Cargando…

Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?

Needle-through-needle combined spinal–epidural (CSE) may cause significant delay in patient positioning resulting in settling down of spinal anaesthetic and unacceptably low block level. Bilateral hip flexion has been shown to extend the spinal block by flattening lumbar lordosis. However, patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohta, Medha, Agarwal, Deepti, Sethi, AK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21808396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.82668
_version_ 1782208635584118784
author Mohta, Medha
Agarwal, Deepti
Sethi, AK
author_facet Mohta, Medha
Agarwal, Deepti
Sethi, AK
author_sort Mohta, Medha
collection PubMed
description Needle-through-needle combined spinal–epidural (CSE) may cause significant delay in patient positioning resulting in settling down of spinal anaesthetic and unacceptably low block level. Bilateral hip flexion has been shown to extend the spinal block by flattening lumbar lordosis. However, patients with lower limb fractures cannot flex their injured limb. This study was conducted to find out if unilateral hip flexion could extend the level of spinal anaesthesia following a prolonged CSE technique. Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II males with unilateral femur fracture were randomly allocated to Control or Flexion groups. Needle-through-needle CSE was performed in the sitting position at L2-3 interspace and 2.6 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine injected intrathecally. Patients were made supine 4 min after the spinal injection or later if epidural placement took longer. The Control group patients (n=25) lay supine with legs straight, whereas the Flexion group patients (n=25) had their uninjured hip and knee flexed for 5 min. Levels of sensory and motor blocks and time to epidural drug requirement were recorded. There was no significant difference in sensory levels at different time-points; maximum sensory and motor blocks; times to achieve maximum blocks; and time to epidural drug requirement in two groups. However, four patients in the Control group in contrast to none in the Flexion group required epidural drug before start of surgery. Moreover, in the Control group four patients took longer than 30 min to achieve maximum sensory block. To conclude, unilateral hip flexion did not extend the spinal anaesthetic level; however, further studies are required to explore the potential benefits of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31411482011-08-01 Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique? Mohta, Medha Agarwal, Deepti Sethi, AK Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation Needle-through-needle combined spinal–epidural (CSE) may cause significant delay in patient positioning resulting in settling down of spinal anaesthetic and unacceptably low block level. Bilateral hip flexion has been shown to extend the spinal block by flattening lumbar lordosis. However, patients with lower limb fractures cannot flex their injured limb. This study was conducted to find out if unilateral hip flexion could extend the level of spinal anaesthesia following a prolonged CSE technique. Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II males with unilateral femur fracture were randomly allocated to Control or Flexion groups. Needle-through-needle CSE was performed in the sitting position at L2-3 interspace and 2.6 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine injected intrathecally. Patients were made supine 4 min after the spinal injection or later if epidural placement took longer. The Control group patients (n=25) lay supine with legs straight, whereas the Flexion group patients (n=25) had their uninjured hip and knee flexed for 5 min. Levels of sensory and motor blocks and time to epidural drug requirement were recorded. There was no significant difference in sensory levels at different time-points; maximum sensory and motor blocks; times to achieve maximum blocks; and time to epidural drug requirement in two groups. However, four patients in the Control group in contrast to none in the Flexion group required epidural drug before start of surgery. Moreover, in the Control group four patients took longer than 30 min to achieve maximum sensory block. To conclude, unilateral hip flexion did not extend the spinal anaesthetic level; however, further studies are required to explore the potential benefits of this technique. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3141148/ /pubmed/21808396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.82668 Text en © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Mohta, Medha
Agarwal, Deepti
Sethi, AK
Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title_full Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title_fullStr Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title_full_unstemmed Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title_short Does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
title_sort does unilateral hip flexion increase the spinal anaesthetic level during combined spinal–epidural technique?
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21808396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.82668
work_keys_str_mv AT mohtamedha doesunilateralhipflexionincreasethespinalanaestheticlevelduringcombinedspinalepiduraltechnique
AT agarwaldeepti doesunilateralhipflexionincreasethespinalanaestheticlevelduringcombinedspinalepiduraltechnique
AT sethiak doesunilateralhipflexionincreasethespinalanaestheticlevelduringcombinedspinalepiduraltechnique