Cargando…
The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US
BACKGROUND: Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue, often a result of surgery, that form between internal organs and tissues, joining them together abnormally. Postoperative adhesions frequently occur following abdominal surgery, and are associated with a large economic burden. This study examin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21658255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-13 |
_version_ | 1782208663295885312 |
---|---|
author | Sikirica, Vanja Bapat, Bela Candrilli, Sean D Davis, Keith L Wilson, Malcolm Johns, Alan |
author_facet | Sikirica, Vanja Bapat, Bela Candrilli, Sean D Davis, Keith L Wilson, Malcolm Johns, Alan |
author_sort | Sikirica, Vanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue, often a result of surgery, that form between internal organs and tissues, joining them together abnormally. Postoperative adhesions frequently occur following abdominal surgery, and are associated with a large economic burden. This study examines the inpatient burden of adhesiolysis in the United States (i.e., number and rate of events, cost, length of stay [LOS]). METHODS: Hospital discharge data for patients with primary and secondary adhesiolysis were analyzed using the 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Procedures were aggregated by body system. RESULTS: We identified 351,777 adhesiolysis-related hospitalizations: 23.2% for primary and 76.8% for secondary adhesiolysis. The average LOS was 7.8 days for primary adhesiolysis. We found that 967,332 days of care were attributed to adhesiolysis-related procedures, with inpatient expenditures totaling $2.3 billion ($1.4 billion for primary adhesiolysis; $926 million for secondary adhesiolysis). Hospitalizations for adhesiolysis increased steadily by age and were higher for women. Of secondary adhesiolysis procedures, 46.3% involved the female reproductive tract, resulting in 57,005 additional days of care and $220 million in attributable costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis remain an important surgical problem in the United States. Hospitalization for this condition leads to high direct surgical costs, which should be of interest to providers and payers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3141363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31413632011-07-23 The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US Sikirica, Vanja Bapat, Bela Candrilli, Sean D Davis, Keith L Wilson, Malcolm Johns, Alan BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Adhesions are fibrous bands of scar tissue, often a result of surgery, that form between internal organs and tissues, joining them together abnormally. Postoperative adhesions frequently occur following abdominal surgery, and are associated with a large economic burden. This study examines the inpatient burden of adhesiolysis in the United States (i.e., number and rate of events, cost, length of stay [LOS]). METHODS: Hospital discharge data for patients with primary and secondary adhesiolysis were analyzed using the 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Procedures were aggregated by body system. RESULTS: We identified 351,777 adhesiolysis-related hospitalizations: 23.2% for primary and 76.8% for secondary adhesiolysis. The average LOS was 7.8 days for primary adhesiolysis. We found that 967,332 days of care were attributed to adhesiolysis-related procedures, with inpatient expenditures totaling $2.3 billion ($1.4 billion for primary adhesiolysis; $926 million for secondary adhesiolysis). Hospitalizations for adhesiolysis increased steadily by age and were higher for women. Of secondary adhesiolysis procedures, 46.3% involved the female reproductive tract, resulting in 57,005 additional days of care and $220 million in attributable costs. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesiolysis remain an important surgical problem in the United States. Hospitalization for this condition leads to high direct surgical costs, which should be of interest to providers and payers. BioMed Central 2011-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3141363/ /pubmed/21658255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-13 Text en Copyright ©2011 Sikirica et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sikirica, Vanja Bapat, Bela Candrilli, Sean D Davis, Keith L Wilson, Malcolm Johns, Alan The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title | The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title_full | The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title_fullStr | The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title_full_unstemmed | The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title_short | The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US |
title_sort | inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the us |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21658255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-11-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sikiricavanja theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT bapatbela theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT candrilliseand theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT daviskeithl theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT wilsonmalcolm theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT johnsalan theinpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT sikiricavanja inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT bapatbela inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT candrilliseand inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT daviskeithl inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT wilsonmalcolm inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus AT johnsalan inpatientburdenofabdominalandgynecologicaladhesiolysisintheus |