Cargando…
An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro
BACKGROUND: Integrated networks hold great promise in a variety of contexts. In a recent study, we have combined expression and interaction data to identify a putative network underlying early human organogenesis that contains two modules, the stemness-relevant module (hStemModule) and the different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-108 |
_version_ | 1782208675954294784 |
---|---|
author | Fang , Hai Jin, Wen Yang, Ying Jin, Ying Zhang, Ji Wang, Kankan |
author_facet | Fang , Hai Jin, Wen Yang, Ying Jin, Ying Zhang, Ji Wang, Kankan |
author_sort | Fang , Hai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Integrated networks hold great promise in a variety of contexts. In a recent study, we have combined expression and interaction data to identify a putative network underlying early human organogenesis that contains two modules, the stemness-relevant module (hStemModule) and the differentiation-relevant module (hDiffModule). However, owing to its hypothetical nature, it remains unclear whether this network allows for comparative transcriptome analysis to advance our understanding of early human development, both in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: Based on this integrated network, we here report comparisons with the context-dependent transcriptome data from a variety of sources. By viewing the network and its two modules as gene sets and conducting gene set enrichment analysis, we demonstrate the network's utility as a quantitative monitor of the stem potential versus the differentiation potential. During early human organogenesis, the hStemModule reflects the generality of a gradual loss of the stem potential. The hDiffModule indicates the stage-specific differentiation potential and is therefore not suitable for depicting an extended developmental window. Processing of cultured cells of different types further revealed that the hStemModule is a general indicator that distinguishes different cell types in terms of their stem potential. In contrast, the hDiffModule cannot distinguish between differentiated cells of different types but is able to predict differences in the differentiation potential of pluripotent cells of different origins. We also observed a significant positive correlation between each of these two modules and early embryoid bodies (EBs), which are used as in vitro differentiation models. Despite this, the network-oriented comparisons showed considerable differences between the developing embryos and the EBs that were cultured in vitro over time to try to mimic in vivo processes. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend the use of these two modules either when pluripotent cell types of different origins are involved or when the comparisons made are constrained to the in vivo embryos during early human organogenesis (and an equivalent in vitro differentiation models). Network-based comparative transcriptome analysis will contribute to an increase in knowledge about human embryogenesis, particularly when only transcriptome data are currently available. These advances will add an extra dimension to network applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3141417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31414172011-07-23 An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro Fang , Hai Jin, Wen Yang, Ying Jin, Ying Zhang, Ji Wang, Kankan BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Integrated networks hold great promise in a variety of contexts. In a recent study, we have combined expression and interaction data to identify a putative network underlying early human organogenesis that contains two modules, the stemness-relevant module (hStemModule) and the differentiation-relevant module (hDiffModule). However, owing to its hypothetical nature, it remains unclear whether this network allows for comparative transcriptome analysis to advance our understanding of early human development, both in vivo and in vitro. RESULTS: Based on this integrated network, we here report comparisons with the context-dependent transcriptome data from a variety of sources. By viewing the network and its two modules as gene sets and conducting gene set enrichment analysis, we demonstrate the network's utility as a quantitative monitor of the stem potential versus the differentiation potential. During early human organogenesis, the hStemModule reflects the generality of a gradual loss of the stem potential. The hDiffModule indicates the stage-specific differentiation potential and is therefore not suitable for depicting an extended developmental window. Processing of cultured cells of different types further revealed that the hStemModule is a general indicator that distinguishes different cell types in terms of their stem potential. In contrast, the hDiffModule cannot distinguish between differentiated cells of different types but is able to predict differences in the differentiation potential of pluripotent cells of different origins. We also observed a significant positive correlation between each of these two modules and early embryoid bodies (EBs), which are used as in vitro differentiation models. Despite this, the network-oriented comparisons showed considerable differences between the developing embryos and the EBs that were cultured in vitro over time to try to mimic in vivo processes. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend the use of these two modules either when pluripotent cell types of different origins are involved or when the comparisons made are constrained to the in vivo embryos during early human organogenesis (and an equivalent in vitro differentiation models). Network-based comparative transcriptome analysis will contribute to an increase in knowledge about human embryogenesis, particularly when only transcriptome data are currently available. These advances will add an extra dimension to network applications. BioMed Central 2011-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3141417/ /pubmed/21733158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-108 Text en Copyright ©2011 Fang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fang , Hai Jin, Wen Yang, Ying Jin, Ying Zhang, Ji Wang, Kankan An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title | An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title_full | An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title_fullStr | An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title_full_unstemmed | An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title_short | An organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
title_sort | organogenesis network-based comparative transcriptome analysis for understanding early human development in vivo and in vitro |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21733158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanghai anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT jinwen anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT yangying anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT jinying anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT zhangji anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT wangkankan anorganogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT fanghai organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT jinwen organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT yangying organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT jinying organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT zhangji organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro AT wangkankan organogenesisnetworkbasedcomparativetranscriptomeanalysisforunderstandingearlyhumandevelopmentinvivoandinvitro |