Cargando…

Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer

PURPOSE: Physiological respiratory motion of tumors growing in the lung can be corrected with respiratory gating when treated with radiotherapy (RT). The optimal respiratory phase for beam-on may be assessed with a respiratory phase optimizer (RPO), a 4D image processing software developed with this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peguret, Nicolas, Vock, Jacqueline, Vinh-Hung, Vincent, Fenoglietto, Pascal, Azria, David, Zaidi, Habib, Wissmeyer, Michael, Ratib, Osman, Miralbell, Raymond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21702952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-78
_version_ 1782209354472095744
author Peguret, Nicolas
Vock, Jacqueline
Vinh-Hung, Vincent
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Azria, David
Zaidi, Habib
Wissmeyer, Michael
Ratib, Osman
Miralbell, Raymond
author_facet Peguret, Nicolas
Vock, Jacqueline
Vinh-Hung, Vincent
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Azria, David
Zaidi, Habib
Wissmeyer, Michael
Ratib, Osman
Miralbell, Raymond
author_sort Peguret, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Physiological respiratory motion of tumors growing in the lung can be corrected with respiratory gating when treated with radiotherapy (RT). The optimal respiratory phase for beam-on may be assessed with a respiratory phase optimizer (RPO), a 4D image processing software developed with this purpose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen patients with lung cancer were included in the study. Every patient underwent a 4D-CT providing ten datasets of ten phases of the respiratory cycle (0-100% of the cycle). We defined two morphological parameters for comparison of 4D-CT images in different respiratory phases: tumor-volume to lung-volume ratio and tumor-to-spinal cord distance. The RPO automatized the calculations (200 per patient) of these parameters for each phase of the respiratory cycle allowing to determine the optimal interval for RT. RESULTS: Lower lobe lung tumors not attached to the diaphragm presented with the largest motion with breathing. Maximum inspiration was considered the optimal phase for treatment in 4 patients (28.6%). In 7 patients (50%), however, the RPO showed a most favorable volumetric and spatial configuration in phases other than maximum inspiration. In 2 cases (14.4%) the RPO showed no benefit from gating. This tool was not conclusive in only one case. CONCLUSIONS: The RPO software presented in this study can help to determine the optimal respiratory phase for gated RT based on a few simple morphological parameters. Easy to apply in daily routine, it may be a useful tool for selecting patients who might benefit from breathing adapted RT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3148530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31485302011-08-03 Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer Peguret, Nicolas Vock, Jacqueline Vinh-Hung, Vincent Fenoglietto, Pascal Azria, David Zaidi, Habib Wissmeyer, Michael Ratib, Osman Miralbell, Raymond Radiat Oncol Methodology PURPOSE: Physiological respiratory motion of tumors growing in the lung can be corrected with respiratory gating when treated with radiotherapy (RT). The optimal respiratory phase for beam-on may be assessed with a respiratory phase optimizer (RPO), a 4D image processing software developed with this purpose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fourteen patients with lung cancer were included in the study. Every patient underwent a 4D-CT providing ten datasets of ten phases of the respiratory cycle (0-100% of the cycle). We defined two morphological parameters for comparison of 4D-CT images in different respiratory phases: tumor-volume to lung-volume ratio and tumor-to-spinal cord distance. The RPO automatized the calculations (200 per patient) of these parameters for each phase of the respiratory cycle allowing to determine the optimal interval for RT. RESULTS: Lower lobe lung tumors not attached to the diaphragm presented with the largest motion with breathing. Maximum inspiration was considered the optimal phase for treatment in 4 patients (28.6%). In 7 patients (50%), however, the RPO showed a most favorable volumetric and spatial configuration in phases other than maximum inspiration. In 2 cases (14.4%) the RPO showed no benefit from gating. This tool was not conclusive in only one case. CONCLUSIONS: The RPO software presented in this study can help to determine the optimal respiratory phase for gated RT based on a few simple morphological parameters. Easy to apply in daily routine, it may be a useful tool for selecting patients who might benefit from breathing adapted RT. BioMed Central 2011-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3148530/ /pubmed/21702952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-78 Text en Copyright ©2011 Peguret et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Peguret, Nicolas
Vock, Jacqueline
Vinh-Hung, Vincent
Fenoglietto, Pascal
Azria, David
Zaidi, Habib
Wissmeyer, Michael
Ratib, Osman
Miralbell, Raymond
Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title_full Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title_fullStr Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title_short Breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4D gating software for lung cancer
title_sort breathing adapted radiotherapy: a 4d gating software for lung cancer
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21702952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-78
work_keys_str_mv AT peguretnicolas breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT vockjacqueline breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT vinhhungvincent breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT fenogliettopascal breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT azriadavid breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT zaidihabib breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT wissmeyermichael breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT ratibosman breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer
AT miralbellraymond breathingadaptedradiotherapya4dgatingsoftwareforlungcancer