Cargando…

Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration

A statistically principled way of conducting brain network analysis is still lacking. Comparison of different populations of brain networks is hard because topology is inherently dependent on wiring cost, where cost is defined as the number of edges in an unweighted graph. In this paper, we evaluate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginestet, Cedric E., Nichols, Thomas E., Bullmore, Ed T., Simmons, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021570
_version_ 1782209111039934464
author Ginestet, Cedric E.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Bullmore, Ed T.
Simmons, Andrew
author_facet Ginestet, Cedric E.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Bullmore, Ed T.
Simmons, Andrew
author_sort Ginestet, Cedric E.
collection PubMed
description A statistically principled way of conducting brain network analysis is still lacking. Comparison of different populations of brain networks is hard because topology is inherently dependent on wiring cost, where cost is defined as the number of edges in an unweighted graph. In this paper, we evaluate the benefits and limitations associated with using cost-integrated topological metrics. Our focus is on comparing populations of weighted undirected graphs that differ in mean association weight, using global efficiency. Our key result shows that integrating over cost is equivalent to controlling for any monotonic transformation of the weight set of a weighted graph. That is, when integrating over cost, we eliminate the differences in topology that may be due to a monotonic transformation of the weight set. Our result holds for any unweighted topological measure, and for any choice of distribution over cost levels. Cost-integration is therefore helpful in disentangling differences in cost from differences in topology. By contrast, we show that the use of the weighted version of a topological metric is generally not a valid approach to this problem. Indeed, we prove that, under weak conditions, the use of the weighted version of global efficiency is equivalent to simply comparing weighted costs. Thus, we recommend the reporting of (i) differences in weighted costs and (ii) differences in cost-integrated topological measures with respect to different distributions over the cost domain. We demonstrate the application of these techniques in a re-analysis of an fMRI working memory task. We also provide a Monte Carlo method for approximating cost-integrated topological measures. Finally, we discuss the limitations of integrating topology over cost, which may pose problems when some weights are zero, when multiplicities exist in the ranks of the weights, and when one expects subtle cost-dependent topological differences, which could be masked by cost-integration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3145634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31456342011-08-09 Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration Ginestet, Cedric E. Nichols, Thomas E. Bullmore, Ed T. Simmons, Andrew PLoS One Research Article A statistically principled way of conducting brain network analysis is still lacking. Comparison of different populations of brain networks is hard because topology is inherently dependent on wiring cost, where cost is defined as the number of edges in an unweighted graph. In this paper, we evaluate the benefits and limitations associated with using cost-integrated topological metrics. Our focus is on comparing populations of weighted undirected graphs that differ in mean association weight, using global efficiency. Our key result shows that integrating over cost is equivalent to controlling for any monotonic transformation of the weight set of a weighted graph. That is, when integrating over cost, we eliminate the differences in topology that may be due to a monotonic transformation of the weight set. Our result holds for any unweighted topological measure, and for any choice of distribution over cost levels. Cost-integration is therefore helpful in disentangling differences in cost from differences in topology. By contrast, we show that the use of the weighted version of a topological metric is generally not a valid approach to this problem. Indeed, we prove that, under weak conditions, the use of the weighted version of global efficiency is equivalent to simply comparing weighted costs. Thus, we recommend the reporting of (i) differences in weighted costs and (ii) differences in cost-integrated topological measures with respect to different distributions over the cost domain. We demonstrate the application of these techniques in a re-analysis of an fMRI working memory task. We also provide a Monte Carlo method for approximating cost-integrated topological measures. Finally, we discuss the limitations of integrating topology over cost, which may pose problems when some weights are zero, when multiplicities exist in the ranks of the weights, and when one expects subtle cost-dependent topological differences, which could be masked by cost-integration. Public Library of Science 2011-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3145634/ /pubmed/21829437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021570 Text en Ginestet et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ginestet, Cedric E.
Nichols, Thomas E.
Bullmore, Ed T.
Simmons, Andrew
Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title_full Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title_fullStr Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title_full_unstemmed Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title_short Brain Network Analysis: Separating Cost from Topology Using Cost-Integration
title_sort brain network analysis: separating cost from topology using cost-integration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3145634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021570
work_keys_str_mv AT ginestetcedrice brainnetworkanalysisseparatingcostfromtopologyusingcostintegration
AT nicholsthomase brainnetworkanalysisseparatingcostfromtopologyusingcostintegration
AT bullmoreedt brainnetworkanalysisseparatingcostfromtopologyusingcostintegration
AT simmonsandrew brainnetworkanalysisseparatingcostfromtopologyusingcostintegration