Cargando…

High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion

PURPOSE: Both “high tie” (HT) and “low tie” (LT) are well-known strategies in rectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare colonic perfusion after HT to colonic perfusion after LT. METHODS: Patients undergoing rectal resection for malignancy were included. Colonic perfusion was measured with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komen, Niels, Slieker, Juliette, de Kort, Peter, de Wilt, J. H. W., van der Harst, Erwin, Coene, Peter-Paul, Gosselink, Martijn, Tetteroo, Geert, de Graaf, Eelco, van Beek, Ton, den Toom, Rene, van Bockel, Wouter, Verhoef, Cees, Lange, Johan F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21445553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1188-6
_version_ 1782208596794146816
author Komen, Niels
Slieker, Juliette
de Kort, Peter
de Wilt, J. H. W.
van der Harst, Erwin
Coene, Peter-Paul
Gosselink, Martijn
Tetteroo, Geert
de Graaf, Eelco
van Beek, Ton
den Toom, Rene
van Bockel, Wouter
Verhoef, Cees
Lange, Johan F.
author_facet Komen, Niels
Slieker, Juliette
de Kort, Peter
de Wilt, J. H. W.
van der Harst, Erwin
Coene, Peter-Paul
Gosselink, Martijn
Tetteroo, Geert
de Graaf, Eelco
van Beek, Ton
den Toom, Rene
van Bockel, Wouter
Verhoef, Cees
Lange, Johan F.
author_sort Komen, Niels
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Both “high tie” (HT) and “low tie” (LT) are well-known strategies in rectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare colonic perfusion after HT to colonic perfusion after LT. METHODS: Patients undergoing rectal resection for malignancy were included. Colonic perfusion was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, immediately after laparotomy on the antimesenterial side of the colon segment that was to become the afferent loop (measurement A). This measurement was repeated after rectal resection (measurement B). The blood flow ratios (B/A) were compared between the HT group and the LT group. RESULTS: Blood flow was measured in 33 patients, 16 undergoing HT and 17 undergoing LT. Colonic blood flow slightly decreased in the HT group whereas the flow increased in the LT group. The blood flow ratio was significantly higher in the LT group (1.48 vs. 0.91; p = 0.04), independent of the blood pressure. CONCLUSION: This study shows the blood flow ratio to be higher in the LT group. This suggests that anastomoses may benefit from better perfusion when LT is performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3140934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31409342011-09-01 High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion Komen, Niels Slieker, Juliette de Kort, Peter de Wilt, J. H. W. van der Harst, Erwin Coene, Peter-Paul Gosselink, Martijn Tetteroo, Geert de Graaf, Eelco van Beek, Ton den Toom, Rene van Bockel, Wouter Verhoef, Cees Lange, Johan F. Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Both “high tie” (HT) and “low tie” (LT) are well-known strategies in rectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare colonic perfusion after HT to colonic perfusion after LT. METHODS: Patients undergoing rectal resection for malignancy were included. Colonic perfusion was measured with laser Doppler flowmetry, immediately after laparotomy on the antimesenterial side of the colon segment that was to become the afferent loop (measurement A). This measurement was repeated after rectal resection (measurement B). The blood flow ratios (B/A) were compared between the HT group and the LT group. RESULTS: Blood flow was measured in 33 patients, 16 undergoing HT and 17 undergoing LT. Colonic blood flow slightly decreased in the HT group whereas the flow increased in the LT group. The blood flow ratio was significantly higher in the LT group (1.48 vs. 0.91; p = 0.04), independent of the blood pressure. CONCLUSION: This study shows the blood flow ratio to be higher in the LT group. This suggests that anastomoses may benefit from better perfusion when LT is performed. Springer-Verlag 2011-03-29 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3140934/ /pubmed/21445553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1188-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Komen, Niels
Slieker, Juliette
de Kort, Peter
de Wilt, J. H. W.
van der Harst, Erwin
Coene, Peter-Paul
Gosselink, Martijn
Tetteroo, Geert
de Graaf, Eelco
van Beek, Ton
den Toom, Rene
van Bockel, Wouter
Verhoef, Cees
Lange, Johan F.
High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title_full High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title_fullStr High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title_full_unstemmed High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title_short High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
title_sort high tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3140934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21445553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1188-6
work_keys_str_mv AT komenniels hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT sliekerjuliette hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT dekortpeter hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT dewiltjhw hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT vanderharsterwin hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT coenepeterpaul hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT gosselinkmartijn hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT tetteroogeert hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT degraafeelco hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT vanbeekton hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT dentoomrene hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT vanbockelwouter hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT verhoefcees hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion
AT langejohanf hightieversuslowtieinrectalsurgerycomparisonofanastomoticperfusion