Cargando…
Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes
Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507 |
_version_ | 1782208802539438080 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Yan Ang, Marcus Foo, Selin Lee, Wing Sum Ma, Zhen Venkatraman, Subbu S. Wong, Tina T. |
author_facet | Peng, Yan Ang, Marcus Foo, Selin Lee, Wing Sum Ma, Zhen Venkatraman, Subbu S. Wong, Tina T. |
author_sort | Peng, Yan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our study, two microfilms (poly [d,l-lactide-co-glycolide] PLGA and poly[d,l-lactide-co-caprolactone] PLC were developed and evaluated for their degradation behavior in vitro and in vivo. We also evaluated the biocompatibility of both microfilms. Eighteen eyes (9 rabbits) were surgically implanted with one type of microfilm in each eye. Serial anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) scans together with serial slit-lamp microscopy allowed us to measure thickness and cross-sectional area of the microfilms. In vitro studies revealed bulk degradation kinetics for both microfilms, while in vivo studies demonstrated surface erosion kinetics. Serial slit-lamp microscopy revealed no significant inflammation or vascularization in both types of implants (mean increase in vascularity grade PLGA50/50 12±0.5% vs. PLC70/30 15±0.6%; P = 0.91) over a period of 6 months. Histology, immunohistochemistry and immuno-fluorescence also revealed no significant inflammatory reaction from either of the microfilms, which confirmed that both microfilms are biocompatible. The duration of the drug delivery can be tailored by selecting the materials, which have different degradation kinetics, to suit the desired clinical therapeutic application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3142149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31421492011-07-28 Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes Peng, Yan Ang, Marcus Foo, Selin Lee, Wing Sum Ma, Zhen Venkatraman, Subbu S. Wong, Tina T. PLoS One Research Article Sustained ocular drug delivery is difficult to achieve. Most drugs have poor penetration due to the multiple physiological barriers of the eye and are rapidly cleared if applied topically. Biodegradable subconjunctival implants with controlled drug release may circumvent these two problems. In our study, two microfilms (poly [d,l-lactide-co-glycolide] PLGA and poly[d,l-lactide-co-caprolactone] PLC were developed and evaluated for their degradation behavior in vitro and in vivo. We also evaluated the biocompatibility of both microfilms. Eighteen eyes (9 rabbits) were surgically implanted with one type of microfilm in each eye. Serial anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) scans together with serial slit-lamp microscopy allowed us to measure thickness and cross-sectional area of the microfilms. In vitro studies revealed bulk degradation kinetics for both microfilms, while in vivo studies demonstrated surface erosion kinetics. Serial slit-lamp microscopy revealed no significant inflammation or vascularization in both types of implants (mean increase in vascularity grade PLGA50/50 12±0.5% vs. PLC70/30 15±0.6%; P = 0.91) over a period of 6 months. Histology, immunohistochemistry and immuno-fluorescence also revealed no significant inflammatory reaction from either of the microfilms, which confirmed that both microfilms are biocompatible. The duration of the drug delivery can be tailored by selecting the materials, which have different degradation kinetics, to suit the desired clinical therapeutic application. Public Library of Science 2011-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3142149/ /pubmed/21799878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507 Text en Peng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Peng, Yan Ang, Marcus Foo, Selin Lee, Wing Sum Ma, Zhen Venkatraman, Subbu S. Wong, Tina T. Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title | Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title_full | Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title_fullStr | Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title_short | Biocompatibility and Biodegradation Studies of Subconjunctival Implants in Rabbit Eyes |
title_sort | biocompatibility and biodegradation studies of subconjunctival implants in rabbit eyes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengyan biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT angmarcus biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT fooselin biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT leewingsum biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT mazhen biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT venkatramansubbus biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes AT wongtinat biocompatibilityandbiodegradationstudiesofsubconjunctivalimplantsinrabbiteyes |