Cargando…

Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation

BACKGROUND: It is well known that psychological components are very important in the aging process and may also manifest in psychogenic movement disorders, such as coxarthrosis. This study analyzed the medical records of two similar groups of patients with coxarthrosis (n = 15 in each) who were trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castagna, Alessandro, Rinaldi, Salvatore, Fontani, Vania, Mannu, Piero, Margotti, Matteo Lotti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822376
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23130
_version_ 1782209288041660416
author Castagna, Alessandro
Rinaldi, Salvatore
Fontani, Vania
Mannu, Piero
Margotti, Matteo Lotti
author_facet Castagna, Alessandro
Rinaldi, Salvatore
Fontani, Vania
Mannu, Piero
Margotti, Matteo Lotti
author_sort Castagna, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well known that psychological components are very important in the aging process and may also manifest in psychogenic movement disorders, such as coxarthrosis. This study analyzed the medical records of two similar groups of patients with coxarthrosis (n = 15 in each) who were treated in two different clinics for rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: Patients in Group A were treated with a course of traditional physiotherapy, including sessions of local hyperthermia. Group B patients were treated with only a course of radioelectric asymmetrical brain stimulation (REAC) to improve their motor behavior. RESULTS: Group A showed a significant decrease in symptoms of pain and stiffness, and an insignificant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. A single patient in this group developed worsened symptoms, and pain did not resolve completely in any patient. The patients in Group B had significantly decreased levels of pain and stiffness, and a significant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. No patients worsened in Group B, and the pain resolved completely in one patient. CONCLUSION: Both treatments were shown to be tolerable and safe. Patients who underwent REAC treatment appeared to have slightly better outcomes, with an appreciable improvement in both their physical and mental states. These aspects are particularly important in the elderly, in whom functional limitation is often associated with or exacerbated by a psychogenic component.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3147051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31470512011-08-05 Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation Castagna, Alessandro Rinaldi, Salvatore Fontani, Vania Mannu, Piero Margotti, Matteo Lotti Clin Interv Aging Original Research BACKGROUND: It is well known that psychological components are very important in the aging process and may also manifest in psychogenic movement disorders, such as coxarthrosis. This study analyzed the medical records of two similar groups of patients with coxarthrosis (n = 15 in each) who were treated in two different clinics for rehabilitation therapy. METHODS: Patients in Group A were treated with a course of traditional physiotherapy, including sessions of local hyperthermia. Group B patients were treated with only a course of radioelectric asymmetrical brain stimulation (REAC) to improve their motor behavior. RESULTS: Group A showed a significant decrease in symptoms of pain and stiffness, and an insignificant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. A single patient in this group developed worsened symptoms, and pain did not resolve completely in any patient. The patients in Group B had significantly decreased levels of pain and stiffness, and a significant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. No patients worsened in Group B, and the pain resolved completely in one patient. CONCLUSION: Both treatments were shown to be tolerable and safe. Patients who underwent REAC treatment appeared to have slightly better outcomes, with an appreciable improvement in both their physical and mental states. These aspects are particularly important in the elderly, in whom functional limitation is often associated with or exacerbated by a psychogenic component. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3147051/ /pubmed/21822376 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23130 Text en © 2011 Castagna et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Castagna, Alessandro
Rinaldi, Salvatore
Fontani, Vania
Mannu, Piero
Margotti, Matteo Lotti
Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title_full Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title_fullStr Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title_short Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
title_sort comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822376
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S23130
work_keys_str_mv AT castagnaalessandro comparisonoftwotreatmentsforcoxarthrosislocalhyperthermiaversusradioelectricasymmetricalbrainstimulation
AT rinaldisalvatore comparisonoftwotreatmentsforcoxarthrosislocalhyperthermiaversusradioelectricasymmetricalbrainstimulation
AT fontanivania comparisonoftwotreatmentsforcoxarthrosislocalhyperthermiaversusradioelectricasymmetricalbrainstimulation
AT mannupiero comparisonoftwotreatmentsforcoxarthrosislocalhyperthermiaversusradioelectricasymmetricalbrainstimulation
AT margottimatteolotti comparisonoftwotreatmentsforcoxarthrosislocalhyperthermiaversusradioelectricasymmetricalbrainstimulation