Cargando…

The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever

In humans, sexual dimorphism is associated with the presence of two X chromosomes in the female, whereas males possess only one X and a small and largely degenerate Y chromosome. How do men cope with having only a single X chromosome given that virtually all other chromosomal monosomies are lethal?...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morey, Céline, Avner, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002212
_version_ 1782208613551439872
author Morey, Céline
Avner, Philip
author_facet Morey, Céline
Avner, Philip
author_sort Morey, Céline
collection PubMed
description In humans, sexual dimorphism is associated with the presence of two X chromosomes in the female, whereas males possess only one X and a small and largely degenerate Y chromosome. How do men cope with having only a single X chromosome given that virtually all other chromosomal monosomies are lethal? Ironically, or even typically many might say, women and more generally female mammals contribute most to the job by shutting down one of their two X chromosomes at random. This phenomenon, called X-inactivation, was originally described some 50 years ago by Mary Lyon and has captivated an increasing number of scientists ever since. The fascination arose in part from the realisation that the inactive X corresponded to a dense heterochromatin mass called the “Barr body” whose number varied with the number of Xs within the nucleus and from the many intellectual questions that this raised: How does the cell count the X chromosomes in the nucleus and inactivate all Xs except one? What kind of molecular mechanisms are able to trigger such a profound, chromosome-wide metamorphosis? When is X-inactivation initiated? How is it transmitted to daughter cells and how is it reset during gametogenesis? This review retraces some of the crucial findings, which have led to our current understanding of a biological process that was initially considered as an exception completely distinct from conventional regulatory systems but is now viewed as a paradigm “par excellence” for epigenetic regulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31410172011-08-02 The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever Morey, Céline Avner, Philip PLoS Genet Review In humans, sexual dimorphism is associated with the presence of two X chromosomes in the female, whereas males possess only one X and a small and largely degenerate Y chromosome. How do men cope with having only a single X chromosome given that virtually all other chromosomal monosomies are lethal? Ironically, or even typically many might say, women and more generally female mammals contribute most to the job by shutting down one of their two X chromosomes at random. This phenomenon, called X-inactivation, was originally described some 50 years ago by Mary Lyon and has captivated an increasing number of scientists ever since. The fascination arose in part from the realisation that the inactive X corresponded to a dense heterochromatin mass called the “Barr body” whose number varied with the number of Xs within the nucleus and from the many intellectual questions that this raised: How does the cell count the X chromosomes in the nucleus and inactivate all Xs except one? What kind of molecular mechanisms are able to trigger such a profound, chromosome-wide metamorphosis? When is X-inactivation initiated? How is it transmitted to daughter cells and how is it reset during gametogenesis? This review retraces some of the crucial findings, which have led to our current understanding of a biological process that was initially considered as an exception completely distinct from conventional regulatory systems but is now viewed as a paradigm “par excellence” for epigenetic regulation. Public Library of Science 2011-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3141017/ /pubmed/21811421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002212 Text en Morey, Avner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Morey, Céline
Avner, Philip
The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title_full The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title_fullStr The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title_full_unstemmed The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title_short The Demoiselle of X-Inactivation: 50 Years Old and As Trendy and Mesmerising As Ever
title_sort demoiselle of x-inactivation: 50 years old and as trendy and mesmerising as ever
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002212
work_keys_str_mv AT moreyceline thedemoiselleofxinactivation50yearsoldandastrendyandmesmerisingasever
AT avnerphilip thedemoiselleofxinactivation50yearsoldandastrendyandmesmerisingasever
AT moreyceline demoiselleofxinactivation50yearsoldandastrendyandmesmerisingasever
AT avnerphilip demoiselleofxinactivation50yearsoldandastrendyandmesmerisingasever