Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study

PURPOSE: To compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-core systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal treatment was performed on 40 maxillary incisors and the samples were divided into four groups of 10 each. For three experi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makade, Chetana S., Meshram, Ganesh K., Warhadpande, Manjusha, Patil, Pravinkumar G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90
_version_ 1782208630464970752
author Makade, Chetana S.
Meshram, Ganesh K.
Warhadpande, Manjusha
Patil, Pravinkumar G.
author_facet Makade, Chetana S.
Meshram, Ganesh K.
Warhadpande, Manjusha
Patil, Pravinkumar G.
author_sort Makade, Chetana S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-core systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal treatment was performed on 40 maxillary incisors and the samples were divided into four groups of 10 each. For three experimental groups post space preparation was done and teeth were restored with cast post-core (Group B), stainless steel post with composite core (Group C) and glass fiber post with composite core using adhesive resin cement (Group D). Control group (A) samples were selected with intact coronal structure. All the samples were prepared for ideal abutment preparation. All the samples were subjected to a load of 0.5 mm/min at 130° until fracture occurred using the universal testing machine. The fracture resistance was measured and the data were analyzed statistically. The fracture above the embedded resin was considered to be favorable and the fracture below the level was considered as unfavorable. The statistical analysis of fracture resistance between different groups was carried out with t-test. For the mode of failure the statistical analysis was carried out by Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-Square test. RESULTS: For experimental group Vs control group the fracture resistance values showed significant differences (P<.05). For the mode of failure the chi-square value is 16.1610, which means highly significant (P=.0009) statistically. CONCLUSION: Endodontically treated teeth without post core system showed the least fracture resistance demonstrating the need to reinforce the tooth. Stainless steel post with composite core showed the highest fracture resistance among all the experimental groups. Teeth restored with the Glass fiber post showed the most favorable fractures making them more amenable to the re-treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31411252011-08-03 A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study Makade, Chetana S. Meshram, Ganesh K. Warhadpande, Manjusha Patil, Pravinkumar G. J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the fracture resistance and the mode of failure of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-core systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canal treatment was performed on 40 maxillary incisors and the samples were divided into four groups of 10 each. For three experimental groups post space preparation was done and teeth were restored with cast post-core (Group B), stainless steel post with composite core (Group C) and glass fiber post with composite core using adhesive resin cement (Group D). Control group (A) samples were selected with intact coronal structure. All the samples were prepared for ideal abutment preparation. All the samples were subjected to a load of 0.5 mm/min at 130° until fracture occurred using the universal testing machine. The fracture resistance was measured and the data were analyzed statistically. The fracture above the embedded resin was considered to be favorable and the fracture below the level was considered as unfavorable. The statistical analysis of fracture resistance between different groups was carried out with t-test. For the mode of failure the statistical analysis was carried out by Kruskal-Wallis test and Chi-Square test. RESULTS: For experimental group Vs control group the fracture resistance values showed significant differences (P<.05). For the mode of failure the chi-square value is 16.1610, which means highly significant (P=.0009) statistically. CONCLUSION: Endodontically treated teeth without post core system showed the least fracture resistance demonstrating the need to reinforce the tooth. Stainless steel post with composite core showed the highest fracture resistance among all the experimental groups. Teeth restored with the Glass fiber post showed the most favorable fractures making them more amenable to the re-treatment. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2011-06 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3141125/ /pubmed/21814618 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90 Text en © 2011 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Makade, Chetana S.
Meshram, Ganesh K.
Warhadpande, Manjusha
Patil, Pravinkumar G.
A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post core systems - an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814618
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.90
work_keys_str_mv AT makadechetanas acomparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT meshramganeshk acomparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT warhadpandemanjusha acomparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT patilpravinkumarg acomparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT makadechetanas comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT meshramganeshk comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT warhadpandemanjusha comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy
AT patilpravinkumarg comparativeevaluationoffractureresistanceofendodonticallytreatedteethrestoredwithdifferentpostcoresystemsaninvitrostudy