Cargando…
On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence
During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612 |
_version_ | 1782208810261151744 |
---|---|
author | Roeber, Urte Veser, Sandra Schröger, Erich O'Shea, Robert P. |
author_facet | Roeber, Urte Veser, Sandra Schröger, Erich O'Shea, Robert P. |
author_sort | Roeber, Urte |
collection | PubMed |
description | During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160–210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210–300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3142186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31421862011-07-28 On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence Roeber, Urte Veser, Sandra Schröger, Erich O'Shea, Robert P. PLoS One Research Article During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160–210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210–300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry. Public Library of Science 2011-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3142186/ /pubmed/21799918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612 Text en Roeber et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Roeber, Urte Veser, Sandra Schröger, Erich O'Shea, Robert P. On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title | On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title_full | On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title_fullStr | On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title_short | On the Role of Attention in Binocular Rivalry: Electrophysiological Evidence |
title_sort | on the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roeberurte ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence AT vesersandra ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence AT schrogererich ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence AT oshearobertp ontheroleofattentioninbinocularrivalryelectrophysiologicalevidence |