Cargando…

On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence

During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roeber, Urte, Veser, Sandra, Schröger, Erich, O'Shea, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612
_version_ 1782208810261151744
author Roeber, Urte
Veser, Sandra
Schröger, Erich
O'Shea, Robert P.
author_facet Roeber, Urte
Veser, Sandra
Schröger, Erich
O'Shea, Robert P.
author_sort Roeber, Urte
collection PubMed
description During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160–210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210–300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3142186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31421862011-07-28 On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence Roeber, Urte Veser, Sandra Schröger, Erich O'Shea, Robert P. PLoS One Research Article During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160–210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210–300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry. Public Library of Science 2011-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3142186/ /pubmed/21799918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612 Text en Roeber et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roeber, Urte
Veser, Sandra
Schröger, Erich
O'Shea, Robert P.
On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title_full On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title_fullStr On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title_full_unstemmed On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title_short On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
title_sort on the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612
work_keys_str_mv AT roeberurte ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT vesersandra ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT schrogererich ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence
AT oshearobertp ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence