Cargando…

Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report

Subperiosteal implants used to be prescribed to partially and fully edentulous patients to restore occlusion and esthetics prior to the emergence of the more successful endosseous implants that are used today. Because subperiosteal implants had a high incidence of failure, difficulty of placement, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrero, Carlos, Border, Michael B., Bencharit, Sompop
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804901
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010122
_version_ 1782209078075850752
author Barrero, Carlos
Border, Michael B.
Bencharit, Sompop
author_facet Barrero, Carlos
Border, Michael B.
Bencharit, Sompop
author_sort Barrero, Carlos
collection PubMed
description Subperiosteal implants used to be prescribed to partially and fully edentulous patients to restore occlusion and esthetics prior to the emergence of the more successful endosseous implants that are used today. Because subperiosteal implants had a high incidence of failure, difficulty of placement, and post-operative complications, the use of subperiosteal implants declined significantly. However, some subperiostal implants placed 20-30 years ago still survive. Little information is available in the literature on how to treat patients whose subperiosteal implants still remain. This clinical case report thereby describes a treatment for a patient with a maxillary subperiosteal implant placed 23 years ago. The patient was offered a treatment option that included surgical implant removal, bone grafting and placement of endosseous implants to support a new maxillary overdenture. This treatment plan was not feasible due to the financial constraints of the patient and the complexity of the treatment. The patient chose a more conservative treatment plan, preserving the existing implant. The existing maxillary subperiosteal implant was restored with MICRO ERA attachments and a maxillary implant-retained overdenture was fabricated. The patient was satisfied with the esthetics and functional aspects of the treatment. No further peri-implant bone loss or other complications were found after a six-month recall. This clinical report suggests an alternative treatment plan for patients with existing subperiosteal implants that wish to avoid complex surgical procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3145260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31452602011-07-29 Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report Barrero, Carlos Border, Michael B. Bencharit, Sompop Open Dent J Article Subperiosteal implants used to be prescribed to partially and fully edentulous patients to restore occlusion and esthetics prior to the emergence of the more successful endosseous implants that are used today. Because subperiosteal implants had a high incidence of failure, difficulty of placement, and post-operative complications, the use of subperiosteal implants declined significantly. However, some subperiostal implants placed 20-30 years ago still survive. Little information is available in the literature on how to treat patients whose subperiosteal implants still remain. This clinical case report thereby describes a treatment for a patient with a maxillary subperiosteal implant placed 23 years ago. The patient was offered a treatment option that included surgical implant removal, bone grafting and placement of endosseous implants to support a new maxillary overdenture. This treatment plan was not feasible due to the financial constraints of the patient and the complexity of the treatment. The patient chose a more conservative treatment plan, preserving the existing implant. The existing maxillary subperiosteal implant was restored with MICRO ERA attachments and a maxillary implant-retained overdenture was fabricated. The patient was satisfied with the esthetics and functional aspects of the treatment. No further peri-implant bone loss or other complications were found after a six-month recall. This clinical report suggests an alternative treatment plan for patients with existing subperiosteal implants that wish to avoid complex surgical procedures. Bentham Open 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3145260/ /pubmed/21804901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010122 Text en © Barrero et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Barrero, Carlos
Border, Michael B.
Bencharit, Sompop
Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title_full Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title_fullStr Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title_full_unstemmed Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title_short Fabrication of a Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture Using an Existing Subperiostal Implant: A Clinical Report
title_sort fabrication of a maxillary implant retained overdenture using an existing subperiostal implant: a clinical report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21804901
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601105010122
work_keys_str_mv AT barrerocarlos fabricationofamaxillaryimplantretainedoverdentureusinganexistingsubperiostalimplantaclinicalreport
AT bordermichaelb fabricationofamaxillaryimplantretainedoverdentureusinganexistingsubperiostalimplantaclinicalreport
AT bencharitsompop fabricationofamaxillaryimplantretainedoverdentureusinganexistingsubperiostalimplantaclinicalreport