Cargando…

Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Resting mosquitoes can easily be collected using an aspirating device. The most commonly used mechanical aspirator is the CDC Backpack aspirator. Recently, a simple, and low-cost aspirator called the Prokopack has been devised and proved to have comparable performance. The following stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maia, Marta F, Robinson, Ailie, John, Alex, Mgando, Joseph, Simfukwe, Emmanuel, Moore, Sarah J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-124
_version_ 1782208747000561664
author Maia, Marta F
Robinson, Ailie
John, Alex
Mgando, Joseph
Simfukwe, Emmanuel
Moore, Sarah J
author_facet Maia, Marta F
Robinson, Ailie
John, Alex
Mgando, Joseph
Simfukwe, Emmanuel
Moore, Sarah J
author_sort Maia, Marta F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resting mosquitoes can easily be collected using an aspirating device. The most commonly used mechanical aspirator is the CDC Backpack aspirator. Recently, a simple, and low-cost aspirator called the Prokopack has been devised and proved to have comparable performance. The following study evaluates the Prokopack aspirator compared to the CDC backpack aspirator when sampling resting mosquitoes in rural Tanzania. METHODS: Mosquitoes were sampled in- and outdoors of 48 typical rural African households using both aspirators. The aspirators were rotated between collectors and households in a randomized, Latin Square design. Outdoor collections were performed using artificial resting places (large barrel and car tyre), underneath the outdoor kitchen (kibanda) roof and from a drop-net. Data were analysed with generalized linear models. RESULTS: The number of mosquitoes collected using the CDC Backpack and the Prokopack aspirator were not significantly different both in- and outdoors (indoors p = 0.735; large barrel p = 0.867; car tyre p = 0.418; kibanda p = 0.519). The Prokopack was superior for sampling of drop-nets due to its smaller size. The number mosquitoes collected per technician was more consistent when using the Prokopack aspirator. The Prokopack was more user-friendly: technicians preferred using the it over the CDC backpack aspirator as it weighs considerably less, retains its charge for longer and is easier to manoeuvre. CONCLUSIONS: The Prokopack proved in the field to be more advantageous than the CDC Backpack aspirator. It can be self assembled using simple, low-cost and easily attainable materials. This device is a useful tool for researchers or vector-control surveillance programs operating in rural Africa, as it is far simpler and quicker than traditional means of sampling resting mosquitoes. Further longitudinal evaluations of the Prokopack aspirator versus the gold standard pyrethrum spray catch for indoor resting catches are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31417452011-07-23 Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania Maia, Marta F Robinson, Ailie John, Alex Mgando, Joseph Simfukwe, Emmanuel Moore, Sarah J Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Resting mosquitoes can easily be collected using an aspirating device. The most commonly used mechanical aspirator is the CDC Backpack aspirator. Recently, a simple, and low-cost aspirator called the Prokopack has been devised and proved to have comparable performance. The following study evaluates the Prokopack aspirator compared to the CDC backpack aspirator when sampling resting mosquitoes in rural Tanzania. METHODS: Mosquitoes were sampled in- and outdoors of 48 typical rural African households using both aspirators. The aspirators were rotated between collectors and households in a randomized, Latin Square design. Outdoor collections were performed using artificial resting places (large barrel and car tyre), underneath the outdoor kitchen (kibanda) roof and from a drop-net. Data were analysed with generalized linear models. RESULTS: The number of mosquitoes collected using the CDC Backpack and the Prokopack aspirator were not significantly different both in- and outdoors (indoors p = 0.735; large barrel p = 0.867; car tyre p = 0.418; kibanda p = 0.519). The Prokopack was superior for sampling of drop-nets due to its smaller size. The number mosquitoes collected per technician was more consistent when using the Prokopack aspirator. The Prokopack was more user-friendly: technicians preferred using the it over the CDC backpack aspirator as it weighs considerably less, retains its charge for longer and is easier to manoeuvre. CONCLUSIONS: The Prokopack proved in the field to be more advantageous than the CDC Backpack aspirator. It can be self assembled using simple, low-cost and easily attainable materials. This device is a useful tool for researchers or vector-control surveillance programs operating in rural Africa, as it is far simpler and quicker than traditional means of sampling resting mosquitoes. Further longitudinal evaluations of the Prokopack aspirator versus the gold standard pyrethrum spray catch for indoor resting catches are recommended. BioMed Central 2011-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3141745/ /pubmed/21718464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-124 Text en Copyright ©2011 Maia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Maia, Marta F
Robinson, Ailie
John, Alex
Mgando, Joseph
Simfukwe, Emmanuel
Moore, Sarah J
Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title_full Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title_fullStr Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title_short Comparison of the CDC Backpack aspirator and the Prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern Tanzania
title_sort comparison of the cdc backpack aspirator and the prokopack aspirator for sampling indoor- and outdoor-resting mosquitoes in southern tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21718464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-124
work_keys_str_mv AT maiamartaf comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania
AT robinsonailie comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania
AT johnalex comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania
AT mgandojoseph comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania
AT simfukweemmanuel comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania
AT mooresarahj comparisonofthecdcbackpackaspiratorandtheprokopackaspiratorforsamplingindoorandoutdoorrestingmosquitoesinsoutherntanzania