Cargando…

A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies

Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Simon, Ekelund, Ulf, Jebb, Susan, Lindroos, Anna Karin, Mander, Adrian, Sharp, Stephen, Turner, Rebecca, Wilks, Désirée
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248
_version_ 1782209290038149120
author Thompson, Simon
Ekelund, Ulf
Jebb, Susan
Lindroos, Anna Karin
Mander, Adrian
Sharp, Stephen
Turner, Rebecca
Wilks, Désirée
author_facet Thompson, Simon
Ekelund, Ulf
Jebb, Susan
Lindroos, Anna Karin
Mander, Adrian
Sharp, Stephen
Turner, Rebecca
Wilks, Désirée
author_sort Thompson, Simon
collection PubMed
description Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and subsequent change in adiposity in children. Methods We separated internal biases that reflect study quality from external biases that reflect generalizability to a target setting. Since published results were presented in different formats, these were all converted to correlation coefficients. Biases were considered as additive or proportional on the correlation scale. Opinions about the extent of each bias in each study, together with its uncertainty, were elicited in a formal process from quantitatively trained assessors for the internal biases and subject-matter specialists for the external biases. Bias-adjusted results for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling, and results combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis. Results Before adjusting for bias, the pooled correlation is difficult to interpret because the studies varied substantially in quality and design, and there was considerable heterogeneity. After adjusting for both the internal and external biases, the pooled correlation provides a meaningful quantitative summary of all available evidence, and the confidence interval incorporates the elicited uncertainties about the extent of the biases. In the adjusted meta-analysis, there was no apparent heterogeneity. Conclusion This approach provides a viable method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of observational studies, allowing the quantitative synthesis of evidence from otherwise incompatible studies. From the meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies, we conclude that there is no evidence that physical activity is associated with gain in body fat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3147067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31470672011-08-02 A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies Thompson, Simon Ekelund, Ulf Jebb, Susan Lindroos, Anna Karin Mander, Adrian Sharp, Stephen Turner, Rebecca Wilks, Désirée Int J Epidemiol Theory and Methods Objective Interpretation of meta-analyses of published observational studies is problematic because of numerous sources of bias. We develop bias assessment, elicitation and adjustment methods, and apply them to a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and subsequent change in adiposity in children. Methods We separated internal biases that reflect study quality from external biases that reflect generalizability to a target setting. Since published results were presented in different formats, these were all converted to correlation coefficients. Biases were considered as additive or proportional on the correlation scale. Opinions about the extent of each bias in each study, together with its uncertainty, were elicited in a formal process from quantitatively trained assessors for the internal biases and subject-matter specialists for the external biases. Bias-adjusted results for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling, and results combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis. Results Before adjusting for bias, the pooled correlation is difficult to interpret because the studies varied substantially in quality and design, and there was considerable heterogeneity. After adjusting for both the internal and external biases, the pooled correlation provides a meaningful quantitative summary of all available evidence, and the confidence interval incorporates the elicited uncertainties about the extent of the biases. In the adjusted meta-analysis, there was no apparent heterogeneity. Conclusion This approach provides a viable method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of observational studies, allowing the quantitative synthesis of evidence from otherwise incompatible studies. From the meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies, we conclude that there is no evidence that physical activity is associated with gain in body fat. Oxford University Press 2011-06 2010-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3147067/ /pubmed/21186183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248 Text en Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. © The Author 2010; all rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Theory and Methods
Thompson, Simon
Ekelund, Ulf
Jebb, Susan
Lindroos, Anna Karin
Mander, Adrian
Sharp, Stephen
Turner, Rebecca
Wilks, Désirée
A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title_full A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title_fullStr A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title_full_unstemmed A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title_short A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
title_sort proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies
topic Theory and Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3147067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21186183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonsimon aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT ekelundulf aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT jebbsusan aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT lindroosannakarin aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT manderadrian aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT sharpstephen aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT turnerrebecca aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT wilksdesiree aproposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT thompsonsimon proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT ekelundulf proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT jebbsusan proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT lindroosannakarin proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT manderadrian proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT sharpstephen proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT turnerrebecca proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies
AT wilksdesiree proposedmethodofbiasadjustmentformetaanalysesofpublishedobservationalstudies