Cargando…

Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab

Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Helen L., Dewey, Caroline A., Ely, Morgan S., Willoughby, Sarah L., Parsons, Tanya M., Cox, Victoria, Spencer, Phillippa M., Weller, Simon A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3144239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668
_version_ 1782208984352030720
author Rose, Helen L.
Dewey, Caroline A.
Ely, Morgan S.
Willoughby, Sarah L.
Parsons, Tanya M.
Cox, Victoria
Spencer, Phillippa M.
Weller, Simon A.
author_facet Rose, Helen L.
Dewey, Caroline A.
Ely, Morgan S.
Willoughby, Sarah L.
Parsons, Tanya M.
Cox, Victoria
Spencer, Phillippa M.
Weller, Simon A.
author_sort Rose, Helen L.
collection PubMed
description Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit; Sigma Extract-N-Amp Plant and Seed Kit) were adapted to facilitate extraction of DNA under BSL3 containment conditions. DNA was extracted from 12 common interferents or sample types, spiked with spores of Bacillus atropheaus. Resulting extracts were tested by real-time PCR. No one method was the best, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types. Statistical analysis indicated that the PrepFiler method was the best method from six dry powders (baking, biological washing, milk, plain flour, filler and talcum) and one solid (Underarm deodorant), the UltraClean method was the best from four liquids (aftershave, cola, nutrient broth, vinegar), and the MasterPure method was the best from the swab sample type. The best overall method, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types evaluated was the UltraClean method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3144239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31442392011-08-04 Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab Rose, Helen L. Dewey, Caroline A. Ely, Morgan S. Willoughby, Sarah L. Parsons, Tanya M. Cox, Victoria Spencer, Phillippa M. Weller, Simon A. PLoS One Research Article Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit; Sigma Extract-N-Amp Plant and Seed Kit) were adapted to facilitate extraction of DNA under BSL3 containment conditions. DNA was extracted from 12 common interferents or sample types, spiked with spores of Bacillus atropheaus. Resulting extracts were tested by real-time PCR. No one method was the best, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types. Statistical analysis indicated that the PrepFiler method was the best method from six dry powders (baking, biological washing, milk, plain flour, filler and talcum) and one solid (Underarm deodorant), the UltraClean method was the best from four liquids (aftershave, cola, nutrient broth, vinegar), and the MasterPure method was the best from the swab sample type. The best overall method, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types evaluated was the UltraClean method. Public Library of Science 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3144239/ /pubmed/21818364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668 Text en Rose et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rose, Helen L.
Dewey, Caroline A.
Ely, Morgan S.
Willoughby, Sarah L.
Parsons, Tanya M.
Cox, Victoria
Spencer, Phillippa M.
Weller, Simon A.
Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title_full Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title_fullStr Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title_short Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
title_sort comparison of eight methods for the extraction of bacillus atrophaeus spore dna from eleven common interferents and a common swab
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3144239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668
work_keys_str_mv AT rosehelenl comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT deweycarolinea comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT elymorgans comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT willoughbysarahl comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT parsonstanyam comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT coxvictoria comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT spencerphillippam comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab
AT wellersimona comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab