Cargando…

Validation of the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Risk Score in the TrialNet Natural History Study

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the accuracy of the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Risk Score (DPTRS), developed from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1), in the TrialNet Natural History Study (TNNHS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prediction accuracy of the DPTRS was assessed with receiver-operati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sosenko, Jay M., Skyler, Jay S., Mahon, Jeffrey, Krischer, Jeffrey P., Beam, Craig A., Boulware, David C., Greenbaum, Carla J., Rafkin, Lisa E., Cowie, Catherine, Cuthbertson, David, Palmer, Jerry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21680724
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0641
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We assessed the accuracy of the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 Risk Score (DPTRS), developed from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1), in the TrialNet Natural History Study (TNNHS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prediction accuracy of the DPTRS was assessed with receiver-operating characteristic curve areas. The type 1 diabetes cumulative incidence within the DPTRS intervals was compared between the TNNHS and DPT-1 cohorts. RESULTS: Receiver-operating characteristic curve areas for the DPTRS were substantial in the TNNHS (P < 0.001 at both 2 and 3 years). The type 1 diabetes cumulative incidence did not differ significantly between the TNNHS and DPT-1 cohorts within DPTRS intervals. In the TNNHS, 2-year and 3-year risks were low for DPTRS intervals <6.50 (<0.10 and <0.20, respectively). Thresholds ≥7.50 were indicative of high risk in both cohorts (2-year risks: 0.49 in the TNNHS and 0.51 in DPT-1). CONCLUSIONS: The DPTRS is an accurate and robust predictor of type 1 diabetes in autoantibody-positive populations.