Cargando…

The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks

BACKGROUND: Single-port access (SPA) surgery is a novel surgical technique to create nearly “scarless” surgery. SPA surgery appears to be safe and feasible, but the exposure and handling of tissue may not be optimal. Therefore, the performance of SPA surgery with different instruments used and conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botden, Sanne, Strijkers, Rob, Fransen, Sofie, Stassen, Laurents, Bouvy, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1633-1
_version_ 1782208826392444928
author Botden, Sanne
Strijkers, Rob
Fransen, Sofie
Stassen, Laurents
Bouvy, Nicole
author_facet Botden, Sanne
Strijkers, Rob
Fransen, Sofie
Stassen, Laurents
Bouvy, Nicole
author_sort Botden, Sanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-port access (SPA) surgery is a novel surgical technique to create nearly “scarless” surgery. SPA surgery appears to be safe and feasible, but the exposure and handling of tissue may not be optimal. Therefore, the performance of SPA surgery with different instruments used and conventional laparoscopy is compared. METHODS: Fifteen participants (>50 laparoscopic procedures) performed three basic tasks (translocation, clip & cut, and tissue dissection, based on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery) in the box trainer in laparoscopy and SPA settings with both (conventional) crossed and curved instruments. All participants completed a questionnaire, which asked their opinion on the use of instruments and preference. RESULTS: Translocation was performed significantly faster in both laparoscopy and SPA crossed than SPA curved (means, 130.3 and 137.7 vs. 170.7 sec; p < 0.001 and p = 0.005). The errors also were less in laparoscopy and SPA crossed (means, 0.9 and 1.2 vs. 1.6), but not significant. The time to complete the dissection was almost equal between laparoscopy and SPA curved settings, but took longer for SPA crossed, although not significantly (148.1 and 150.8 vs. 179.5 sec). The errors only differed significantly between laparoscopy and SPA crossed (means, 0.5 vs. 1.27; p = 0.044). Fourteen participants still favored conventional laparoscopy and one SPA curved. They also thought SPA curved was better than crossed (means, 3.6 vs. 2.47; p = 0.003) and that exposure is superior in curved (means, 3.4 vs. 2.27; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional laparoscopy may appear most effective for proper dissection and exposure of tissue, single-port access surgery shows potential. Especially in the tissue dissection task, there is no significant difference in time or errors between conventional laparoscopy and SPA surgery, using specially designed curved instruments. Although the participants favor conventional laparoscopy, this could evolve to a more accepting mind when SPA surgery becomes more available and used in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3142334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31423342011-09-08 The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks Botden, Sanne Strijkers, Rob Fransen, Sofie Stassen, Laurents Bouvy, Nicole Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Single-port access (SPA) surgery is a novel surgical technique to create nearly “scarless” surgery. SPA surgery appears to be safe and feasible, but the exposure and handling of tissue may not be optimal. Therefore, the performance of SPA surgery with different instruments used and conventional laparoscopy is compared. METHODS: Fifteen participants (>50 laparoscopic procedures) performed three basic tasks (translocation, clip & cut, and tissue dissection, based on the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery) in the box trainer in laparoscopy and SPA settings with both (conventional) crossed and curved instruments. All participants completed a questionnaire, which asked their opinion on the use of instruments and preference. RESULTS: Translocation was performed significantly faster in both laparoscopy and SPA crossed than SPA curved (means, 130.3 and 137.7 vs. 170.7 sec; p < 0.001 and p = 0.005). The errors also were less in laparoscopy and SPA crossed (means, 0.9 and 1.2 vs. 1.6), but not significant. The time to complete the dissection was almost equal between laparoscopy and SPA curved settings, but took longer for SPA crossed, although not significantly (148.1 and 150.8 vs. 179.5 sec). The errors only differed significantly between laparoscopy and SPA crossed (means, 0.5 vs. 1.27; p = 0.044). Fourteen participants still favored conventional laparoscopy and one SPA curved. They also thought SPA curved was better than crossed (means, 3.6 vs. 2.47; p = 0.003) and that exposure is superior in curved (means, 3.4 vs. 2.27; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although conventional laparoscopy may appear most effective for proper dissection and exposure of tissue, single-port access surgery shows potential. Especially in the tissue dissection task, there is no significant difference in time or errors between conventional laparoscopy and SPA surgery, using specially designed curved instruments. Although the participants favor conventional laparoscopy, this could evolve to a more accepting mind when SPA surgery becomes more available and used in the clinical setting. Springer-Verlag 2011-03-25 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3142334/ /pubmed/21437738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1633-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Botden, Sanne
Strijkers, Rob
Fransen, Sofie
Stassen, Laurents
Bouvy, Nicole
The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title_full The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title_fullStr The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title_full_unstemmed The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title_short The use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
title_sort use of curved vs. straight instruments in single port access surgery, on standardized box trainer tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1633-1
work_keys_str_mv AT botdensanne theuseofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT strijkersrob theuseofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT fransensofie theuseofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT stassenlaurents theuseofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT bouvynicole theuseofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT botdensanne useofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT strijkersrob useofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT fransensofie useofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT stassenlaurents useofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks
AT bouvynicole useofcurvedvsstraightinstrumentsinsingleportaccesssurgeryonstandardizedboxtrainertasks