Cargando…

True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures

Neural bases of human olfactory memory are poorly understood. Very few studies have examined neural substrates associated with correct odor recognition, and none has tackled neural networks associated with incorrect odor recognition. We investigated the neural basis of task performance during a yes–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royet, Jean-Pierre, Morin-Audebrand, Léri, Cerf-Ducastel, Barbara, Haase, Lori, Issanchou, Sylvie, Murphy, Claire, Fonlupt, Pierre, Sulmont-Rossé, Claire, Plailly, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3143719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00065
_version_ 1782208926135091200
author Royet, Jean-Pierre
Morin-Audebrand, Léri
Cerf-Ducastel, Barbara
Haase, Lori
Issanchou, Sylvie
Murphy, Claire
Fonlupt, Pierre
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
Plailly, Jane
author_facet Royet, Jean-Pierre
Morin-Audebrand, Léri
Cerf-Ducastel, Barbara
Haase, Lori
Issanchou, Sylvie
Murphy, Claire
Fonlupt, Pierre
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
Plailly, Jane
author_sort Royet, Jean-Pierre
collection PubMed
description Neural bases of human olfactory memory are poorly understood. Very few studies have examined neural substrates associated with correct odor recognition, and none has tackled neural networks associated with incorrect odor recognition. We investigated the neural basis of task performance during a yes–no odor recognition memory paradigm in young and elderly subjects using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. We explored four response categories: correct (Hit) and incorrect false alarm (FA) recognition, as well as correct (CR) and incorrect (Miss) rejection, and we characterized corresponding brain responses using multivariate analysis and linear regression analysis. We hypothesized that areas of the medial temporal lobe were differentially involved depending on the accuracy of odor recognition. In young adults, we found that significant activity in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus was associated with correct (true) recognition of odors, whereas the perirhinal cortex was associated with FAs and Misses. These findings are consistent with literature regarding hypothetical functional organization for memory processing. We also found that for correct recognition and rejection responses, the involvement of the hippocampus decreased when memory performances improved. In contrast to young individuals, elderly subjects were more prone to false memories and exhibited less specific activation patterns for the four response categories. Activation in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus was positively correlated with response bias scores for true and false recognition, demonstrating that conservative subjects produced an additional search effort leading to more activation of these two medial temporal lobe regions. These findings demonstrate that correct and incorrect recognition and rejection induce distinct neural signatures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3143719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31437192011-08-02 True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures Royet, Jean-Pierre Morin-Audebrand, Léri Cerf-Ducastel, Barbara Haase, Lori Issanchou, Sylvie Murphy, Claire Fonlupt, Pierre Sulmont-Rossé, Claire Plailly, Jane Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Neural bases of human olfactory memory are poorly understood. Very few studies have examined neural substrates associated with correct odor recognition, and none has tackled neural networks associated with incorrect odor recognition. We investigated the neural basis of task performance during a yes–no odor recognition memory paradigm in young and elderly subjects using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. We explored four response categories: correct (Hit) and incorrect false alarm (FA) recognition, as well as correct (CR) and incorrect (Miss) rejection, and we characterized corresponding brain responses using multivariate analysis and linear regression analysis. We hypothesized that areas of the medial temporal lobe were differentially involved depending on the accuracy of odor recognition. In young adults, we found that significant activity in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus was associated with correct (true) recognition of odors, whereas the perirhinal cortex was associated with FAs and Misses. These findings are consistent with literature regarding hypothetical functional organization for memory processing. We also found that for correct recognition and rejection responses, the involvement of the hippocampus decreased when memory performances improved. In contrast to young individuals, elderly subjects were more prone to false memories and exhibited less specific activation patterns for the four response categories. Activation in the hippocampus and the parahippocampal gyrus was positively correlated with response bias scores for true and false recognition, demonstrating that conservative subjects produced an additional search effort leading to more activation of these two medial temporal lobe regions. These findings demonstrate that correct and incorrect recognition and rejection induce distinct neural signatures. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3143719/ /pubmed/21811450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00065 Text en Copyright © 2011 Royet, Morin-Audebrand, Cerf-Ducastel, Haase, Issanchou, Murphy, Fonlupt, Sulmont-Rossé and Plailly. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Royet, Jean-Pierre
Morin-Audebrand, Léri
Cerf-Ducastel, Barbara
Haase, Lori
Issanchou, Sylvie
Murphy, Claire
Fonlupt, Pierre
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
Plailly, Jane
True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title_full True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title_fullStr True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title_full_unstemmed True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title_short True and False Recognition Memories of Odors Induce Distinct Neural Signatures
title_sort true and false recognition memories of odors induce distinct neural signatures
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3143719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21811450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00065
work_keys_str_mv AT royetjeanpierre trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT morinaudebrandleri trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT cerfducastelbarbara trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT haaselori trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT issanchousylvie trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT murphyclaire trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT fonluptpierre trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT sulmontrosseclaire trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures
AT plaillyjane trueandfalserecognitionmemoriesofodorsinducedistinctneuralsignatures