Cargando…

Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine

BACKGROUND: Antigen presentation by non professional antigen presenting cells (APC) can lead to anergy. In genetic vaccines, targeting the macrophages and APC for efficient antigen presentation might lead to balanced immune response. One such approach is to incorporate APC specific promoter in the v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz, Gore, Milind M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-9-10
_version_ 1782209239061626880
author Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz
Gore, Milind M
author_facet Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz
Gore, Milind M
author_sort Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antigen presentation by non professional antigen presenting cells (APC) can lead to anergy. In genetic vaccines, targeting the macrophages and APC for efficient antigen presentation might lead to balanced immune response. One such approach is to incorporate APC specific promoter in the vector to be used. METHODS: Three promoters known to be active in macrophage were selected and cloned in mammalian expressing vector (pAcGFP1-N1) to reconstruct (pAcGFP-MS), (pAcGFP-EMR) and (pAcGFP-B5I) with macrosialin, EmrI and Beta-5 Integrin promoters respectively. As a positive control (pAcGFP-CMV) was used with CMV promoter and promoterless vector (pAcGFP-NIX) which served as a negative control. GFP gene was used as readout under the control of each of the promoter. The expression of GFP was analyzed on macrophage and non-macrophage cell lines using Flow cytometry and qRT-PCR with TaqMan probe chemistries. RESULTS: All the promoters in question were dominant to macrophage lineage cell lines as observed by fluorescence, Western blot and quantitative RT-PCR. The activity of macrosialin was significantly higher than other macrophage promoters. CMV promoter showed 1.83 times higher activity in macrophage cell lines. The expression of GFP driven by macrosialin promoter after 24 hours was 4.40 times higher in macrophage derived cell lines in comparison with non macrophage cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, macrosialin promoter can be utilized for targeting macrophage dominant expression. In vivo study needs to be carried out for its utility as a vaccine candidate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3146807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31468072011-07-31 Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz Gore, Milind M Genet Vaccines Ther Research BACKGROUND: Antigen presentation by non professional antigen presenting cells (APC) can lead to anergy. In genetic vaccines, targeting the macrophages and APC for efficient antigen presentation might lead to balanced immune response. One such approach is to incorporate APC specific promoter in the vector to be used. METHODS: Three promoters known to be active in macrophage were selected and cloned in mammalian expressing vector (pAcGFP1-N1) to reconstruct (pAcGFP-MS), (pAcGFP-EMR) and (pAcGFP-B5I) with macrosialin, EmrI and Beta-5 Integrin promoters respectively. As a positive control (pAcGFP-CMV) was used with CMV promoter and promoterless vector (pAcGFP-NIX) which served as a negative control. GFP gene was used as readout under the control of each of the promoter. The expression of GFP was analyzed on macrophage and non-macrophage cell lines using Flow cytometry and qRT-PCR with TaqMan probe chemistries. RESULTS: All the promoters in question were dominant to macrophage lineage cell lines as observed by fluorescence, Western blot and quantitative RT-PCR. The activity of macrosialin was significantly higher than other macrophage promoters. CMV promoter showed 1.83 times higher activity in macrophage cell lines. The expression of GFP driven by macrosialin promoter after 24 hours was 4.40 times higher in macrophage derived cell lines in comparison with non macrophage cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, macrosialin promoter can be utilized for targeting macrophage dominant expression. In vivo study needs to be carried out for its utility as a vaccine candidate. BioMed Central 2011-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3146807/ /pubmed/21682913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-9-10 Text en Copyright ©2011 Ahsan and Gore; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ahsan, Mohammad Feraz
Gore, Milind M
Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title_full Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title_short Comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
title_sort comparative analysis of macrophage associated vectors for use in genetic vaccine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21682913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-9-10
work_keys_str_mv AT ahsanmohammadferaz comparativeanalysisofmacrophageassociatedvectorsforuseingeneticvaccine
AT goremilindm comparativeanalysisofmacrophageassociatedvectorsforuseingeneticvaccine