Cargando…

Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with doxorubicin plus vinorelbine NC. METHODS: Fifty-three patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gwak, Geumhee, Kim, Ji-Young, Park, Keongmee, Shin, Young Joo, Cho, Hyunjin, Park, Sung Jin, Yang, Geun Ho, Bae, Byung Noe, Kim, Ki Whan, Han, Sehwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.2.129
_version_ 1782209357638795264
author Gwak, Geumhee
Kim, Ji-Young
Park, Keongmee
Shin, Young Joo
Cho, Hyunjin
Park, Sung Jin
Yang, Geun Ho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
author_facet Gwak, Geumhee
Kim, Ji-Young
Park, Keongmee
Shin, Young Joo
Cho, Hyunjin
Park, Sung Jin
Yang, Geun Ho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
author_sort Gwak, Geumhee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with doxorubicin plus vinorelbine NC. METHODS: Fifty-three patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) administered every 3 weeks (AD), while 49 patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) administered every 3 weeks (AN). Response rate and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed by administered chemotherapeutics. Response to NC was also analyzed according to clinicobiological characteristics of the primary tumors. RESULTS: Clinical response was observed in 66% with AN and 81.6% with AD chemotherapy. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) with AN and in 7 patients (14.3%) with AD after the surgery. Response rate was significantly higher in AD compared with AN (p=0.038), but there was no significant difference between the two group regard to pCR rate. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 35.8% of AN group, whereas 20 patients (40.8%) of AD group underwent BCS. The patients with HER2-amplified tumor showed significantly increased response to both types of NC. Pathologic complete response was confirmed in 9 (39.1%) out of 23 HER2-amplified tumors, whereas only 4 (5.1%) of 79 HER2-nonamplified tumors showed pathologic complete response. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 22.6% of total 212 cycles in AN and 38.8% of total 196 cycles in AD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 39.6% in AN and 43.9% in AD. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 26.4% with AN and in 40.8% with AD. CONCLUSION: There was no significant increase of pCR by AD compared with AN. Long-term follow-up results of our study indicate that clinical outcome after NC was significantly associated with initial response to NC regardless of therapeutic regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3148544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31485442011-08-16 Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer Gwak, Geumhee Kim, Ji-Young Park, Keongmee Shin, Young Joo Cho, Hyunjin Park, Sung Jin Yang, Geun Ho Bae, Byung Noe Kim, Ki Whan Han, Sehwan J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) with doxorubicin plus vinorelbine NC. METHODS: Fifty-three patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) administered every 3 weeks (AD), while 49 patients underwent 4 cycles of NC consisted of intravenous injection of doxorubicin (50 mg/m(2)) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) administered every 3 weeks (AN). Response rate and treatment-related toxicities were analyzed by administered chemotherapeutics. Response to NC was also analyzed according to clinicobiological characteristics of the primary tumors. RESULTS: Clinical response was observed in 66% with AN and 81.6% with AD chemotherapy. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was confirmed in 6 patients (11.3%) with AN and in 7 patients (14.3%) with AD after the surgery. Response rate was significantly higher in AD compared with AN (p=0.038), but there was no significant difference between the two group regard to pCR rate. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 35.8% of AN group, whereas 20 patients (40.8%) of AD group underwent BCS. The patients with HER2-amplified tumor showed significantly increased response to both types of NC. Pathologic complete response was confirmed in 9 (39.1%) out of 23 HER2-amplified tumors, whereas only 4 (5.1%) of 79 HER2-nonamplified tumors showed pathologic complete response. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 22.6% of total 212 cycles in AN and 38.8% of total 196 cycles in AD. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 39.6% in AN and 43.9% in AD. Grade 3 mucositis was observed in 26.4% with AN and in 40.8% with AD. CONCLUSION: There was no significant increase of pCR by AD compared with AN. Long-term follow-up results of our study indicate that clinical outcome after NC was significantly associated with initial response to NC regardless of therapeutic regimens. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2011-06 2011-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3148544/ /pubmed/21847408 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.2.129 Text en © 2011 Korean Breast Cancer Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gwak, Geumhee
Kim, Ji-Young
Park, Keongmee
Shin, Young Joo
Cho, Hyunjin
Park, Sung Jin
Yang, Geun Ho
Bae, Byung Noe
Kim, Ki Whan
Han, Sehwan
Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title_full Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title_short Comparison of Doxorubicin Plus Docetaxel Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Doxorubicin Plus Vinorelbine in Primary Breast Cancer
title_sort comparison of doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus vinorelbine in primary breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21847408
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2011.14.2.129
work_keys_str_mv AT gwakgeumhee comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT kimjiyoung comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT parkkeongmee comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT shinyoungjoo comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT chohyunjin comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT parksungjin comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT yanggeunho comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT baebyungnoe comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT kimkiwhan comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer
AT hansehwan comparisonofdoxorubicinplusdocetaxelneoadjuvantchemotherapywithdoxorubicinplusvinorelbineinprimarybreastcancer