Cargando…
A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between obj...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248 |
_version_ | 1782209290038149120 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Simon Ekelund, Ulf Jebb, Susan Lindroos, Anna Karin Mander, Adrian Sharp, Stephen Turner, Rebecca Wilks, Désirée |
author_facet | Thompson, Simon Ekelund, Ulf Jebb, Susan Lindroos, Anna Karin Mander, Adrian Sharp, Stephen Turner, Rebecca Wilks, Désirée |
author_sort | Thompson, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and subsequent change in adiposity in children. Methods We separated internal biases that reflect study quality from external biases that reflect generalizability to a target setting. Since published results were presented in different formats, these were all converted to correlation coefficients. Biases were considered as additive or proportional on the correlation scale. Opinions about the extent of each bias in each study, together with its uncertainty, were elicited in a formal process from quantitatively trained assessors for the internal biases and subject-matter specialists for the external biases. Bias-adjusted results for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling, and results combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis. Results Before adjusting for bias, the pooled correlation is difficult to interpret because the studies varied substantially in quality and design, and there was considerable heterogeneity. After adjusting for both the internal and external biases, the pooled correlation provides a meaningful quantitative summary of all available evidence, and the confidence interval incorporates the elicited uncertainties about the extent of the biases. In the adjusted meta-analysis, there was no apparent heterogeneity. Conclusion This approach provides a viable method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of observational studies, allowing the quantitative synthesis of evidence from otherwise incompatible studies. From the meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies, we conclude that there is no evidence that physical activity is associated with gain in body fat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3147067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31470672011-08-02 A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies Thompson, Simon Ekelund, Ulf Jebb, Susan Lindroos, Anna Karin Mander, Adrian Sharp, Stephen Turner, Rebecca Wilks, Désirée Int J Epidemiol Theory and Methods Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and subsequent change in adiposity in children. Methods We separated internal biases that reflect study quality from external biases that reflect generalizability to a target setting. Since published results were presented in different formats, these were all converted to correlation coefficients. Biases were considered as additive or proportional on the correlation scale. Opinions about the extent of each bias in each study, together with its uncertainty, were elicited in a formal process from quantitatively trained assessors for the internal biases and subject-matter specialists for the external biases. Bias-adjusted results for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling, and results combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis. Results Before adjusting for bias, the pooled correlation is difficult to interpret because the studies varied substantially in quality and design, and there was considerable heterogeneity. After adjusting for both the internal and external biases, the pooled correlation provides a meaningful quantitative summary of all available evidence, and the confidence interval incorporates the elicited uncertainties about the extent of the biases. In the adjusted meta-analysis, there was no apparent heterogeneity. Conclusion This approach provides a viable method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of observational studies, allowing the quantitative synthesis of evidence from otherwise incompatible studies. From the meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies, we conclude that there is no evidence that physical activity is associated with gain in body fat. Oxford University Press 2011-06 2010-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3147067/ /pubmed/21186183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. © The Author 2010; all rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Theory and Methods Thompson, Simon Ekelund, Ulf Jebb, Susan Lindroos, Anna Karin Mander, Adrian Sharp, Stephen Turner, Rebecca Wilks, Désirée A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title | A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title_full | A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title_fullStr | A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title_short | A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
title_sort | proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies |
topic | Theory and Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonsimon aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT ekelundulf aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT jebbsusan aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT lindroosannakarin aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT manderadrian aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT sharpstephen aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT turnerrebecca aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT wilksdesiree aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT thompsonsimon proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT ekelundulf proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT jebbsusan proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT lindroosannakarin proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT manderadrian proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT sharpstephen proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT turnerrebecca proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies AT wilksdesiree proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies |