Cargando…

Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results

BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment of a pelvic recurrence in a previously irradiated area is surgery. Unfortunately, few patients are deemed operable, often due to the location of the recurrence, usually too close to the iliac vessels, or the associated surgical morbidity. The objective of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewas, Sylvain, Bibault, Jean Emmanuel, Mirabel, Xavier, Nickers, Philippe, Castelain, Bernard, Lacornerie, Thomas, Jarraya, Hajer, Lartigau, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21699690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-77
_version_ 1782208701138993152
author Dewas, Sylvain
Bibault, Jean Emmanuel
Mirabel, Xavier
Nickers, Philippe
Castelain, Bernard
Lacornerie, Thomas
Jarraya, Hajer
Lartigau, Eric
author_facet Dewas, Sylvain
Bibault, Jean Emmanuel
Mirabel, Xavier
Nickers, Philippe
Castelain, Bernard
Lacornerie, Thomas
Jarraya, Hajer
Lartigau, Eric
author_sort Dewas, Sylvain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment of a pelvic recurrence in a previously irradiated area is surgery. Unfortunately, few patients are deemed operable, often due to the location of the recurrence, usually too close to the iliac vessels, or the associated surgical morbidity. The objective of this study is to test the viability of robotic image-guided radiotherapy as an alternative treatment in inoperable cases. METHODS: Sixteen patients previously treated with radiotherapy were reirradiated with CyberKnife(® )for lateral pelvic lesions. Recurrences of primary rectal cancer (4 patients), anal canal (6), uterine cervix cancer (4), endometrial cancer (1), and bladder carcinoma (1) were treated. The median dose of the previous treatment was 45 Gy (EqD2 range: 20 to 96 Gy). A total dose of 36 Gy in six fractions was delivered with the CyberKnife over three weeks. The responses were evaluated according to RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.6 months (1.9 to 20.5 months). The actuarial local control rate was 51.4% at one year. Median disease-free survival was 8.3 months after CyberKnife treatment. The actuarial one-year survival rate was 46%. Acute tolerance was limited to digestive grade 1 and 2 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy can offer a short and well-tolerated treatment for lateral pelvic recurrences in previously irradiated areas in patients otherwise not treatable. Efficacy and toxicity need to be evaluated over the long term, but initial results are encouraging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31415262011-07-23 Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results Dewas, Sylvain Bibault, Jean Emmanuel Mirabel, Xavier Nickers, Philippe Castelain, Bernard Lacornerie, Thomas Jarraya, Hajer Lartigau, Eric Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment of a pelvic recurrence in a previously irradiated area is surgery. Unfortunately, few patients are deemed operable, often due to the location of the recurrence, usually too close to the iliac vessels, or the associated surgical morbidity. The objective of this study is to test the viability of robotic image-guided radiotherapy as an alternative treatment in inoperable cases. METHODS: Sixteen patients previously treated with radiotherapy were reirradiated with CyberKnife(® )for lateral pelvic lesions. Recurrences of primary rectal cancer (4 patients), anal canal (6), uterine cervix cancer (4), endometrial cancer (1), and bladder carcinoma (1) were treated. The median dose of the previous treatment was 45 Gy (EqD2 range: 20 to 96 Gy). A total dose of 36 Gy in six fractions was delivered with the CyberKnife over three weeks. The responses were evaluated according to RECIST criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 10.6 months (1.9 to 20.5 months). The actuarial local control rate was 51.4% at one year. Median disease-free survival was 8.3 months after CyberKnife treatment. The actuarial one-year survival rate was 46%. Acute tolerance was limited to digestive grade 1 and 2 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy can offer a short and well-tolerated treatment for lateral pelvic recurrences in previously irradiated areas in patients otherwise not treatable. Efficacy and toxicity need to be evaluated over the long term, but initial results are encouraging. BioMed Central 2011-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3141526/ /pubmed/21699690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-77 Text en Copyright ©2011 Dewas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Dewas, Sylvain
Bibault, Jean Emmanuel
Mirabel, Xavier
Nickers, Philippe
Castelain, Bernard
Lacornerie, Thomas
Jarraya, Hajer
Lartigau, Eric
Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title_full Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title_fullStr Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title_full_unstemmed Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title_short Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
title_sort robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21699690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-77
work_keys_str_mv AT dewassylvain roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT bibaultjeanemmanuel roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT mirabelxavier roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT nickersphilippe roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT castelainbernard roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT lacorneriethomas roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT jarrayahajer roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults
AT lartigaueric roboticimageguidedreirradiationoflateralpelvicrecurrencespreliminaryresults