco, Moreno Green, David C. Boitani, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Chiozza, Federica Rondinini, Carlo Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Research Articles We need to set priorities for conservation because we cannot do everything, everywhere, at the same time. We determined priority areas for investment in threat abatement actions, in both a cost-effective and spatially and temporally explicit way, for the threatened mammals of the world. Our analysis presents the first fine-resolution prioritization analysis for mammals at a global scale that accounts for the risk of habitat loss, the actions required to abate this risk, the costs of these actions and the likelihood of investment success. We evaluated the likelihood of success of investments using information on the past frequency and duration of legislative effectiveness at a country scale. The establishment of new protected areas was the action receiving the greatest investment, while restoration was never chosen. The resolution of the analysis and the incorporation of likelihood of success made little difference to this result, but affected the spatial location of these investments. The Royal Society 2011-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3140730/ /pubmed/21844046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108 Text en This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Wilson, Kerrie A. Evans, Megan C. Di Marco, Moreno Green, David C. Boitani, Luigi Possingham, Hugh P. Chiozza, Federica Rondinini, Carlo Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title | Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title_full | Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title_fullStr | Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title_short | Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
title_sort | prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globally |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21844046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonkerriea prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT evansmeganc prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT dimarcomoreno prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT greendavidc prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT boitaniluigi prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT possinghamhughp prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT chiozzafederica prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally AT rondininicarlo prioritizingconservationinvestmentsformammalspeciesglobally |