Cargando…
A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study
BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biost...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 |
_version_ | 1782208758255976448 |
---|---|
author | Aggarwal, Rakesh Gupte, Nikhil Kass, Nancy Taylor, Holly Ali, Joseph Bhan, Anant Aggarwal, Amita Sisson, Stephen D Kanchanaraksa, Sukon McKenzie-White, Jane McGready, John Miotti, Paolo Bollinger, Robert C |
author_facet | Aggarwal, Rakesh Gupte, Nikhil Kass, Nancy Taylor, Holly Ali, Joseph Bhan, Anant Aggarwal, Amita Sisson, Stephen D Kanchanaraksa, Sukon McKenzie-White, Jane McGready, John Miotti, Paolo Bollinger, Robert C |
author_sort | Aggarwal, Rakesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses. METHODS: Subjects: Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Intervention: Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3141795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31417952011-07-23 A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study Aggarwal, Rakesh Gupte, Nikhil Kass, Nancy Taylor, Holly Ali, Joseph Bhan, Anant Aggarwal, Amita Sisson, Stephen D Kanchanaraksa, Sukon McKenzie-White, Jane McGready, John Miotti, Paolo Bollinger, Robert C BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Distance learning may be useful for building health research capacity. However, evidence that it can improve knowledge and skills in health research, particularly in resource-poor settings, is limited. We compared the impact and acceptability of teaching two distinct content areas, Biostatistics and Research Ethics, through either on-line distance learning format or traditional on-site training, in a randomized study in India. Our objective was to determine whether on-line courses in Biostatistics and Research Ethics could achieve similar improvements in knowledge, as traditional on-site, classroom-based courses. METHODS: Subjects: Volunteer Indian scientists were randomly assigned to one of two arms. Intervention: Students in Arm 1 attended a 3.5-day on-site course in Biostatistics and completed a 3.5-week on-line course in Research Ethics. Students in Arm 2 attended a 3.5-week on-line course in Biostatistics and 3.5-day on-site course in Research Ethics. For the two course formats, learning objectives, course contents and knowledge tests were identical. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement in knowledge immediately and 3-months after course completion, compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms (n = 29 each). Median knowledge score for Biostatistics increased from a baseline of 49% to 64% (p < 0.001) 3 months after the on-site course, and from 48% to 63% (p = 0.009) after the on-line course. For the on-site Research Ethics course, median score increased from 69% to 83% (p = 0.005), and for the on-line Research Ethics course from 62% to 80% (p < 0.001). Three months after the course, median gains in knowledge scores remained similar for the on-site and on-line platforms for both Biostatistics (16% vs. 12%; p = 0.59) and Research Ethics (17% vs. 13%; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: On-line and on-site training formats led to marked and similar improvements of knowledge in Biostatistics and Research Ethics. This, combined with logistical and cost advantages of on-line training, may make on-line courses particularly useful for expanding health research capacity in resource-limited settings. BioMed Central 2011-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3141795/ /pubmed/21682858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 Text en Copyright ©2011 Aggarwal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aggarwal, Rakesh Gupte, Nikhil Kass, Nancy Taylor, Holly Ali, Joseph Bhan, Anant Aggarwal, Amita Sisson, Stephen D Kanchanaraksa, Sukon McKenzie-White, Jane McGready, John Miotti, Paolo Bollinger, Robert C A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title | A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title_full | A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title_short | A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study |
title_sort | comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-37 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aggarwalrakesh acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT guptenikhil acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT kassnancy acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT taylorholly acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT alijoseph acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT bhananant acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT aggarwalamita acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT sissonstephend acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT kanchanaraksasukon acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT mckenziewhitejane acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT mcgreadyjohn acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT miottipaolo acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT bollingerrobertc acomparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT aggarwalrakesh comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT guptenikhil comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT kassnancy comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT taylorholly comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT alijoseph comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT bhananant comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT aggarwalamita comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT sissonstephend comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT kanchanaraksasukon comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT mckenziewhitejane comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT mcgreadyjohn comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT miottipaolo comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy AT bollingerrobertc comparisonofonlineversusonsitetraininginhealthresearchmethodologyarandomizedstudy |