Cargando…

A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study

BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggarwal, Rakesh, Gupte, Nikhil, Kass, Nancy, Taylor, Holly, Ali, Joseph, Bhan, Anant, Aggarwal, Amita, Sisson, Stephen D, Kanchanaraksa, Sukon, McKenzie-White, Jane, McGready, John, Miotti, Paolo, Bollinger, Robert C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37
_version_ 1782208758255976448
author Aggarwal, Rakesh
Gupte, Nikhil
Kass, Nancy
Taylor, Holly
Ali, Joseph
Bhan, Anant
Aggarwal, Amita
Sisson, Stephen D
Kanchanaraksa, Sukon
McKenzie-White, Jane
McGready, John
Miotti, Paolo
Bollinger, Robert C
author_facet Aggarwal, Rakesh
Gupte, Nikhil
Kass, Nancy
Taylor, Holly
Ali, Joseph
Bhan, Anant
Aggarwal, Amita
Sisson, Stephen D
Kanchanaraksa, Sukon
McKenzie-White, Jane
McGready, John
Miotti, Paolo
Bollinger, Robert C
author_sort Aggarwal, Rakesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses. METHODS: Subjects: Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Intervention: Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3141795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31417952011-07-23 A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study Aggarwal, Rakesh Gupte, Nikhil Kass, Nancy Taylor, Holly Ali, Joseph Bhan, Anant Aggarwal, Amita Sisson, Stephen D Kanchanaraksa, Sukon McKenzie-White, Jane McGready, John Miotti, Paolo Bollinger, Robert C BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses. METHODS: Subjects: Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Intervention: Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings. BioMed Central 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3141795/ /pubmed/21682858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 Text en Copyright ©2011 Aggarwal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aggarwal, Rakesh
Gupte, Nikhil
Kass, Nancy
Taylor, Holly
Ali, Joseph
Bhan, Anant
Aggarwal, Amita
Sisson, Stephen D
Kanchanaraksa, Sukon
McKenzie-White, Jane
McGready, John
Miotti, Paolo
Bollinger, Robert C
A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title_full A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title_short A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
title_sort comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37
work_keys_str_mv AT aggarwalrakesh acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT guptenikhil acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT kassnancy acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT taylorholly acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT alijoseph acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT bhananant acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT aggarwalamita acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT sissonstephend acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT kanchanaraksasukon acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT mckenziewhitejane acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT mcgreadyjohn acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT miottipaolo acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT bollingerrobertc acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT aggarwalrakesh comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT guptenikhil comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT kassnancy comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT taylorholly comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT alijoseph comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT bhananant comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT aggarwalamita comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT sissonstephend comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT kanchanaraksasukon comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT mckenziewhitejane comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT mcgreadyjohn comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT miottipaolo comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy
AT bollingerrobertc comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy