Cargando…
Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814349 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605 |
_version_ | 1782209162785062912 |
---|---|
author | Cecchin, Doglas de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião Pécora, Jesus Djalma Gariba-Silva, Ricardo |
author_facet | Cecchin, Doglas de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião Pécora, Jesus Djalma Gariba-Silva, Ricardo |
author_sort | Cecchin, Doglas |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss from each acrylic resin block after instrumentation of a simulated canal using the Crown-down technique. RESULTS: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the studied groups. The Tukey's test showed that the acrylic resin blocks prepared with instruments K3 (0.00369 ± 0.00022), NiTi Tee (0.00368 ± 0.00023), and Profile (0.00351 ± 0.00026) presented the greatest mass loss, showing no statistically significant difference among them (P < 0.05). The lowest mass loss was found in the blocks prepared with Quantec instruments (0.00311 ± 0.0003) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It could be concluded that the K3, NiTi Tee, and Profile instruments presented a greater cutting efficiency than the Quantec instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3146100 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31461002011-08-03 Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments Cecchin, Doglas de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião Pécora, Jesus Djalma Gariba-Silva, Ricardo J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss from each acrylic resin block after instrumentation of a simulated canal using the Crown-down technique. RESULTS: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the studied groups. The Tukey's test showed that the acrylic resin blocks prepared with instruments K3 (0.00369 ± 0.00022), NiTi Tee (0.00368 ± 0.00023), and Profile (0.00351 ± 0.00026) presented the greatest mass loss, showing no statistically significant difference among them (P < 0.05). The lowest mass loss was found in the blocks prepared with Quantec instruments (0.00311 ± 0.0003) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It could be concluded that the K3, NiTi Tee, and Profile instruments presented a greater cutting efficiency than the Quantec instruments. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3146100/ /pubmed/21814349 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cecchin, Doglas de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião Pécora, Jesus Djalma Gariba-Silva, Ricardo Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title | Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title_full | Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title_fullStr | Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title_short | Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments |
title_sort | cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: titanium instruments |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146100/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814349 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cecchindoglas cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments AT desousanetomanoeldamiao cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments AT pecorajesusdjalma cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments AT garibasilvaricardo cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments |