Cargando…

Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations

BACKGROUND: When large scale trials are investigating the effects of interventions on appetite, it is paramount to efficiently monitor large amounts of human data. The original hand-held Electronic Appetite Ratings System (EARS) was designed to facilitate the administering and data management of vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbons, Catherine, Caudwell, Phillipa, Finlayson, Graham, King, Neil, Blundell, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21651803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-57
_version_ 1782209199232516096
author Gibbons, Catherine
Caudwell, Phillipa
Finlayson, Graham
King, Neil
Blundell, John
author_facet Gibbons, Catherine
Caudwell, Phillipa
Finlayson, Graham
King, Neil
Blundell, John
author_sort Gibbons, Catherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When large scale trials are investigating the effects of interventions on appetite, it is paramount to efficiently monitor large amounts of human data. The original hand-held Electronic Appetite Ratings System (EARS) was designed to facilitate the administering and data management of visual analogue scales (VAS) of subjective appetite sensations. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel hand-held method (EARS II (HP(® )iPAQ)) against the standard Pen and Paper (P&P) method and the previously validated EARS. METHODS: Twelve participants (5 male, 7 female, aged 18-40) were involved in a fully repeated measures design. Participants were randomly assigned in a crossover design, to either high fat (>48% fat) or low fat (<28% fat) meal days, one week apart and completed ratings using the three data capture methods ordered according to Latin Square. The first set of appetite sensations was completed in a fasted state, immediately before a fixed breakfast. Thereafter, appetite sensations were completed every thirty minutes for 4h. An ad libitum lunch was provided immediately before completing a final set of appetite sensations. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted for ratings of hunger, fullness and desire to eat. There were no significant differences between P&P compared with either EARS or EARS II (p > 0.05). Correlation coefficients between P&P and EARS II, controlling for age and gender, were performed on Area Under the Curve ratings. R(2 )for Hunger (0.89), Fullness (0.96) and Desire to Eat (0.95) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EARS II was sensitive to the impact of a meal and recovery of appetite during the postprandial period and is therefore an effective device for monitoring appetite sensations. This study provides evidence and support for further validation of the novel EARS II method for monitoring appetite sensations during large scale studies. The added versatility means that future uses of the system provides the potential to monitor a range of other behavioural and physiological measures often important in clinical and free living trials. This study was registered as a clinical trial by Current Controlled Trials (Registration Number - ISRCTN47291569).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3146394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31463942011-07-30 Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations Gibbons, Catherine Caudwell, Phillipa Finlayson, Graham King, Neil Blundell, John Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Methodology BACKGROUND: When large scale trials are investigating the effects of interventions on appetite, it is paramount to efficiently monitor large amounts of human data. The original hand-held Electronic Appetite Ratings System (EARS) was designed to facilitate the administering and data management of visual analogue scales (VAS) of subjective appetite sensations. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel hand-held method (EARS II (HP(® )iPAQ)) against the standard Pen and Paper (P&P) method and the previously validated EARS. METHODS: Twelve participants (5 male, 7 female, aged 18-40) were involved in a fully repeated measures design. Participants were randomly assigned in a crossover design, to either high fat (>48% fat) or low fat (<28% fat) meal days, one week apart and completed ratings using the three data capture methods ordered according to Latin Square. The first set of appetite sensations was completed in a fasted state, immediately before a fixed breakfast. Thereafter, appetite sensations were completed every thirty minutes for 4h. An ad libitum lunch was provided immediately before completing a final set of appetite sensations. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVAs were conducted for ratings of hunger, fullness and desire to eat. There were no significant differences between P&P compared with either EARS or EARS II (p > 0.05). Correlation coefficients between P&P and EARS II, controlling for age and gender, were performed on Area Under the Curve ratings. R(2 )for Hunger (0.89), Fullness (0.96) and Desire to Eat (0.95) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: EARS II was sensitive to the impact of a meal and recovery of appetite during the postprandial period and is therefore an effective device for monitoring appetite sensations. This study provides evidence and support for further validation of the novel EARS II method for monitoring appetite sensations during large scale studies. The added versatility means that future uses of the system provides the potential to monitor a range of other behavioural and physiological measures often important in clinical and free living trials. This study was registered as a clinical trial by Current Controlled Trials (Registration Number - ISRCTN47291569). BioMed Central 2011-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3146394/ /pubmed/21651803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-57 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gibbons et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Gibbons, Catherine
Caudwell, Phillipa
Finlayson, Graham
King, Neil
Blundell, John
Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title_full Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title_fullStr Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title_short Validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
title_sort validation of a new hand-held electronic data capture method for continuous monitoring of subjective appetite sensations
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21651803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-57
work_keys_str_mv AT gibbonscatherine validationofanewhandheldelectronicdatacapturemethodforcontinuousmonitoringofsubjectiveappetitesensations
AT caudwellphillipa validationofanewhandheldelectronicdatacapturemethodforcontinuousmonitoringofsubjectiveappetitesensations
AT finlaysongraham validationofanewhandheldelectronicdatacapturemethodforcontinuousmonitoringofsubjectiveappetitesensations
AT kingneil validationofanewhandheldelectronicdatacapturemethodforcontinuousmonitoringofsubjectiveappetitesensations
AT blundelljohn validationofanewhandheldelectronicdatacapturemethodforcontinuousmonitoringofsubjectiveappetitesensations