Cargando…

Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds

If it is well known that knowledge facilitates higher cognitive functions, such as visual and auditory word recognition, little is known about the influence of knowledge on detection, particularly in the auditory modality. Our study tested the influence of phonological and lexical knowledge on audit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Signoret, Carine, Gaudrain, Etienne, Tillmann, Barbara, Grimault, Nicolas, Perrin, Fabien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00176
_version_ 1782209076928708608
author Signoret, Carine
Gaudrain, Etienne
Tillmann, Barbara
Grimault, Nicolas
Perrin, Fabien
author_facet Signoret, Carine
Gaudrain, Etienne
Tillmann, Barbara
Grimault, Nicolas
Perrin, Fabien
author_sort Signoret, Carine
collection PubMed
description If it is well known that knowledge facilitates higher cognitive functions, such as visual and auditory word recognition, little is known about the influence of knowledge on detection, particularly in the auditory modality. Our study tested the influence of phonological and lexical knowledge on auditory detection. Words, pseudo-words, and complex non-phonological sounds, energetically matched as closely as possible, were presented at a range of presentation levels from sub-threshold to clearly audible. The participants performed a detection task (Experiments 1 and 2) that was followed by a two alternative forced-choice recognition task in Experiment 2. The results of this second task in Experiment 2 suggest a correct recognition of words in the absence of detection with a subjective threshold approach. In the detection task of both experiments, phonological stimuli (words and pseudo-words) were better detected than non-phonological stimuli (complex sounds), presented close to the auditory threshold. This finding suggests an advantage of speech for signal detection. An additional advantage of words over pseudo-words was observed in Experiment 2, suggesting that lexical knowledge could also improve auditory detection when listeners had to recognize the stimulus in a subsequent task. Two simulations of detection performance performed on the sound signals confirmed that the advantage of speech over non-speech processing could not be attributed to energetic differences in the stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3145255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31452552011-08-15 Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds Signoret, Carine Gaudrain, Etienne Tillmann, Barbara Grimault, Nicolas Perrin, Fabien Front Psychol Psychology If it is well known that knowledge facilitates higher cognitive functions, such as visual and auditory word recognition, little is known about the influence of knowledge on detection, particularly in the auditory modality. Our study tested the influence of phonological and lexical knowledge on auditory detection. Words, pseudo-words, and complex non-phonological sounds, energetically matched as closely as possible, were presented at a range of presentation levels from sub-threshold to clearly audible. The participants performed a detection task (Experiments 1 and 2) that was followed by a two alternative forced-choice recognition task in Experiment 2. The results of this second task in Experiment 2 suggest a correct recognition of words in the absence of detection with a subjective threshold approach. In the detection task of both experiments, phonological stimuli (words and pseudo-words) were better detected than non-phonological stimuli (complex sounds), presented close to the auditory threshold. This finding suggests an advantage of speech for signal detection. An additional advantage of words over pseudo-words was observed in Experiment 2, suggesting that lexical knowledge could also improve auditory detection when listeners had to recognize the stimulus in a subsequent task. Two simulations of detection performance performed on the sound signals confirmed that the advantage of speech over non-speech processing could not be attributed to energetic differences in the stimuli. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3145255/ /pubmed/21845183 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00176 Text en Copyright © 2011 Signoret, Gaudrain, Tillmann, Grimault and Perrin. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Signoret, Carine
Gaudrain, Etienne
Tillmann, Barbara
Grimault, Nicolas
Perrin, Fabien
Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title_full Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title_fullStr Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title_full_unstemmed Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title_short Facilitated Auditory Detection for Speech Sounds
title_sort facilitated auditory detection for speech sounds
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845183
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00176
work_keys_str_mv AT signoretcarine facilitatedauditorydetectionforspeechsounds
AT gaudrainetienne facilitatedauditorydetectionforspeechsounds
AT tillmannbarbara facilitatedauditorydetectionforspeechsounds
AT grimaultnicolas facilitatedauditorydetectionforspeechsounds
AT perrinfabien facilitatedauditorydetectionforspeechsounds