Cargando…

Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients

PURPOSE: Introducing the relationship between the surgical instruments used in modified radical mastectomy and wound complications is important for preventing and decreasing complications. This prospective randomized trial was designed to assess the impact of scalpel, electrocautery, and ultrasonic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yilmaz, Kerim Bora, Dogan, Lutfi, Nalbant, Handan, Akinci, Melih, Karaman, Niyazi, Ozaslan, Cihangir, Kulacoglu, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.58
_version_ 1782209350869188608
author Yilmaz, Kerim Bora
Dogan, Lutfi
Nalbant, Handan
Akinci, Melih
Karaman, Niyazi
Ozaslan, Cihangir
Kulacoglu, Hakan
author_facet Yilmaz, Kerim Bora
Dogan, Lutfi
Nalbant, Handan
Akinci, Melih
Karaman, Niyazi
Ozaslan, Cihangir
Kulacoglu, Hakan
author_sort Yilmaz, Kerim Bora
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Introducing the relationship between the surgical instruments used in modified radical mastectomy and wound complications is important for preventing and decreasing complications. This prospective randomized trial was designed to assess the impact of scalpel, electrocautery, and ultrasonic dissector usage on wound complications and tissue damage. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients operated with mastectomy were studied. The postoperative time period needed for hemovac drainage, the amount and duration of seroma, infection, flap ecchymosis and necrosis rates were compared. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in drainage fluids were determined to confirm the inflammatory response and tissue damage. RESULTS: The numbers of patients included in the scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector groups were 27, 26, and 29, respectively. The groups were homogenous with respect to age, body mass index, stage, cormorbidities, breast volume and flap area. Operation time and the amount of bleeding were statistically higher in the scalpel group. The incidence of seroma was higher in the electrocautery group and arm mobilization had to be delayed in this group. There were no differences between groups with respect to hematoma, infection, ecchymosis, necrosis, hemovac drainage and the total and first 3 days of seroma volume. TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in samples obtained from the drains of patients operated with electrocautery. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector decreases operation time by decreasing the amount of bleeding without increasing the seroma incidence. High cytokine levels in drainage fluids from patients operated with elecrocautery indicates that electrocautery induces more tissue damage and acute inflammatory response. Therefore, seroma, due to acute inflammatory response, was seen more frequently in the electrocautery group. Ultrasonic dissector coagulates protein by breaking hydrogen bonds which may close vascular and lymphatic channels more precisely. But, its actual preventive effect on seroma formation might be related to diminished inflammatory response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3148508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31485082011-08-16 Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients Yilmaz, Kerim Bora Dogan, Lutfi Nalbant, Handan Akinci, Melih Karaman, Niyazi Ozaslan, Cihangir Kulacoglu, Hakan J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Introducing the relationship between the surgical instruments used in modified radical mastectomy and wound complications is important for preventing and decreasing complications. This prospective randomized trial was designed to assess the impact of scalpel, electrocautery, and ultrasonic dissector usage on wound complications and tissue damage. METHODS: Eighty-two consecutive patients operated with mastectomy were studied. The postoperative time period needed for hemovac drainage, the amount and duration of seroma, infection, flap ecchymosis and necrosis rates were compared. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in drainage fluids were determined to confirm the inflammatory response and tissue damage. RESULTS: The numbers of patients included in the scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector groups were 27, 26, and 29, respectively. The groups were homogenous with respect to age, body mass index, stage, cormorbidities, breast volume and flap area. Operation time and the amount of bleeding were statistically higher in the scalpel group. The incidence of seroma was higher in the electrocautery group and arm mobilization had to be delayed in this group. There were no differences between groups with respect to hematoma, infection, ecchymosis, necrosis, hemovac drainage and the total and first 3 days of seroma volume. TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in samples obtained from the drains of patients operated with electrocautery. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic dissector decreases operation time by decreasing the amount of bleeding without increasing the seroma incidence. High cytokine levels in drainage fluids from patients operated with elecrocautery indicates that electrocautery induces more tissue damage and acute inflammatory response. Therefore, seroma, due to acute inflammatory response, was seen more frequently in the electrocautery group. Ultrasonic dissector coagulates protein by breaking hydrogen bonds which may close vascular and lymphatic channels more precisely. But, its actual preventive effect on seroma formation might be related to diminished inflammatory response. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2011-03 2011-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3148508/ /pubmed/21847396 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.58 Text en © 2011 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yilmaz, Kerim Bora
Dogan, Lutfi
Nalbant, Handan
Akinci, Melih
Karaman, Niyazi
Ozaslan, Cihangir
Kulacoglu, Hakan
Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title_full Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title_fullStr Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title_short Comparing Scalpel, Electrocautery and Ultrasonic Dissector Effects: The Impact on Wound Complications and Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels in Wound Fluid from Mastectomy Patients
title_sort comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847396
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.1.58
work_keys_str_mv AT yilmazkerimbora comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT doganlutfi comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT nalbanthandan comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT akincimelih comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT karamanniyazi comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT ozaslancihangir comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients
AT kulacogluhakan comparingscalpelelectrocauteryandultrasonicdissectoreffectstheimpactonwoundcomplicationsandproinflammatorycytokinelevelsinwoundfluidfrommastectomypatients