Cargando…
Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847434 |
_version_ | 1782209088637108224 |
---|---|
author | Griffin, Michelle Bayat, Ardeshir |
author_facet | Griffin, Michelle Bayat, Ardeshir |
author_sort | Griffin, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evidence (LOE) for the application of ES to enhance bone healing and investigate the proposed mechanism for its stimulatory effect. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were conducted to identify clinical and in vitro studies utilizing ES for bone healing since 1959. A total of 105 clinical studies and 35 in vitro studies were evaluated. Clinical studies were assigned LOE according to Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (LOE-1, highest; LOE-5, lowest). Results: Direct current was found to be effective in enhancing bone healing in spinal fusion but only LOE-4 supported its use for nonunions. Eleven studies were retrieved for capacitive coupling with LOE-1 demonstrating its effectiveness for treating nonunions. The majority of studies utilized inductive coupling with LOE-1 supporting its application for healing osteotomies and nonunions. In vitro studies demonstrate that ES enhances bone healing by changes in growth factors and transmembrane signaling although no clear mechanism has been defined. Conclusion: Overall, the studies, although in favor of ES application in bone repair, displayed variability in treatment regime, primary outcome measures, follow-up times, and study design, making critical evaluation and assessment difficult. Electrical stimulation shows promise in enhancement of bone healing; however, better-designed clinical studies will enable the optimization for clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3145421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31454212011-08-16 Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence Griffin, Michelle Bayat, Ardeshir Eplasty Journal Article Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evidence (LOE) for the application of ES to enhance bone healing and investigate the proposed mechanism for its stimulatory effect. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were conducted to identify clinical and in vitro studies utilizing ES for bone healing since 1959. A total of 105 clinical studies and 35 in vitro studies were evaluated. Clinical studies were assigned LOE according to Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (LOE-1, highest; LOE-5, lowest). Results: Direct current was found to be effective in enhancing bone healing in spinal fusion but only LOE-4 supported its use for nonunions. Eleven studies were retrieved for capacitive coupling with LOE-1 demonstrating its effectiveness for treating nonunions. The majority of studies utilized inductive coupling with LOE-1 supporting its application for healing osteotomies and nonunions. In vitro studies demonstrate that ES enhances bone healing by changes in growth factors and transmembrane signaling although no clear mechanism has been defined. Conclusion: Overall, the studies, although in favor of ES application in bone repair, displayed variability in treatment regime, primary outcome measures, follow-up times, and study design, making critical evaluation and assessment difficult. Electrical stimulation shows promise in enhancement of bone healing; however, better-designed clinical studies will enable the optimization for clinical practice. Open Science Company, LLC 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3145421/ /pubmed/21847434 Text en Copyright © 2011 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Griffin, Michelle Bayat, Ardeshir Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title | Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title_full | Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title_fullStr | Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title_short | Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence |
title_sort | electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffinmichelle electricalstimulationinbonehealingcriticalanalysisbyevaluatinglevelsofevidence AT bayatardeshir electricalstimulationinbonehealingcriticalanalysisbyevaluatinglevelsofevidence |