Cargando…
A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia
Introduction. We sought to compare the performance of endovascular cooling to conventional surface cooling after cardiac arrest. Methods. Patients in coma following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were cooled with an endovascular cooling catheter or with ice bags and cold-water-circulating cooling bla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822470 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/690506 |
_version_ | 1782209369696370688 |
---|---|
author | Finley Caulfield, Anna Rachabattula, Shylaja Eyngorn, Irina Hamilton, Scott A. Kalimuthu, Rajalakshmi Hsia, Amie W. Lansberg, Maarten G. Venkatasubramanian, Chitra Baumann, J. J. Buckwalter, Marion S. Kumar, Monisha A. Castle, James S. Wijman, Christine A. C. |
author_facet | Finley Caulfield, Anna Rachabattula, Shylaja Eyngorn, Irina Hamilton, Scott A. Kalimuthu, Rajalakshmi Hsia, Amie W. Lansberg, Maarten G. Venkatasubramanian, Chitra Baumann, J. J. Buckwalter, Marion S. Kumar, Monisha A. Castle, James S. Wijman, Christine A. C. |
author_sort | Finley Caulfield, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction. We sought to compare the performance of endovascular cooling to conventional surface cooling after cardiac arrest. Methods. Patients in coma following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were cooled with an endovascular cooling catheter or with ice bags and cold-water-circulating cooling blankets to a target temperature of 32.0–34.0°C for 24 hours. Performance of cooling techniques was compared by (1) number of hourly recordings in target temperature range, (2) time elapsed from the written order to initiate cooling and target temperature, and (3) adverse events during the first week. Results. Median time in target temperature range was 19 hours (interquartile range (IQR), 16–20) in the endovascular group versus. 10 hours (IQR, 7–15) in the surface group (P = .001). Median time to target temperature was 4 (IQR, 2.8–6.2) and 4.5 (IQR, 3–6.5) hours, respectively (P = .67). Adverse events were similar. Conclusion. Endovascular cooling maintains target temperatures better than conventional surface cooling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3148603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31486032011-08-05 A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia Finley Caulfield, Anna Rachabattula, Shylaja Eyngorn, Irina Hamilton, Scott A. Kalimuthu, Rajalakshmi Hsia, Amie W. Lansberg, Maarten G. Venkatasubramanian, Chitra Baumann, J. J. Buckwalter, Marion S. Kumar, Monisha A. Castle, James S. Wijman, Christine A. C. Stroke Res Treat Research Article Introduction. We sought to compare the performance of endovascular cooling to conventional surface cooling after cardiac arrest. Methods. Patients in coma following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were cooled with an endovascular cooling catheter or with ice bags and cold-water-circulating cooling blankets to a target temperature of 32.0–34.0°C for 24 hours. Performance of cooling techniques was compared by (1) number of hourly recordings in target temperature range, (2) time elapsed from the written order to initiate cooling and target temperature, and (3) adverse events during the first week. Results. Median time in target temperature range was 19 hours (interquartile range (IQR), 16–20) in the endovascular group versus. 10 hours (IQR, 7–15) in the surface group (P = .001). Median time to target temperature was 4 (IQR, 2.8–6.2) and 4.5 (IQR, 3–6.5) hours, respectively (P = .67). Adverse events were similar. Conclusion. Endovascular cooling maintains target temperatures better than conventional surface cooling. SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research 2011-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3148603/ /pubmed/21822470 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/690506 Text en Copyright © 2011 Anna Finley Caulfield et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Finley Caulfield, Anna Rachabattula, Shylaja Eyngorn, Irina Hamilton, Scott A. Kalimuthu, Rajalakshmi Hsia, Amie W. Lansberg, Maarten G. Venkatasubramanian, Chitra Baumann, J. J. Buckwalter, Marion S. Kumar, Monisha A. Castle, James S. Wijman, Christine A. C. A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title | A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title_full | A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title_short | A Comparison of Cooling Techniques to Treat Cardiac Arrest Patients with Hypothermia |
title_sort | comparison of cooling techniques to treat cardiac arrest patients with hypothermia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3148603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822470 http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/690506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT finleycaulfieldanna acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT rachabattulashylaja acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT eyngornirina acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT hamiltonscotta acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT kalimuthurajalakshmi acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT hsiaamiew acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT lansbergmaarteng acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT venkatasubramanianchitra acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT baumannjj acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT buckwaltermarions acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT kumarmonishaa acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT castlejamess acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT wijmanchristineac acomparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT finleycaulfieldanna comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT rachabattulashylaja comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT eyngornirina comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT hamiltonscotta comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT kalimuthurajalakshmi comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT hsiaamiew comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT lansbergmaarteng comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT venkatasubramanianchitra comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT baumannjj comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT buckwaltermarions comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT kumarmonishaa comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT castlejamess comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia AT wijmanchristineac comparisonofcoolingtechniquestotreatcardiacarrestpatientswithhypothermia |