Cargando…
The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal
All the opinions in this article are those of the authors and should not be construed to reflect, in any way, those of the Department of Veterans Affairs. BACKGROUND: Our study purpose was to assess the predictive validity of reviewer quality ratings and editorial decisions in a general medicine jou...
Autores principales: | Jackson, Jeffrey L., Srinivasan, Malathi, Rea, Joanna, Fletcher, Kathlyn E., Kravitz, Richard L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3143147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21799867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022475 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care?
por: Kravitz, Richard L., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Peer Review – Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2016) -
Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals: The world association of medical editors position on a challenging problem
por: Ferris, L. E., et al.
Publicado: (2010)