Cargando…

Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the Netherlands. The majority of chlamydia diagnoses are made by general practitioners (GPs). Baseline data from primary care will facilitate the future evaluation of the ongoing large population-based screening...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM, van den Broek, Ingrid VF, Brouwer, Henk J, Vanrolleghem, Ann M, Joosten, Johanna HK, Verheij, Robert A, van der Sande, Marianne AB, Kretzschmar, Mirjam EE
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3143931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-72
_version_ 1782208951020945408
author Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM
van den Broek, Ingrid VF
Brouwer, Henk J
Vanrolleghem, Ann M
Joosten, Johanna HK
Verheij, Robert A
van der Sande, Marianne AB
Kretzschmar, Mirjam EE
author_facet Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM
van den Broek, Ingrid VF
Brouwer, Henk J
Vanrolleghem, Ann M
Joosten, Johanna HK
Verheij, Robert A
van der Sande, Marianne AB
Kretzschmar, Mirjam EE
author_sort Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the Netherlands. The majority of chlamydia diagnoses are made by general practitioners (GPs). Baseline data from primary care will facilitate the future evaluation of the ongoing large population-based screening in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of electronic medical records for monitoring the incidence of chlamydia cases diagnosed in primary care in the Netherlands. METHODS: In the electronic records of two regional and two national networks, we identified chlamydia diagnoses by means of ICPC codes (International Classification of Primary Care), laboratory results in free text and the prescription of antibiotics. The year of study was 2007 for the two regional networks and one national network, for the other national network the year of study was 2005. We calculated the incidence of diagnosed chlamydia cases per sex, age group and degree of urbanization. RESULTS: A large diversity was observed in the way chlamydia episodes were coded in the four different GP networks and how easily information concerning chlamydia diagnoses could be extracted. The overall incidence ranged from 103.2/100,000 to 590.2/100,000. Differences were partly related to differences between patient populations. Nevertheless, we observed similar trends in the incidence of chlamydia diagnoses in all networks and findings were in line with earlier reports. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic patient records, originally intended for individual patient care in general practice, can be an additional source of data for monitoring chlamydia incidence in primary care and can be of use in assessing the future impact of population-based chlamydia screening programs. To increase the usefulness of data we recommend more efforts to standardize registration by (specific) ICPC code and laboratory results across the existing GP networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3143931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31439312011-07-27 Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM van den Broek, Ingrid VF Brouwer, Henk J Vanrolleghem, Ann M Joosten, Johanna HK Verheij, Robert A van der Sande, Marianne AB Kretzschmar, Mirjam EE BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydia is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the Netherlands. The majority of chlamydia diagnoses are made by general practitioners (GPs). Baseline data from primary care will facilitate the future evaluation of the ongoing large population-based screening in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of electronic medical records for monitoring the incidence of chlamydia cases diagnosed in primary care in the Netherlands. METHODS: In the electronic records of two regional and two national networks, we identified chlamydia diagnoses by means of ICPC codes (International Classification of Primary Care), laboratory results in free text and the prescription of antibiotics. The year of study was 2007 for the two regional networks and one national network, for the other national network the year of study was 2005. We calculated the incidence of diagnosed chlamydia cases per sex, age group and degree of urbanization. RESULTS: A large diversity was observed in the way chlamydia episodes were coded in the four different GP networks and how easily information concerning chlamydia diagnoses could be extracted. The overall incidence ranged from 103.2/100,000 to 590.2/100,000. Differences were partly related to differences between patient populations. Nevertheless, we observed similar trends in the incidence of chlamydia diagnoses in all networks and findings were in line with earlier reports. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic patient records, originally intended for individual patient care in general practice, can be an additional source of data for monitoring chlamydia incidence in primary care and can be of use in assessing the future impact of population-based chlamydia screening programs. To increase the usefulness of data we recommend more efforts to standardize registration by (specific) ICPC code and laboratory results across the existing GP networks. BioMed Central 2011-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3143931/ /pubmed/21740536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-72 Text en Copyright ©2011 Suijkerbuijk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Suijkerbuijk, Anita WM
van den Broek, Ingrid VF
Brouwer, Henk J
Vanrolleghem, Ann M
Joosten, Johanna HK
Verheij, Robert A
van der Sande, Marianne AB
Kretzschmar, Mirjam EE
Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title_full Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title_fullStr Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title_short Usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
title_sort usefulness of primary care electronic networks to assess the incidence of chlamydia, diagnosed by general practitioners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3143931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-12-72
work_keys_str_mv AT suijkerbuijkanitawm usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT vandenbroekingridvf usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT brouwerhenkj usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT vanrolleghemannm usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT joostenjohannahk usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT verheijroberta usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT vandersandemarianneab usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners
AT kretzschmarmirjamee usefulnessofprimarycareelectronicnetworkstoassesstheincidenceofchlamydiadiagnosedbygeneralpractitioners