Cargando…

Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND: Integrins are used as prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Following engagement with extracellular matrix proteins, their signaling influences numerous cellular processes including migration, proliferation, and death. Integrin signaling varies between cell types through differential e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taherian, Aliakbar, Li, Xinlei, Liu, Yongqing, Haas, Thomas A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-293
_version_ 1782209270188605440
author Taherian, Aliakbar
Li, Xinlei
Liu, Yongqing
Haas, Thomas A
author_facet Taherian, Aliakbar
Li, Xinlei
Liu, Yongqing
Haas, Thomas A
author_sort Taherian, Aliakbar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Integrins are used as prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Following engagement with extracellular matrix proteins, their signaling influences numerous cellular processes including migration, proliferation, and death. Integrin signaling varies between cell types through differential expression of integrin subunits, and changes within a given cell upon exposure to a cell agonist or through changes in its surroundings. These variations in signaling can profoundly affect the phenotypic, tumorogenecity and metastatic properties of cancer cells. In the present study, we investigated if there were differences in the expression of integrins, integrin structures, and integrin co-receptors within three breast cancer cells and if these differences effected integrin signaling. METHODS: Expression of integrins, urokinase receptor and vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor (VEGFR) in metastatic MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231, non-metastatic MCF7 and non-breast cancer Hek-293 cells was measured by flow cytometry. Cell adhesion was assessed using collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin and vitronectin coated plates. Changes in kinase levels following PMA stimulation, and cell adhesion-induced activation of kinases were determined by western blot analysis. Distribution of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions was assessed by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: All cells expressed α(v )integrins, while high β(5 )and α(v)β(5 )expression was restricted to the cancer cells and high β(3 )and α(v)β(3 )expression was restricted to MDA-MB-435 cells. The two metastatic cells were the least adhesive, but all cells adhered well to most proteins in the absence of PMA. All proliferating cells expressed activated pSrc, but only proliferating metastatic cells expressed high pMEK levels. PMA treatment resulted in time-dependent changes in activated kinase levels, and only MDA-MB-231 cells constitutively expressed high levels of activated pMEK. MDA-MB-435 cells formed more stress fibers and focal adhesions and only exhibited adhesion-induced activation of pMEK and pFAK. All cells expressed the urokinase receptor, but MCF7 cells had markedly higher VEGFR expression. Adhesion induced differential expression of pFAK, pMEK and pERK. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that breast cancers vary in their expression of integrins, their capacity to form focal adhesion and to signal through integrins. These differences likely contribute to phenotypic variations between cancer lines and account for some of the heterogeneity of breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3146943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31469432011-07-31 Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells Taherian, Aliakbar Li, Xinlei Liu, Yongqing Haas, Thomas A BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Integrins are used as prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Following engagement with extracellular matrix proteins, their signaling influences numerous cellular processes including migration, proliferation, and death. Integrin signaling varies between cell types through differential expression of integrin subunits, and changes within a given cell upon exposure to a cell agonist or through changes in its surroundings. These variations in signaling can profoundly affect the phenotypic, tumorogenecity and metastatic properties of cancer cells. In the present study, we investigated if there were differences in the expression of integrins, integrin structures, and integrin co-receptors within three breast cancer cells and if these differences effected integrin signaling. METHODS: Expression of integrins, urokinase receptor and vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor (VEGFR) in metastatic MDA-MB-435 and MDA-MB-231, non-metastatic MCF7 and non-breast cancer Hek-293 cells was measured by flow cytometry. Cell adhesion was assessed using collagen, fibrinogen, fibronectin and vitronectin coated plates. Changes in kinase levels following PMA stimulation, and cell adhesion-induced activation of kinases were determined by western blot analysis. Distribution of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions was assessed by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: All cells expressed α(v )integrins, while high β(5 )and α(v)β(5 )expression was restricted to the cancer cells and high β(3 )and α(v)β(3 )expression was restricted to MDA-MB-435 cells. The two metastatic cells were the least adhesive, but all cells adhered well to most proteins in the absence of PMA. All proliferating cells expressed activated pSrc, but only proliferating metastatic cells expressed high pMEK levels. PMA treatment resulted in time-dependent changes in activated kinase levels, and only MDA-MB-231 cells constitutively expressed high levels of activated pMEK. MDA-MB-435 cells formed more stress fibers and focal adhesions and only exhibited adhesion-induced activation of pMEK and pFAK. All cells expressed the urokinase receptor, but MCF7 cells had markedly higher VEGFR expression. Adhesion induced differential expression of pFAK, pMEK and pERK. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that breast cancers vary in their expression of integrins, their capacity to form focal adhesion and to signal through integrins. These differences likely contribute to phenotypic variations between cancer lines and account for some of the heterogeneity of breast cancer. BioMed Central 2011-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3146943/ /pubmed/21752268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-293 Text en Copyright ©2011 Taherian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Taherian, Aliakbar
Li, Xinlei
Liu, Yongqing
Haas, Thomas A
Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title_full Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title_fullStr Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title_full_unstemmed Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title_short Differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
title_sort differences in integrin expression and signaling within human breast cancer cells
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21752268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-293
work_keys_str_mv AT taherianaliakbar differencesinintegrinexpressionandsignalingwithinhumanbreastcancercells
AT lixinlei differencesinintegrinexpressionandsignalingwithinhumanbreastcancercells
AT liuyongqing differencesinintegrinexpressionandsignalingwithinhumanbreastcancercells
AT haasthomasa differencesinintegrinexpressionandsignalingwithinhumanbreastcancercells