Cargando…
Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation
BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149 |
_version_ | 1782209262284439552 |
---|---|
author | Sepucha, Karen R Stacey, Dawn Clay, Catharine F Chang, Yuchiao Cosenza, Carol Dervin, Geoffrey Dorrwachter, Janet Feibelmann, Sandra Katz, Jeffrey N Kearing, Stephen A Malchau, Henrik Taljaard, Monica Tomek, Ivan Tugwell, Peter Levin, Carrie A |
author_facet | Sepucha, Karen R Stacey, Dawn Clay, Catharine F Chang, Yuchiao Cosenza, Carol Dervin, Geoffrey Dorrwachter, Janet Feibelmann, Sandra Katz, Jeffrey N Kearing, Stephen A Malchau, Henrik Taljaard, Monica Tomek, Ivan Tugwell, Peter Levin, Carrie A |
author_sort | Sepucha, Karen R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibility of a patient self report instrument, to measure the quality of decisions about total joint replacement for knee or hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: The performance of the Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI) was evaluated in two samples: (1) a cross-sectional mail survey with 489 patients and 77 providers (study 1); and (2) a randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid with 138 osteoarthritis patients considering total joint replacement (study 2). The HK-DQI results in two scores. Knowledge items are summed to create a total knowledge score, and a set of goals and concerns are used in a logistic regression model to develop a concordance score. The concordance score measures the proportion of patients whose treatment matched their goals. Hypotheses related to acceptability, feasibility, reliability and validity of the knowledge and concordance scores were examined. RESULTS: In study 1, the HK-DQI was completed by 382 patients (79%) and 45 providers (58%), and in study 2 by 127 patients (92%), with low rates of missing data. The DQI-knowledge score was reproducible (ICC = 0.81) and demonstrated discriminant validity (68% decision aid vs. 54% control, and 78% providers vs. 61% patients) and content validity. The concordance score demonstrated predictive validity, as patients whose treatments were concordant with their goals had more confidence and less regret with their decision compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The HK-DQI is feasible and acceptable to patients. It can be used to assess whether patients with osteoarthritis are making informed decisions about surgery that are concordant with their goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3146909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31469092011-07-31 Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation Sepucha, Karen R Stacey, Dawn Clay, Catharine F Chang, Yuchiao Cosenza, Carol Dervin, Geoffrey Dorrwachter, Janet Feibelmann, Sandra Katz, Jeffrey N Kearing, Stephen A Malchau, Henrik Taljaard, Monica Tomek, Ivan Tugwell, Peter Levin, Carrie A BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A high quality decision requires that patients who meet clinical criteria for surgery are informed about the options (including non-surgical alternatives) and receive treatments that match their goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical sensibility of a patient self report instrument, to measure the quality of decisions about total joint replacement for knee or hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: The performance of the Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI) was evaluated in two samples: (1) a cross-sectional mail survey with 489 patients and 77 providers (study 1); and (2) a randomized controlled trial of a patient decision aid with 138 osteoarthritis patients considering total joint replacement (study 2). The HK-DQI results in two scores. Knowledge items are summed to create a total knowledge score, and a set of goals and concerns are used in a logistic regression model to develop a concordance score. The concordance score measures the proportion of patients whose treatment matched their goals. Hypotheses related to acceptability, feasibility, reliability and validity of the knowledge and concordance scores were examined. RESULTS: In study 1, the HK-DQI was completed by 382 patients (79%) and 45 providers (58%), and in study 2 by 127 patients (92%), with low rates of missing data. The DQI-knowledge score was reproducible (ICC = 0.81) and demonstrated discriminant validity (68% decision aid vs. 54% control, and 78% providers vs. 61% patients) and content validity. The concordance score demonstrated predictive validity, as patients whose treatments were concordant with their goals had more confidence and less regret with their decision compared to those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The HK-DQI is feasible and acceptable to patients. It can be used to assess whether patients with osteoarthritis are making informed decisions about surgery that are concordant with their goals. BioMed Central 2011-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3146909/ /pubmed/21729315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149 Text en Copyright ©2011 Sepucha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sepucha, Karen R Stacey, Dawn Clay, Catharine F Chang, Yuchiao Cosenza, Carol Dervin, Geoffrey Dorrwachter, Janet Feibelmann, Sandra Katz, Jeffrey N Kearing, Stephen A Malchau, Henrik Taljaard, Monica Tomek, Ivan Tugwell, Peter Levin, Carrie A Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title | Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title_full | Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title_fullStr | Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title_short | Decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
title_sort | decision quality instrument for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a psychometric evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21729315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sepuchakarenr decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT staceydawn decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT claycatharinef decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT changyuchiao decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT cosenzacarol decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT dervingeoffrey decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT dorrwachterjanet decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT feibelmannsandra decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT katzjeffreyn decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT kearingstephena decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT malchauhenrik decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT taljaardmonica decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT tomekivan decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT tugwellpeter decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation AT levincarriea decisionqualityinstrumentfortreatmentofhipandkneeosteoarthritisapsychometricevaluation |