Cargando…
The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care
BACKGROUND: Contact Isolation is a common hospital infection prevention method that may improve infectious outcomes but may also hinder healthcare delivery. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of Contact Isolation on compliance with individual and composite process of care quality measures, we formed fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022190 |
_version_ | 1782208611311681536 |
---|---|
author | Morgan, Daniel J. Day, Hannah R. Harris, Anthony D. Furuno, Jon P. Perencevich, Eli N. |
author_facet | Morgan, Daniel J. Day, Hannah R. Harris, Anthony D. Furuno, Jon P. Perencevich, Eli N. |
author_sort | Morgan, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contact Isolation is a common hospital infection prevention method that may improve infectious outcomes but may also hinder healthcare delivery. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of Contact Isolation on compliance with individual and composite process of care quality measures, we formed four retrospective diagnosis-based cohorts from a 662-bed tertiary-care medical center. Each cohort contained patients evaluated for one of four Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare process measures including Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Pneumonia (PNA) and Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) from January 1, 2007 through May 30, 2009. RESULTS: The 6716-admission cohort included 1259 with AMI, 834 with CHF, 1377 with PNA and 3246 in SCIP. Contact Isolation was associated with not meeting 4 of 23 individual hospital measures (4 of 10 measures were not met for care provided while patients are typically isolated). Contact Isolation was independently associated with lower compliance with the composite pneumonia process-of-care measure (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.7). AMI, CHF and SCIP composite measures were not impacted by Contact Isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Contact Isolation was associated with lower adherence to some pneumonia quality of care process measures of care on inpatient wards but did not impact CHF, AMI or SCIP measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3141007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31410072011-08-02 The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care Morgan, Daniel J. Day, Hannah R. Harris, Anthony D. Furuno, Jon P. Perencevich, Eli N. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Contact Isolation is a common hospital infection prevention method that may improve infectious outcomes but may also hinder healthcare delivery. METHODS: To evaluate the impact of Contact Isolation on compliance with individual and composite process of care quality measures, we formed four retrospective diagnosis-based cohorts from a 662-bed tertiary-care medical center. Each cohort contained patients evaluated for one of four Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare process measures including Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Pneumonia (PNA) and Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) from January 1, 2007 through May 30, 2009. RESULTS: The 6716-admission cohort included 1259 with AMI, 834 with CHF, 1377 with PNA and 3246 in SCIP. Contact Isolation was associated with not meeting 4 of 23 individual hospital measures (4 of 10 measures were not met for care provided while patients are typically isolated). Contact Isolation was independently associated with lower compliance with the composite pneumonia process-of-care measure (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1–0.7). AMI, CHF and SCIP composite measures were not impacted by Contact Isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Contact Isolation was associated with lower adherence to some pneumonia quality of care process measures of care on inpatient wards but did not impact CHF, AMI or SCIP measures. Public Library of Science 2011-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3141007/ /pubmed/21811572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022190 Text en This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Morgan, Daniel J. Day, Hannah R. Harris, Anthony D. Furuno, Jon P. Perencevich, Eli N. The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title | The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title_full | The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title_short | The Impact of Contact Isolation on the Quality of Inpatient Hospital Care |
title_sort | impact of contact isolation on the quality of inpatient hospital care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morgandanielj theimpactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT dayhannahr theimpactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT harrisanthonyd theimpactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT furunojonp theimpactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT perencevichelin theimpactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT morgandanielj impactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT dayhannahr impactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT harrisanthonyd impactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT furunojonp impactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare AT perencevichelin impactofcontactisolationonthequalityofinpatienthospitalcare |