Cargando…
Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal
Kidney volume is regarded as the most precise indicator of kidney size. However, volume assessment is not widely used clinically because its measurement is difficult due to the complex kidney shape. Apart from the conventional methods of measurement of renal dimensions from X-rays, ultrasound scan,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.82832 |
_version_ | 1782208862817878016 |
---|---|
author | Moorthy, H. Krishna Venugopal, P. |
author_facet | Moorthy, H. Krishna Venugopal, P. |
author_sort | Moorthy, H. Krishna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Kidney volume is regarded as the most precise indicator of kidney size. However, volume assessment is not widely used clinically because its measurement is difficult due to the complex kidney shape. Apart from the conventional methods of measurement of renal dimensions from X-rays, ultrasound scan, computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging have evolved as the three best modalities for this purpose currently. Assessment of kidney size should also be made individually since many factors like body mass index, height, gender, age, position of kidneys, sex, stenoses and number of renal arteries influence the measurements. In this paper, we have critically analysed the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods of renal morphometry, by reviewing the literature spanning over the period of 1976 – 2009. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3142824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31428242011-08-03 Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal Moorthy, H. Krishna Venugopal, P. Indian J Urol Mini Review Kidney volume is regarded as the most precise indicator of kidney size. However, volume assessment is not widely used clinically because its measurement is difficult due to the complex kidney shape. Apart from the conventional methods of measurement of renal dimensions from X-rays, ultrasound scan, computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging have evolved as the three best modalities for this purpose currently. Assessment of kidney size should also be made individually since many factors like body mass index, height, gender, age, position of kidneys, sex, stenoses and number of renal arteries influence the measurements. In this paper, we have critically analysed the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods of renal morphometry, by reviewing the literature spanning over the period of 1976 – 2009. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3142824/ /pubmed/21814304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.82832 Text en © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Mini Review Moorthy, H. Krishna Venugopal, P. Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title | Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title_full | Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title_fullStr | Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title_short | Measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: A critical appraisal |
title_sort | measurement of renal dimensions in vivo: a critical appraisal |
topic | Mini Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3142824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.82832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorthyhkrishna measurementofrenaldimensionsinvivoacriticalappraisal AT venugopalp measurementofrenaldimensionsinvivoacriticalappraisal |