Cargando…

Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory

BACKGROUND: Maintaining dignity, the quality of being worthy of esteem or respect, is considered as a goal of palliative care. The aim of this study was to analyse the construct of personal dignity and to assess the content validity of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in people with an advance di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albers, Gwenda, Pasman, H Roeline W, Rurup, Mette L, de Vet, Henrica CW, Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-45
_version_ 1782208665315442688
author Albers, Gwenda
Pasman, H Roeline W
Rurup, Mette L
de Vet, Henrica CW
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D
author_facet Albers, Gwenda
Pasman, H Roeline W
Rurup, Mette L
de Vet, Henrica CW
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D
author_sort Albers, Gwenda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maintaining dignity, the quality of being worthy of esteem or respect, is considered as a goal of palliative care. The aim of this study was to analyse the construct of personal dignity and to assess the content validity of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in people with an advance directive in the Netherlands. METHODS: Data were collected within the framework of an advance directives cohort study. This cohort study is aiming to get a better insight into how decisions are made at the end of life with regard to advance directives in the Netherlands. One half of the cohort (n = 2404) received an open-ended question concerning factors relevant to dignity. Content labels were assigned to issues mentioned in the responses to the open-ended question. The other half of the cohort (n = 2537) received a written questionnaire including the PDI. The relevance and comprehensiveness of the PDI items were assessed with the COSMIN checklist ('COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments'). RESULTS: The majority of the PDI items were found to be relevant for the construct to be measured, the study population, and the purpose of the study but the items were not completely comprehensive. The responses to the open-ended question indicated that communication and care-related aspects were also important for dignity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the PDI items were relevant for people with an advance directive in the Netherlands. The comprehensiveness of the items can be improved by including items concerning communication and care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31413722011-07-23 Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory Albers, Gwenda Pasman, H Roeline W Rurup, Mette L de Vet, Henrica CW Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Maintaining dignity, the quality of being worthy of esteem or respect, is considered as a goal of palliative care. The aim of this study was to analyse the construct of personal dignity and to assess the content validity of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in people with an advance directive in the Netherlands. METHODS: Data were collected within the framework of an advance directives cohort study. This cohort study is aiming to get a better insight into how decisions are made at the end of life with regard to advance directives in the Netherlands. One half of the cohort (n = 2404) received an open-ended question concerning factors relevant to dignity. Content labels were assigned to issues mentioned in the responses to the open-ended question. The other half of the cohort (n = 2537) received a written questionnaire including the PDI. The relevance and comprehensiveness of the PDI items were assessed with the COSMIN checklist ('COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments'). RESULTS: The majority of the PDI items were found to be relevant for the construct to be measured, the study population, and the purpose of the study but the items were not completely comprehensive. The responses to the open-ended question indicated that communication and care-related aspects were also important for dignity. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the PDI items were relevant for people with an advance directive in the Netherlands. The comprehensiveness of the items can be improved by including items concerning communication and care. BioMed Central 2011-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3141372/ /pubmed/21682924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-45 Text en Copyright ©2011 Albers et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Albers, Gwenda
Pasman, H Roeline W
Rurup, Mette L
de Vet, Henrica CW
Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D
Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title_full Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title_fullStr Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title_short Analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
title_sort analysis of the construct of dignity and content validity of the patient dignity inventory
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-45
work_keys_str_mv AT albersgwenda analysisoftheconstructofdignityandcontentvalidityofthepatientdignityinventory
AT pasmanhroelinew analysisoftheconstructofdignityandcontentvalidityofthepatientdignityinventory
AT rurupmettel analysisoftheconstructofdignityandcontentvalidityofthepatientdignityinventory
AT devethenricacw analysisoftheconstructofdignityandcontentvalidityofthepatientdignityinventory
AT onwuteakaphilipsenbregjed analysisoftheconstructofdignityandcontentvalidityofthepatientdignityinventory