Cargando…

Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cecchin, Doglas, de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião, Pécora, Jesus Djalma, Gariba-Silva, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814349
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605
_version_ 1782209162785062912
author Cecchin, Doglas
de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião
Pécora, Jesus Djalma
Gariba-Silva, Ricardo
author_facet Cecchin, Doglas
de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião
Pécora, Jesus Djalma
Gariba-Silva, Ricardo
author_sort Cecchin, Doglas
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss from each acrylic resin block after instrumentation of a simulated canal using the Crown-down technique. RESULTS: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the studied groups. The Tukey's test showed that the acrylic resin blocks prepared with instruments K3 (0.00369 ± 0.00022), NiTi Tee (0.00368 ± 0.00023), and Profile (0.00351 ± 0.00026) presented the greatest mass loss, showing no statistically significant difference among them (P < 0.05). The lowest mass loss was found in the blocks prepared with Quantec instruments (0.00311 ± 0.0003) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It could be concluded that the K3, NiTi Tee, and Profile instruments presented a greater cutting efficiency than the Quantec instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3146100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31461002011-08-03 Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments Cecchin, Doglas de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião Pécora, Jesus Djalma Gariba-Silva, Ricardo J Conserv Dent Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutting efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments K3, NiTi Tee, Profile, and Quantec with taper size 04/25. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The number of samples was 10 for each group (n = 10). The cutting efficiency was measured by the mass loss from each acrylic resin block after instrumentation of a simulated canal using the Crown-down technique. RESULTS: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that there was a statistically significant difference among the studied groups. The Tukey's test showed that the acrylic resin blocks prepared with instruments K3 (0.00369 ± 0.00022), NiTi Tee (0.00368 ± 0.00023), and Profile (0.00351 ± 0.00026) presented the greatest mass loss, showing no statistically significant difference among them (P < 0.05). The lowest mass loss was found in the blocks prepared with Quantec instruments (0.00311 ± 0.0003) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It could be concluded that the K3, NiTi Tee, and Profile instruments presented a greater cutting efficiency than the Quantec instruments. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3146100/ /pubmed/21814349 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605 Text en © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cecchin, Doglas
de Sousa-Neto, Manoel Damião
Pécora, Jesus Djalma
Gariba-Silva, Ricardo
Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title_full Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title_fullStr Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title_full_unstemmed Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title_short Cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: Titanium instruments
title_sort cutting efficiency of four different rotary nickel: titanium instruments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814349
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82605
work_keys_str_mv AT cecchindoglas cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments
AT desousanetomanoeldamiao cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments
AT pecorajesusdjalma cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments
AT garibasilvaricardo cuttingefficiencyoffourdifferentrotarynickeltitaniuminstruments