Cargando…

Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence

Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Michelle, Bayat, Ardeshir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847434
_version_ 1782209088637108224
author Griffin, Michelle
Bayat, Ardeshir
author_facet Griffin, Michelle
Bayat, Ardeshir
author_sort Griffin, Michelle
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evidence (LOE) for the application of ES to enhance bone healing and investigate the proposed mechanism for its stimulatory effect. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were conducted to identify clinical and in vitro studies utilizing ES for bone healing since 1959. A total of 105 clinical studies and 35 in vitro studies were evaluated. Clinical studies were assigned LOE according to Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (LOE-1, highest; LOE-5, lowest). Results: Direct current was found to be effective in enhancing bone healing in spinal fusion but only LOE-4 supported its use for nonunions. Eleven studies were retrieved for capacitive coupling with LOE-1 demonstrating its effectiveness for treating nonunions. The majority of studies utilized inductive coupling with LOE-1 supporting its application for healing osteotomies and nonunions. In vitro studies demonstrate that ES enhances bone healing by changes in growth factors and transmembrane signaling although no clear mechanism has been defined. Conclusion: Overall, the studies, although in favor of ES application in bone repair, displayed variability in treatment regime, primary outcome measures, follow-up times, and study design, making critical evaluation and assessment difficult. Electrical stimulation shows promise in enhancement of bone healing; however, better-designed clinical studies will enable the optimization for clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3145421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31454212011-08-16 Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence Griffin, Michelle Bayat, Ardeshir Eplasty Journal Article Objectives: Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evidence (LOE) for the application of ES to enhance bone healing and investigate the proposed mechanism for its stimulatory effect. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were conducted to identify clinical and in vitro studies utilizing ES for bone healing since 1959. A total of 105 clinical studies and 35 in vitro studies were evaluated. Clinical studies were assigned LOE according to Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (LOE-1, highest; LOE-5, lowest). Results: Direct current was found to be effective in enhancing bone healing in spinal fusion but only LOE-4 supported its use for nonunions. Eleven studies were retrieved for capacitive coupling with LOE-1 demonstrating its effectiveness for treating nonunions. The majority of studies utilized inductive coupling with LOE-1 supporting its application for healing osteotomies and nonunions. In vitro studies demonstrate that ES enhances bone healing by changes in growth factors and transmembrane signaling although no clear mechanism has been defined. Conclusion: Overall, the studies, although in favor of ES application in bone repair, displayed variability in treatment regime, primary outcome measures, follow-up times, and study design, making critical evaluation and assessment difficult. Electrical stimulation shows promise in enhancement of bone healing; however, better-designed clinical studies will enable the optimization for clinical practice. Open Science Company, LLC 2011-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3145421/ /pubmed/21847434 Text en Copyright © 2011 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Griffin, Michelle
Bayat, Ardeshir
Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title_full Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title_fullStr Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title_short Electrical Stimulation in Bone Healing: Critical Analysis by Evaluating Levels of Evidence
title_sort electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847434
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinmichelle electricalstimulationinbonehealingcriticalanalysisbyevaluatinglevelsofevidence
AT bayatardeshir electricalstimulationinbonehealingcriticalanalysisbyevaluatinglevelsofevidence