Cargando…

Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes

Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Yan, Ang, Marcus, Foo, Selin, Lee, Wing Sum, Ma, Zhen, Venkatraman, Subbu S., Wong, Tina T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507
_version_ 1782208802539438080
author Peng, Yan
Ang, Marcus
Foo, Selin
Lee, Wing Sum
Ma, Zhen
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Wong, Tina T.
author_facet Peng, Yan
Ang, Marcus
Foo, Selin
Lee, Wing Sum
Ma, Zhen
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Wong, Tina T.
author_sort Peng, Yan
collection PubMed
description Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our study, two microfilms (poly [d,l-lactide-co-glycolide] PLGA and poly[d,l-lactide-co-caprolactone] PLC were developed and evaluated for their degradation behavior in vitro and in vivo. We also evaluated the biocompatibility of both microfilms. Eighteen eyes (9 rabbits) were surgically implanted with one type of microfilm in each eye. Serial anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) scans together with serial slit-lamp microscopy allowed us to measure thickness and cross-sectional area of the microfilms. In vitro studies revealed bulk degradation kinetics for both microfilms, while in vivo studies demonstrated surface erosion kinetics. Serial slit-lamp microscopy revealed no significant inflammation or vascularization in both types of implants (mean increase in vascularity grade PLGA50/50 12±0.5% vs. PLC70/30 15±0.6%; P = 0.91) over a period of 6 months. Histology, immunohistochemistry and immuno-fluorescence also revealed no significant inflammatory reaction from either of the microfilms, which confirmed that both microfilms are biocompatible. The duration of the drug delivery can be tailored by selecting the materials, which have different degradation kinetics, to suit the desired clinical therapeutic application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3142149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31421492011-07-28 Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes Peng, Yan Ang, Marcus Foo, Selin Lee, Wing Sum Ma, Zhen Venkatraman, Subbu S. Wong, Tina T. PLoS One Research Article Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our study, two microfilms (poly [d,l-lactide-co-glycolide] PLGA and poly[d,l-lactide-co-caprolactone] PLC were developed and evaluated for their degradation behavior in vitro and in vivo. We also evaluated the biocompatibility of both microfilms. Eighteen eyes (9 rabbits) were surgically implanted with one type of microfilm in each eye. Serial anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) scans together with serial slit-lamp microscopy allowed us to measure thickness and cross-sectional area of the microfilms. In vitro studies revealed bulk degradation kinetics for both microfilms, while in vivo studies demonstrated surface erosion kinetics. Serial slit-lamp microscopy revealed no significant inflammation or vascularization in both types of implants (mean increase in vascularity grade PLGA50/50 12±0.5% vs. PLC70/30 15±0.6%; P = 0.91) over a period of 6 months. Histology, immunohistochemistry and immuno-fluorescence also revealed no significant inflammatory reaction from either of the microfilms, which confirmed that both microfilms are biocompatible. The duration of the drug delivery can be tailored by selecting the materials, which have different degradation kinetics, to suit the desired clinical therapeutic application. Public Library of Science 2011-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3142149/ /pubmed/21799878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507 Text en Peng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Peng, Yan
Ang, Marcus
Foo, Selin
Lee, Wing Sum
Ma, Zhen
Venkatraman, Subbu S.
Wong, Tina T.
Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title_full Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title_fullStr Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title_short Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
title_sort biocompatibility and biodegradation studies of subconjunctival implants in rabbit eyes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyan biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT angmarcus biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT fooselin biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT leewingsum biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT mazhen biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT venkatramansubbus biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes
AT wongtinat biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes