Cargando…
Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab
Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Micro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3144239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668 |
_version_ | 1782208984352030720 |
---|---|
author | Rose, Helen L. Dewey, Caroline A. Ely, Morgan S. Willoughby, Sarah L. Parsons, Tanya M. Cox, Victoria Spencer, Phillippa M. Weller, Simon A. |
author_facet | Rose, Helen L. Dewey, Caroline A. Ely, Morgan S. Willoughby, Sarah L. Parsons, Tanya M. Cox, Victoria Spencer, Phillippa M. Weller, Simon A. |
author_sort | Rose, Helen L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit; Sigma Extract-N-Amp Plant and Seed Kit) were adapted to facilitate extraction of DNA under BSL3 containment conditions. DNA was extracted from 12 common interferents or sample types, spiked with spores of Bacillus atropheaus. Resulting extracts were tested by real-time PCR. No one method was the best, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types. Statistical analysis indicated that the PrepFiler method was the best method from six dry powders (baking, biological washing, milk, plain flour, filler and talcum) and one solid (Underarm deodorant), the UltraClean method was the best from four liquids (aftershave, cola, nutrient broth, vinegar), and the MasterPure method was the best from the swab sample type. The best overall method, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types evaluated was the UltraClean method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3144239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31442392011-08-04 Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab Rose, Helen L. Dewey, Caroline A. Ely, Morgan S. Willoughby, Sarah L. Parsons, Tanya M. Cox, Victoria Spencer, Phillippa M. Weller, Simon A. PLoS One Research Article Eight DNA extraction products or methods (Applied Biosystems PrepFiler Forensic DNA Extraction Kit; Bio-Rad Instagene Only, Bio-Rad Instagene & Spin Column Purification; EpiCentre MasterPure DNA & RNA Kit; FujiFilm QuickGene Mini80; Idaho Technologies 1-2-3 Q-Flow Kit; MoBio UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit; Sigma Extract-N-Amp Plant and Seed Kit) were adapted to facilitate extraction of DNA under BSL3 containment conditions. DNA was extracted from 12 common interferents or sample types, spiked with spores of Bacillus atropheaus. Resulting extracts were tested by real-time PCR. No one method was the best, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types. Statistical analysis indicated that the PrepFiler method was the best method from six dry powders (baking, biological washing, milk, plain flour, filler and talcum) and one solid (Underarm deodorant), the UltraClean method was the best from four liquids (aftershave, cola, nutrient broth, vinegar), and the MasterPure method was the best from the swab sample type. The best overall method, in terms of DNA extraction, across all sample types evaluated was the UltraClean method. Public Library of Science 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3144239/ /pubmed/21818364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668 Text en Rose et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rose, Helen L. Dewey, Caroline A. Ely, Morgan S. Willoughby, Sarah L. Parsons, Tanya M. Cox, Victoria Spencer, Phillippa M. Weller, Simon A. Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title | Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title_full | Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title_short | Comparison of Eight Methods for the Extraction of Bacillus atrophaeus Spore DNA from Eleven Common Interferents and a Common Swab |
title_sort | comparison of eight methods for the extraction of bacillus atrophaeus spore dna from eleven common interferents and a common swab |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3144239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21818364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosehelenl comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT deweycarolinea comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT elymorgans comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT willoughbysarahl comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT parsonstanyam comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT coxvictoria comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT spencerphillippam comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab AT wellersimona comparisonofeightmethodsfortheextractionofbacillusatrophaeussporednafromelevencommoninterferentsandacommonswab |