Cargando…

Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation

BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sepucha, Karen R, Stacey, Dawn, Clay, Catharine F, Chang, Yuchiao, Cosenza, Carol, Dervin, Geoffrey, Dorrwachter, Janet, Feibelmann, Sandra, Katz, Jeffrey N, Kearing, Stephen A, Malchau, Henrik, Taljaard, Monica, Tomek, Ivan, Tugwell, Peter, Levin, Carrie A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149
_version_ 1782209262284439552
author Sepucha, Karen R
Stacey, Dawn
Clay, Catharine F
Chang, Yuchiao
Cosenza, Carol
Dervin, Geoffrey
Dorrwachter, Janet
Feibelmann, Sandra
Katz, Jeffrey N
Kearing, Stephen A
Malchau, Henrik
Taljaard, Monica
Tomek, Ivan
Tugwell, Peter
Levin, Carrie A
author_facet Sepucha, Karen R
Stacey, Dawn
Clay, Catharine F
Chang, Yuchiao
Cosenza, Carol
Dervin, Geoffrey
Dorrwachter, Janet
Feibelmann, Sandra
Katz, Jeffrey N
Kearing, Stephen A
Malchau, Henrik
Taljaard, Monica
Tomek, Ivan
Tugwell, Peter
Levin, Carrie A
author_sort Sepucha, Karen R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibility of a patient self report instrument, to measure the quality of decisions about total joint replacement for knee or hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: The performance of the Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI) was evaluated in two samples: (1) a cross-sectional mail survey with 489 patients and 77 providers (study 1); and (2) a randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid with 138 osteoarthritis patients considering total joint replacement (study 2). The HK-DQI results in two scores. Knowledge items are summed to create a total knowledge score, and a set of goals and concerns are used in a logistic regression model to develop a concordance score. The concordance score measures the proportion of patients whose treatment matched their goals. Hypotheses related to acceptability, feasibility, reliability and validity of the knowledge and concordance scores were examined. RESULTS: In study 1, the HK-DQI was completed by 382 patients (79%) and 45 providers (58%), and in study 2 by 127 patients (92%), with low rates of missing data. The DQI-knowledge score was reproducible (ICC = 0.81) and demonstrated discriminant validity (68% decision aid vs. 54% control, and 78% providers vs. 61% patients) and content validity. The concordance score demonstrated predictive validity, as patients whose treatments were concordant with their goals had more confidence and less regret with their decision compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The HK-DQI is feasible and acceptable to patients. It can be used to assess whether patients with osteoarthritis are making informed decisions about surgery that are concordant with their goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3146909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31469092011-07-31 Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation Sepucha, Karen R Stacey, Dawn Clay, Catharine F Chang, Yuchiao Cosenza, Carol Dervin, Geoffrey Dorrwachter, Janet Feibelmann, Sandra Katz, Jeffrey N Kearing, Stephen A Malchau, Henrik Taljaard, Monica Tomek, Ivan Tugwell, Peter Levin, Carrie A BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibility of a patient self report instrument, to measure the quality of decisions about total joint replacement for knee or hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: The performance of the Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI) was evaluated in two samples: (1) a cross-sectional mail survey with 489 patients and 77 providers (study 1); and (2) a randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid with 138 osteoarthritis patients considering total joint replacement (study 2). The HK-DQI results in two scores. Knowledge items are summed to create a total knowledge score, and a set of goals and concerns are used in a logistic regression model to develop a concordance score. The concordance score measures the proportion of patients whose treatment matched their goals. Hypotheses related to acceptability, feasibility, reliability and validity of the knowledge and concordance scores were examined. RESULTS: In study 1, the HK-DQI was completed by 382 patients (79%) and 45 providers (58%), and in study 2 by 127 patients (92%), with low rates of missing data. The DQI-knowledge score was reproducible (ICC = 0.81) and demonstrated discriminant validity (68% decision aid vs. 54% control, and 78% providers vs. 61% patients) and content validity. The concordance score demonstrated predictive validity, as patients whose treatments were concordant with their goals had more confidence and less regret with their decision compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The HK-DQI is feasible and acceptable to patients. It can be used to assess whether patients with osteoarthritis are making informed decisions about surgery that are concordant with their goals. BioMed Central 2011-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3146909/ /pubmed/21729315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149 Text en Copyright ©2011 Sepucha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sepucha, Karen R
Stacey, Dawn
Clay, Catharine F
Chang, Yuchiao
Cosenza, Carol
Dervin, Geoffrey
Dorrwachter, Janet
Feibelmann, Sandra
Katz, Jeffrey N
Kearing, Stephen A
Malchau, Henrik
Taljaard, Monica
Tomek, Ivan
Tugwell, Peter
Levin, Carrie A
Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title_full Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title_fullStr Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title_short Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
title_sort decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149
work_keys_str_mv AT sepuchakarenr decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT staceydawn decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT claycatharinef decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT changyuchiao decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT cosenzacarol decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT dervingeoffrey decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT dorrwachterjanet decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT feibelmannsandra decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT katzjeffreyn decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT kearingstephena decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT malchauhenrik decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT taljaardmonica decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT tomekivan decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT tugwellpeter decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation
AT levincarriea decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation